Following Phase 2 of the upgrade of the ESRF in which the storage ring was replaced by a new low-emittance ring along with many other facility upgrades, the status of ID22, the high-resolution powder-diffraction beamline, is described. The beamline has an in-vacuum undulator as source providing X-rays in the range 6–75 keV. ID22's principle characteristics include very high angular resolution as a result of the highly collimated and monochromatic beam, coupled with a 13-channel Si 111 multi-analyser stage between the sample and a Dectris Eiger2 X 2M-W CdTe pixel detector. The detector's axial resolution allows recorded 2θ values to be automatically corrected for the effects of axial divergence, resulting in narrower and more-symmetric peaks compared with the previous fixed-axial-slit arrangement. The axial acceptance can also be increased with increasing diffraction angle, thus simultaneously improving the statistical quality of high-angle data. A complementary Perkin Elmer XRD1611 medical-imaging detector is available for faster, lower-resolution data, often used at photon energies of 60–70 keV for pair-distribution function analysis, although this is also possible in high-resolution mode by scanning up to 120° 2θ at 35 keV. There are various sample environments, allowing sample temperatures from 4 K to 1600°C, a capillary cell for non-corrosive gas atmospheres in the range 0–100 bar, and a sample-changing robot that can accommodate 75 capillary samples compatible with the temperature range 80 K to 950°C.
Ni-rich layered oxides LiNi1-x-yMnxCoyO2 (NMC811, x = 0.1 and y = 0.1) are considered promising cathode materials in lithium-ion batteries (LiBs) due to their high energy density. However, those suffer a severe capacity loss upon cycling at high delithiated states. The loss of performance over time can be retarded by Zr doping. Herein, a small amount of Zr is added to NMC811 material via two alternative pathways: during the formation of the transition metal (TM) hydroxide precursor at the co-precipitation step (0.1%-Zr-cp) and during the lithiation at the solid-state synthesis step (0.1%-Zr-ss). In this work, the crystallographic Zr uptake in both 0.1%-Zr-ss and 0.1%-Zr-cp is determined and quantified through synchrotron X-ray diffraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. We prove that the inclusion of Zr in the TM site for 0.1%-Zr-cp leads to an improvement of both specific capacity (156 vs 149 mAh/g) and capacity retention (85 vs 82%) upon 100 cycles compared to 0.1%-Zr-ss where the Zr does not diffuse into the active material and forms only an extra phase separated from the NMC811 particles.
An overview of all the studies on high-pressure intrusion—extrusion of LiCl aqueous solutions in hydrophobic pure silica zeolites (zeosils) for absorption and storage of mechanical energy is presented. Operational principles of heterogeneous lyophobic systems and their possible applications in the domains of mechanical energy storage, absorption, and generation are described. The intrusion of LiCl aqueous solutions instead of water allows to considerably increase energetic performance of zeosil-based systems by a strong rise of intrusion pressure. The intrusion pressure increases with the salt concentration and depends considerably on zeosil framework. In the case of channel-type zeosils, it rises with the decrease of pore opening diameter, whereas for cage-type ones, no clear trend is observed. A relative increase of intrusion pressure in comparison with water is particularly strong for the zeosils with narrow pore openings. The use of highly concentrated LiCl aqueous solutions instead of water can lead to a change of system behavior. This effect seems to be related to a lower formation of silanol defects under intrusion of solvated ions and a weaker interaction of the ions with silanol groups of zeosil framework. The influence of zeosil nanostructure on LiCl aqueous solutions intrusion–extrusion is also discussed.
Total scattering data of nanocrystalline gahnite (ZnAl 2 O 4 , 2–3 nm) have been collected with three of the most commonly used instruments: (i) ID31 high-resolution diffractometer at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) ( Qmax = 22 Å −1 ); (ii) ID11 high-energy beamline at the ESRF ( Qmax = 26.6 Å −1 ); and (iii) Empyrean laboratory diffractometer by PANalytical with molybdenum anode X-ray tube ( Qmax = 17.1 Å −1 ). Pair distribution functions (PDFs) for each instrument data-set have been obtained, changing some of the parameters, by PDFgetX3 software, with the aim of testing the software in the treatment of different total scattering data. The material under analysis has been chosen for its nanometric (and possibly disordered) nature, to give rise to a challenge for all the diffractometers involved. None of the latter should have a clear advantage. The PDF and F ( Q ) functions have been visually compared, and then the three PDF sets have been used for refinements by means of PDFgui suite. All the refinements have been made exactly in the same way for the sake of a fair comparison. Small differences could be observed in the experimental PDFs and the derived results, but none of them seemed to be significant.