Giuseppe Inturri

Prof. Giuseppe Inturri

Department of Electric, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2017 in Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EMEdoardo Marcucci
Edoardo Marcucci
MPMichela Le Pira
Michela Le Pira
VGValerio Gatta
Valerio Gatta
GIGiuseppe Inturri
Giuseppe Inturri
MATTEO IGNACCOLOMATTEO IGNACCOLO
MATTEO IGNACCOLO
APAlessandro Pluchino
Alessandro Pluchino

1 September 2017 in Research in Transportation Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMichela Le Pira
Michela Le Pira
EMEdoardo Marcucci
Edoardo Marcucci
VGValerio Gatta
Valerio Gatta
GIGiuseppe Inturri
Giuseppe Inturri
MATTEO IGNACCOLOMATTEO IGNACCOLO
MATTEO IGNACCOLO
Alessandro PluchinoAlessandro Pluchino
Alessandro Pluchino

9 November 2017 in European Transport Research Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMichela Le Pira
Michela Le Pira
EMEdoardo Marcucci
Edoardo Marcucci
VGValerio Gatta
Valerio Gatta
MATTEO IGNACCOLOMATTEO IGNACCOLO
MATTEO IGNACCOLO
GIGiuseppe Inturri
Giuseppe Inturri
APAlessandro Pluchino
Alessandro Pluchino
This paper addresses the complex problem of multi-stakeholder decisions in urban freight transport policy-making from a public authority perspective, by proposing a procedure based on a modelling approach to support stakeholder involvement in the decision-making process. The paper analyses the existing methods that can be used for participatory decision-support, with the intent of contextualizing and introducing the innovative modelling approach.

1 December 2011 in Cities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PGPaolo La Greca
Paolo La Greca
LUCA BARBAROSSALUCA BARBAROSSA
LUCA BARBAROSSA
MATTEO IGNACCOLOMATTEO IGNACCOLO
MATTEO IGNACCOLO
GIGiuseppe Inturri
Giuseppe Inturri
FMFrancesco Martinico
Francesco Martinico

1 September 2016 in Case Studies on Transport Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMichela Le Pira
Michela Le Pira
MATTEO IGNACCOLOMATTEO IGNACCOLO
MATTEO IGNACCOLO
GIGiuseppe Inturri
Giuseppe Inturri
APAlessandro Pluchino
Alessandro Pluchino
Andrea RapisardaAndrea Rapisarda
Andrea Rapisarda

24 January 2022 in Journal of Advanced Transportation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giovanni CalabròGiovanni Calabrò
Giovanni Calabrò
MPMichela Le Pira
Michela Le Pira
Nadia GiuffridaNadia Giuffrida
Nadia Giuffrida
GIGiuseppe Inturri
Giuseppe Inturri
MATTEO IGNACCOLOMATTEO IGNACCOLO
MATTEO IGNACCOLO
Gonçalo CorreiaGonçalo Correia
Gonçalo Correia
Feeder transport services are fundamental as first and last-mile connectors of mass rapid transit (MRT). They are especially beneficial in low-demand areas where private transport is usually the main transport mode. Besides, the rapid spread of new technologies such as vehicle automation and the shared mobility paradigm gave rise to new mobility-on-demand modes that can dynamically match demand with service supply. In this context, the new generation of real-time demand-responsive transport services can act as on-demand feeders of MRT, but their performance needs to be compared with conventional fixed-route fixed-schedule feeders. This article aims at presenting an agent-based model able to simulate different feeder services and explore the conditions that make a demand-responsive feeder (DRF) service more or less attractive than a fixed-route fixed-schedule feeder (FRF). The parametric simulation environment creates realistic constraints and parameters that are usually not included in analytical models because of high computational complexity. First, we identified the critical demand density representing a switching point between the two services. Once the demand density is fixed, exploratory scenarios are tested by changing the demand spatial distribution and patterns, service area, and service configurations. Main results suggest that the DRF is to be preferred when the demand is spatially concentrated close to the MRT station (e.g., in a TOD-like land-use area) or when station spacing is quite high (e.g., a regional railway service), whereas the FRF performs better when the demand is mainly originated at the MRT station to any other destinations in the service area (e.g., during peak hours). Besides, automated vehicles could play a role in reducing the operator cost if the service is performed with many small vehicles rather than higher-capacity vehicles, even if this would not imply a major benefit gain for the users.