Rubén Comino Garayoa

Dr. Rubén Comino Garayoa

Complutense University of Madrid
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 May 2021 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rubén Comino GarayoaRubén Comino Garayoa
Rubén Comino Garayoa
JPJesus Pelaez
Jesus Pelaez
CTCelia Tobar
Celia Tobar
VAVerónica Rodríguez Alonso
Verónica Rodríguez Alonso
Maria J SuarezMaria J Suarez
Maria J Suarez
This systematic review aims to evaluate the different pretreatments of the zirconia surface and resin cement in order to determine a valid operative protocol for adhesive cementation. Methodologies conducted for this study followed the Prisma (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. An electronic search was performed in four databases. The established focus question was: “What type of surface conditioning method is the one that obtains the best adhesion values to zirconia over time by applying a resin cement?” Forty-five relevant papers were found to qualify for final inclusion. In total, 260 different surface pretreatment methods, mainly combinations of air-abrasion protocols and adhesive promoters, were investigated. Altogether, the use of two artificial aging methods, three types of cement and four testing methods was reported. The results showed that mechanicochemical surface pretreatments offered the best adhesive results. Self-adhesive cement and those containing 10-MDP obtained the best results in adhesion to zirconia. Artificial aging reduced adhesion, so storage in water for 30 days or thermocycling for 5000 cycles is recommended. A standardized adhesive protocol has not been established due to a lack of evidence

18 November 2020 in Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rubén Comino GarayoaRubén Comino Garayoa
Rubén Comino Garayoa
JBJorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann
Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann
JPJesus Pelaez
Jesus Pelaez
CLCarlos López-Suárez
Carlos López-Suárez
JGJosé María Martínez González
José María Martínez González
Maria J SuarezMaria J Suarez
Maria J Suarez
The purpose of this scoping review was to describe the current state of knowledge and understanding of allergies to titanium dental implants. A scoping review was conducted following the Prisma Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. An electronic search was performed in five databases complemented by manual and grey literature searches. Fifty-two relevant papers were included for final review. Titanium particles can be released from the surfaces of dental implants in a process called tribocorrosion, which may contribute to bone loss due to inflammatory reaction. Diverse mechanisms have been described that may trigger allergy to titanium, as well as the clinical signs that manifest as the allergy develops. Allergies to titanium are uncommon but represent a real possibility that should not be overlooked in patients requiring prosthodontic rehabilitation with dental implants. Allergy can trigger a range of symptoms. Patients who have already been diagnosed with allergies to other metals will be more predisposed to suffering an allergy to titanium. Further investigation is needed in order to measure the true scope of these allergies.