Konrad Klinghammer

Dr. Konrad Klinghammer

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 November 2014 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKonrad Klinghammer
Konrad Klinghammer
JRJan‐Dirk Raguse
Jan‐Dirk Raguse
TPThomas Plath
Thomas Plath
AAAndreas E. Albers
Andreas E. Albers
KJKorinna Joehrens
Korinna Joehrens
IFIduna Fichtner
Iduna Fichtner
Patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) models have shown to reflect original patient tumors better than any other preclinical model. We embarked in a study establishing a large panel of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas PDX for biomarker analysis and evaluation of established and novel compounds. Out of 115 transplanted specimens 52 models were established of which 29 were characterized for response to docetaxel, cetuximab, methotrexate, carboplatin, 5‐fluorouracil and everolimus. Further, tumors were subjected to sequencing analysis and gene expression profiling of selected mTOR pathway members. Most frequent response was observed for docetaxel and cetuximab. Responses to carboplatin, 5‐fluorouracil and methotrexate were moderate. Everolimus revealed activity in the majority of PDX. Mutational profiling and gene expression analysis did not reveal a predictive biomarker for everolimus even though by trend RPS6KB1 mRNA expression was associated with response. In conclusion we demonstrate a comprehensively characterized panel of head and neck cancer PDX models, which represent a valuable and renewable tissue resource for evaluation of novel compounds and associated biomarkers.

1 April 2017 in Cancer Treatment Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKonrad Klinghammer
Konrad Klinghammer
WWWolfgang Walther
Wolfgang Walther
JHJens Hoffmann
Jens Hoffmann

29 April 2025 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JFJérôme Fayette
Jérôme Fayette
LLLisa Licitra
Lisa Licitra
KHKevin Harrington
Kevin Harrington
RHRobert Haddad
Robert Haddad
LSLillian L. Siu
Lillian L. Siu
DADouglas R. Adkins
Douglas R. Adkins
Purpose: Treatment options for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after failure of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment and platinum-based chemotherapy are limited. Preliminary data suggested that monalizumab plus cetuximab had clinical activity in R/M HNSCC. Patients and Methods: INTERLINK-1 (NCT04590963) was a double-blind, phase III study. Participants with R/M HNSCC who had received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and progressed despite platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to monalizumab (750 mg, every 2 weeks) or placebo, plus cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading dose, then 250 mg/m2, weekly). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in participants with non-oropharyngeal cancer or human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-unrelated analysis set). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and objective response rate. Results: At data cutoff, 216 participants were randomized in the HPV-unrelated analysis set: 145 to monalizumab plus cetuximab and 71 to placebo plus cetuximab. Median OS was 8.8 months for monalizumab plus cetuximab versus 8.6 months for placebo plus cetuximab (HR, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.66–1.54); median progression-free survival was 3.6 versus 3.8 months, respectively (HR, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.79–1.57); and the objective response rate was 15.2% versus 23.9%, respectively. INTERLINK-1 was terminated after a preplanned interim analysis showed that futility criteria were met (predetermined futility HR >0.874). Grade 3/4 treatment–related adverse events were reported in 18.3% and 17.2% of participants treated in the monalizumab and placebo arms, respectively. Conclusions: Monalizumab plus cetuximab did not improve OS compared with placebo plus cetuximab. The safety profile of the combination was consistent with safety observations for cetuximab monotherapy.

21 June 2017 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KKKonrad Klinghammer
Konrad Klinghammer
RORaik Otto
Raik Otto
JRJan-Dirk Raguse
Jan-Dirk Raguse
AAAndreas E. Albers
Andreas E. Albers
ITIngeborg Tinhofer
Ingeborg Tinhofer
JHJens Hoffmann
Jens Hoffmann

28 February 2021 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WYWenhao Yao
Wenhao Yao
XQXu Qian
Xu Qian
SOSebastian Ochsenreither
Sebastian Ochsenreither
Soldano FerroneSoldano Ferrone
Soldano Ferrone
ADAlbert B. DeLeo
Albert B. DeLeo
AAAndreas E. Albers
Andreas E. Albers
The poor prognosis of locally advanced and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is primarily mediated by the functional properties of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and resistance to chemoradiotherapy. We investigated whether the aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) inhibitor disulfiram (DSF) can enhance the sensitivity of therapy. Cell viability was assessed by the 1-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-3,5-diphenylformazan (MTT) and apoptosis assays, and the cell cycle and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels were evaluated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). The radio-sensitizing effect was measured by a colony formation assay. The synergistic effects were calculated by combination index (CI) analyses. The DSF and DSF/Cu2+ inhibited the cell proliferation (inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50) of DSF and DSF/Cu2+ were 13.96 μM and 0.24 μM). DSF and cisplatin displayed a synergistic effect (CI values were <1). DSF or DSF/Cu2+ abolished the cisplatin-induced G2/M arrest (from 52.9% to 40.7% and 41.1%), and combining irradiation (IR) with DSF or DSF/Cu2+ reduced the colony formation and attenuated the G2/M arrest (from 53.6% to 40.2% and 41.9%). The combination of cisplatin, DSF or DSF/Cu2+, and IR enhanced the radio-chemo sensitivity by inducing apoptosis (42.04% and 32.21%) and ROS activity (46.3% and 37.4%). DSF and DSF/Cu2+ enhanced the sensitivity of HNSCC to cisplatin and IR. Confirming the initial data from patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) supported a strong rationale to repurpose DSF as a radio-chemosensitizer and to assess its therapeutic potential in a clinical setting.

1 November 2019 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKonrad Klinghammer
Konrad Klinghammer
TGT. Gauler
T. Gauler
ADA. Dietz
A. Dietz
VGV. Grünwald
V. Grünwald
JSJ. Stöhlmacher
J. Stöhlmacher
UKU. Keilholz
U. Keilholz