Periasamy Selvaraj

Dr. Periasamy Selvaraj

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 September 2013 in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSanjay Srivatsan
Sanjay Srivatsan
JPJaina M Patel
Jaina M Patel
EBErica N Bozeman
Erica N Bozeman
IIImade E Imasuen
Imade E Imasuen
SHSara He
Sara He
PSPeriasamy Selvaraj
Periasamy Selvaraj
The high mortality rate associated with cancer and its resistance to conventional treatments such as radiation and chemotherapy has led to the investigation of a variety of anti-cancer immunotherapies. The development of novel immunotherapies has been bolstered by the discovery of tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), through gene sequencing and proteomics. One such immunotherapy employs established allogeneic human cancer cell lines to induce antitumor immunity in patients through TAA presentation. Allogeneic cancer immunotherapies are desirable in a clinical setting due to their ease of production and availability. This review aims to summarize clinical trials of allogeneic tumor immunotherapies in various cancer types. To date, clinical trials have shown limited success due potentially to extensive degrees of inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity found among cancer patients. However, these clinical results provide guidance for the rational design and creation of more effective allogeneic tumor immunotherapies for use as monotherapies or in combination with other therapies.

1 October 1995 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNShanmugam Nagarajan
Shanmugam Nagarajan
SCScott Chesla
Scott Chesla
LCLisa Cobern
Lisa Cobern
PAPaul Anderson
Paul Anderson
CZCheng Zhu
Cheng Zhu
PSPeriasamy Selvaraj
Periasamy Selvaraj
CD16, the low affinity Fc γ receptor III for IgG (FcγRIII), exists as a polypeptide-anchored form (FcγRIIIA or CD16A) in human natural killer cells and macrophages and as a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored form (FcγRIIIB or CD16B) in neutrophils. CD16A requires association of the γ subunit of FcϵRI or the ζ subunit of the TCR-CD3 complex for cell surface expression. The CD16B is polymorphic and the two alleles are termed NA1 and NA2. In this study, CD16A and the two alleles of CD16B have been expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and their ligand binding and phagocytic properties analyzed. The two allelic forms of CD16B showed a similar affinity toward human IgG1. However, the NA1 allele showed approximately 2-fold higher affinity for the IgG3 than the NA2 allele. Although all three forms of CD16 efficiently bound rabbit IgG-coated erythrocytes (EA), only CD16A coexpressed with the γ subunit phagocytosed EA. The phagocytosis mediated by CD16A expressed on CHO cells was independent of divalent cations but dependent on intact microfilaments. CHO cells expressing CD16A-γ and CD16A-ζ chimeras also phagocytosed EA. The phagocytosis was specifically inhibited by tyrphostin-23, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In summary, our results demonstrate that glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored CD16B alleles differ from CD16A in their ability to mediate phagocytosis. Furthermore, since studies with other FcγRs have shown that CHO cells lack the phagocytic pathway mediated by the cytoplasmic domain of FcγRs, the phagocytosis of EA by CHO cells stably transfected with CD16A and CD16A-subunit chimera provides an ideal system to dissect the phagocytic signaling pathways mediated by these FcγR-associated subunits.

23 November 2021 in Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLuis Enrique Munoz
Luis Enrique Munoz
LHLei Huang
Lei Huang
RBRamireddy Bommireddy
Ramireddy Bommireddy
RSRicha Sharma
Richa Sharma
LMLenore Monterroza
Lenore Monterroza
PSPeriasamy Selvaraj
Periasamy Selvaraj
Background PD-L1 is one of the major immune checkpoints which limits the effectiveness of antitumor immunity. Blockade of PD-L1/PD-1 has been a major improvement in the treatment of certain cancers, however, the response rate to checkpoint blockade remains low suggesting a need for new therapies. Metformin has emerged as a potential new drug for the treatment of cancer due to its effects on PD-L1 expression, T cell responses, and the immunosuppressive environment within tumors. While the benefits of metformin in combination with checkpoint blockade have been reported in animal models, little remains known about its effect on other types of immunotherapy. Methods Vaccine immunotherapy and metformin were administered to mice inoculated with tumors to investigate the effect of metformin and TMV vaccine on tumor growth, metastasis, PD-L1 expression, immune cell infiltration, and CD8 T cell phenotype. The effect of metformin on IFN-γ induced PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was assessed by flow cytometry, western blot, and RT-qPCR. Results We observed that tumors that respond to metformin and vaccine immunotherapy combination show a reduction in surface PD-L1 expression compared with tumor models that do not respond to metformin. In vitro assays showed that the effect of metformin on tumor cell PD-L1 expression was mediated in part by AMP-activated protein kinase signaling. Vaccination results in increased T cell infiltration in all tumor models, and this was not further enhanced by metformin. However, we observed an increased number of CD8 T cells expressing PD-1, Ki-67, Tim-3, and CD62L as well as increased effector cytokine production after treatment with metformin and tumor membrane vesicle vaccine. Conclusions Our data suggest that metformin can synergize with vaccine immunotherapy to augment the antitumor response through tumor-intrinsic mechanisms and also alter the phenotype and function of CD8 T cells within the tumor, which could provide insights for its use in the clinic.

1 January 2004 in Immunologic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PSPeriasamy Selvaraj
Periasamy Selvaraj
NFNimita Fifadara
Nimita Fifadara
SNShanmugam Nagarajan
Shanmugam Nagarajan
ACAshley Cimino
Ashley Cimino
GWGuixian Wang
Guixian Wang

1 February 2000 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SNShanmugam Nagarajan
Shanmugam Nagarajan
KVKala Venkiteswaran
Kala Venkiteswaran
MAMichael Anderson
Michael Anderson
USUmar Sayed
Umar Sayed
CZCheng Zhu
Cheng Zhu
PSPeriasamy Selvaraj
Periasamy Selvaraj
Neutrophils express 2 low-affinity FcγR, FcγRIIIB (CD16B), and FcγRIIA (CD32A). CD16B is a glycosyl-phosphatidyl inositol-anchored molecule, whereas CD32A is a polypeptide-anchored molecule. These 2 receptors also differ in their signaling. The biological significance of coexpression of 2 FcγRs with distinct membrane anchors and signaling capacities is not clearly understood. Using neutrophils from a CD16B-deficient donor and normal neutrophils treated with anti-CD16 monoclonal antibodies, the authors demonstrated that affinity modulation of CD32A is one of the mechanisms by which neutrophils regulate their FcγR-dependent functions. Neutrophils isolated from a CD16B− donor rosetted poorly with sheep erythrocytes opsonized with rabbit IgG (EA) (12% ± 2% versus 80% ± 6% for control) and were unable to mediate immunophagocytosis. However, activation of CD16B−neutrophils with fMLP, a bacterial chemotactic peptide, increased the CD32A-dependent EA rosetting to 58%. The CD32A-dependent rosetting of fMLP-activated normal neutrophils also increased nearly 5-fold, but there was no increase in CD32A expression. The CD32A-dependent immune complex (IC) binding was also increased in activated neutrophils. This affinity regulation was not observed with CD32A expressed on Chinese hamster ovary cells. These results suggest that in resting neutrophils CD32A is in a low-affinity state and that these cells primarily engage CD16B for IC binding. However, once the neutrophils are activated, the CD32A is converted to a high-affinity state that leads to CD32A-dependent ligand binding and signaling. These results suggest that neutrophils adopt a novel strategy to engage the 2 different FcγR selectively during physiologic and pathologic conditions to carry out their functions efficiently.

9 October 2024 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Hussein SabitHussein Sabit
Hussein Sabit
Borros Michael ArnethBorros Michael Arneth
Borros Michael Arneth
SIShaimaa Eid Ibraheem
Shaimaa Eid Ibraheem
EMEngy Fayez Madyan
Engy Fayez Madyan
AGAshraf H. Ghaleb
Ashraf H. Ghaleb
AEAhmed Elhashash
Ahmed Elhashash
Liver cancer represents a substantial global health challenge, contributing significantly to worldwide morbidity and mortality. It has long been understood that tumors are not composed solely of cancerous cells, but also include a variety of normal cells within their structure. These tumor-associated normal cells encompass vascular endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and various inflammatory cells, including neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, mast cells, eosinophils, and lymphocytes. Additionally, tumor cells engage in complex interactions with stromal cells and elements of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Initially, the components of what is now known as the tumor microenvironment (TME) were thought to be passive bystanders in the processes of tumor proliferation and local invasion. However, recent research has significantly advanced our understanding of the TME’s active role in tumor growth and metastasis. Tumor progression is now known to be driven by an intricate imbalance of positive and negative regulatory signals, primarily influenced by specific growth factors produced by both inflammatory and neoplastic cells. This review article explores the latest developments and future directions in understanding how the TME modulates liver cancer, with the aim of informing the design of novel therapies that target critical components of the TME.