Yihui Liu

Dr. Yihui Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2020 in Journal of Infection and Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DWDongyuan Wang
Dongyuan Wang
Zigang LiZigang Li
Zigang Li
YLYihui Liu
Yihui Liu
Since a novel coronavirus pneumonia outbreak in late December 2019, coronavirus disease -19 (COVID-19) epidemic has gradually spread worldwide, becoming a major public health event. No specific antivirals are currently available for COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The treatments for COVID-19 are mainly based on the experiences of similar virus such SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, HIV and influenza viruses. Scientists have taken great efforts to investigate the effective methods for the treatment of COVID-19. Up to now, there are over 1000 clinical studies for COVID-19 all over the world. In this article, we reviewed the current options for COVID-19 therapy including small molecules such as Remdesivir, Favipiravir, Lopinavir/Ritonavir etc, peptide inhibitors of ACE2, Traditional Chinese Medicines and Biologics such as SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibodies, mesenchymal stem cells and vaccines etc. Meanwhile, we systematically reviewed their clinical safety, clinical applications and progress of antiviral researches. The therapeutic effect of these antiviral drugs is summarized and compared, hoping to provide some ideas for clinical options of COVID-19 treatment and also provide experiences for the life-threatening virus diseases in the future.

1 April 2020 in Pathology - Research and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCChen Chen
Chen Chen
YLYihui Liu
Yihui Liu
SCShu-Biao Cheng
Shu-Biao Cheng
SWSan-Lan Wu
San-Lan Wu
XZXue-Jia Zhai
Xue-Jia Zhai

1 January 2020 in Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYihui Liu
Yihui Liu
ZXZhi-Nan Xiang
Zhi-Nan Xiang
CCChen Chen
Chen Chen
LWLuo-Sheng Wan
Luo-Sheng Wan
JCJia-Chun Chen
Jia-Chun Chen
In this study, C57BL/6J mice with high‐fat diet‐ (HFD‐) induced hyperlipidemia were treated with total Liriope spicata var. prolifera polysaccharides (TLSP: 200, 400, and 800 mg/kg body weight), simvastatin (3 mg/kg body weight), or saline for 8 weeks, respectively. The results showed that TLSP had strong lipid‐lowering and hepatoprotective effects on C57BL/6J mice with HFD‐induced hyperlipidemia. TLSP administration significantly reduced serum total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) levels and downregulated the expressions of peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor (PPAR)γ and fatty acid synthase (FAS) in the adipose and liver tissues of the mice. TLSP exerted hypolipidemic and hepatoprotective effects by activating lipid/bile acid metabolism via the FXH‐SHP/CYP7A1 and SEBP‐1c/FAC/ACC signaling pathways. Thus, TLPS is a promising natural polymer with hepatoprotective and hypolipidemic properties.

1 January 2013 in Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYihui Liu
Yihui Liu
LWLuosheng Wan
Luosheng Wan
ZXZuoqi Xiao
Zuoqi Xiao
JWJingjing Wang
Jingjing Wang
YWYonglong Wang
Yonglong Wang
JCJiachun Chen
Jiachun Chen
Tuberous root ofLiriope spicatavar.proliferahas been widely used as a traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of diabetes. The present study investigated the antidiabetic effect and the potential mechanisms of two new polysaccharides (LSP1, LSP2) and the total polysaccharides (TLSP), isolated from the tuberous roots. Upon the intragastric administration in obese insulin-resistant diabetic KKAy mice for 28 days, TLSP, LSP1, and LSP2 all caused a remarkable decrease of fasting blood glucose and significant improvement of insulin resistance and serum lipid metabolism in diabetic mice. In addition, liver histological analysis showed that TLSP, LSP1, and LSP2 significantly ameliorated the hepatocyte hypertrophy and decreased the lipid accumulation in the mice liver. Further experiments suggested that TLSP, LSP1, and LSP2 effectively inhibited hepatic gluconeogenesis and increased hepatic glycolysis and hepatic glycogen content. Furthermore, the mechanistic analysis showed the increased expression of insulin-receptorαsubunit, insulin-receptor substrate-1, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and peroxisome proliferators-activated receptorsγ. These results suggested that TLSP, LSP1, and LSP2 manifest strong antidiabetic activity, therefore hold a great promise for therapeutic application in diabetic therapy and other related metabolic disorders.

11 November 2025 in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLi Sen
Li Sen
XKXiong Kangpin
Xiong Kangpin
YLYihui Liu
Yihui Liu
Balancing thromboembolic prevention against bleeding complications remains a critical challenge in anticoagulant therapy. While established bleeding risk assessment models (RAMs) such as HAS-BLED and HEMORR 2 HAGES were initially developed for warfarin-treated patients, their applicability to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) users and venous thromboembolism (VTE) populations remained uncertain. This review synthesized recent advancements in bleeding risk stratification for atrial fibrillation (AF) and VTE patients, focusing on model performance, drug-specific adaptations, and emerging biomarker-driven approaches. For AF patients, traditional RAMs (HAS-BLED, HEMORR 2 HAGES, ATRIA) demonstrated moderate predictive accuracy (AUC: 0.55–0.74) in NOAC cohorts, with HEMORR 2 HAGES showing superior discrimination in certain studies. The biomarker-integrated ABC (incorporating GDF-15, troponin, hemoglobin) and the NOAC-specific DOAC score, have shown improved risk stratification, with the latter demonstrating a higher C-statistic than HAS-BLED. In VTE populations, the IMPROVE (AUC: 0.62–0.73) effectively identified high-risk medical inpatients, while the RIETE (major bleeding incidence: 0.1%–6.2%) and EINSTEIN (C-statistic: 0.68–0.74) addressed dynamic risks during anticoagulation. However, heterogeneity in validation cohorts, endpoint definitions (e.g., ISTH vs. TIMI criteria), and static risk factor selections limited cross-model generalizability. Current RAMs exhibited variable performance across anticoagulant regimens and clinical contexts highlighting the need for next-generation models that integrate dynamic risk modifiers (e.g., transient anemia, antiplatelet use) and biomarker-based approaches. While NOAC-specific tools such as the DOAC may be more appropriate for AF patients, context-adapted models like IMPROVE and RIETE are better suited for VTE populations. Future research should prioritize real-world validation, machine learning integration, and the standardization of bleeding definitions to advance precision anticoagulation strategies.