Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease, one of the symptoms of which is a gait disorder, which decreases gait speed and cadence. Recently, augmented feedback training has been considered to achieve effective physical rehabilitation. Therefore, we have devised a numerical modeling process and algorithm for gait detection and classification (GDC) that actively utilizes augmented feedback training. The numerical model converted each joint angle into a magnitude of acceleration (MoA) and a Z-axis angular velocity (ZAV) parameter. Subsequently, we confirmed the validity of both the GDC numerical modeling and algorithm. As a result, a higher gait detection and classification rate (GDCR) could be observed at a higher gait speed and lower acceleration threshold (AT) and gyroscopic threshold (GT). However, the pattern of the GDCR was ambiguous if the patient was affected by a gait disorder compared to a normal user. To utilize the relationships between the GDCR, AT, GT, and gait speed, we controlled the GDCR by using AT and GT as inputs, which we found to be a reasonable methodology. Moreover, the GDC algorithm could distinguish between normal people and people who suffered from gait disorders. Consequently, the GDC method could be used for rehabilitation and gait evaluation.

Cueing and feedback training can be effective in maintaining or improving gait in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. We previously designed a rehabilitation assist device that can detect and classify a user’s gait at only the swing phase of the gait cycle, for the ease of data processing. In this study, we analyzed the impact of various factors in a gait detection algorithm on the gait detection and classification rate (GDCR). We collected acceleration and angular velocity data from 25 participants (1 male and 24 females with an average age of 62 ± 6 years) using our device and analyzed the data using statistical methods. Based on these results, we developed an adaptive GDCR control algorithm using several equations and functions. We tested the algorithm under various virtual exercise scenarios using two control methods, based on acceleration and angular velocity, and found that the acceleration threshold was more effective in controlling the GDCR (average Spearman correlation −0.9996, p < 0.001) than the gyroscopic threshold. Our adaptive control algorithm was more effective in maintaining the target GDCR than the other algorithms (p < 0.001) with an average error of 0.10, while other tested methods showed average errors of 0.16 and 0.28. This algorithm has good scalability and can be adapted for future gait detection and classification applications.