To improve our knowledge regarding plant responses to herbivory we subjected juvenile birches (Betula pubescens) to different types of simulated herbivory, i.e., removal of the top (1 cm) of the main stem or defoliaiton (including removal of main stem top), and to different levels of intraspecific competition (i.e., three stand densities). Treatments were also repeated during the following year. Birch responses to these treatments were measured as changes in plant height and dry mass. Defoliated plants showed reduced growth irrespective of the level of intraspecific competition. Topped plants in the low—density plots showed enhanced growth, i.e., over—compensation, whereas topped plants growth in the high— and medium—density plots were unaffected by the treatments. Our results indicate that we should expect a continuum of plant responses to herbivory. Thus, there is little value in asking whether herbivory has a positive or negative effect on plant growth. Instead, emphasis should be placed on identifying conditions under which we would expect different responses. Further, we suggest that overcompensation should not generally be considered as an adaptive response that has evolved as a consequence of natural selection due to herbivory, but rather as an indirect consequence of selection for competitive ability. Because apical dominance (assumed to be an adaptation to competition) restricts growth, the growth rate will increase if apical dominance is removed.

The multi-scale approach to conserving forest biodiversity has been used in Sweden since the 1980s, a period defined by increased reserve area and conservation actions within production forests. However, two thousand forest-associated species remain on Sweden’s red-list, and Sweden’s 2020 goals for sustainable forests are not being met. We argue that ongoing changes in the production forest matrix require more consideration, and that multi-scale conservation must be adapted to, and integrated with, production forest development. To make this case, we summarize trends in habitat provision by Sweden’s protected and production forests, and the variety of ways silviculture can affect biodiversity. We discuss how different forestry trajectories affect the type and extent of conservation approaches needed to secure biodiversity, and suggest leverage points for aiding the adoption of diversified silviculture. Sweden’s long-term experience with multi-scale conservation and intensive forestry provides insights for other countries trying to conserve species within production landscapes.