Klaus Jaffe

Dr. Klaus Jaffe


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 June 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KJKlaus Jaffe
Klaus Jaffe
MCMario Caicedo
Mario Caicedo
MMMarcos Manzanares
Marcos Manzanares
MGMario Gil
Mario Gil
ARAlfredo Rios
Alfredo Rios
VDVicente Davila
Vicente Davila
Scientific productivity of middle income countries correlates stronger with present and future wealth than indices reflecting its financial, social, economic or technological sophistication. We identify the contribution of the relative productivity of different scientific disciplines in predicting the future economic growth of a nation. Results show that rich and poor countries differ in the relative proportion of their scientific output in the different disciplines: countries with higher relative productivity in basic sciences such as physics and chemistry had the highest economic growth in the following five years compared to countries with a higher relative productivity in applied sciences such as medicine and pharmacy. Results suggest that the economies of middle income countries that focus their academic efforts in selected areas of applied knowledge grow slower than countries which invest in general basic sciences.

7 September 2010 in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KJKlaus Jaffe
Klaus Jaffe

1 January 2004 in Evolutionary Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LALiliana Alvarez
Liliana Alvarez
KJKlaus Jaffe
Klaus Jaffe
Theoretical studies suggest that mating and pair formation is not likely to be random. Computer simulations suggested that sex among genetically complex organisms requires mate choice strategies for its evolutionary maintenance, to reduce excessive genetic variance produced by out-crossing. One strategy achieving this aim efficiently in computer simulations is assortative mating modeled as “self seeking like”. Another one is selection of “good genes”. Assortative mating increases the probability of finding a genetically similar mate, without fomenting inbreeding, achieving assortative mating without hindering the working of other mate selection strategies which aim to maximize the search for “good genes”, optimizing the working of sex in evolutionary terms. Here we present indirect evidence that in a significant proportion of human reproductive couples, the partners show much higher facial resemblances than can be expected by random pair formation, or as the outcome of “matching for attractiveness” or the outcome of competition for the most attractive partner accessible, as had been previously assumed. The data presented is compatible with the hypothesis derived from computer simulations, that human mate selection strategies achieve various aims: “self seeking like” (including matching for attractiveness) and mating with the best available genes.

4 August 2004 in Journal of Ethology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CPChristina Payne
Christina Payne
KJKlaus Jaffe
Klaus Jaffe

20 December 2001 in Journal of Insect Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJ.V. Hernández
J.V. Hernández
HLHender Lopez
Hender Lopez
KJKlaus Jaffe
Klaus Jaffe

16 April 2018 in Journal of Biological Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KJKlaus Jaffe
Klaus Jaffe