Fumi Mizuhashi

Dr. Fumi Mizuhashi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 April 2017 in Dental Traumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FMFumi Mizuhashi
Fumi Mizuhashi
KKKaoru Koide
Kaoru Koide

26 June 2020 in Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IOIchiro Ogura
Ichiro Ogura
YMYoshiyuki Minami
Yoshiyuki Minami
YSYoshihiro Sugawara
Yoshihiro Sugawara
RMRyo Mizuhashi
Ryo Mizuhashi
FMFumi Mizuhashi
Fumi Mizuhashi
HSHisato Saegusa
Hisato Saegusa

8 December 2011 in Dental Traumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FMFumi Mizuhashi
Fumi Mizuhashi
KKKaoru Koide
Kaoru Koide
MTMutsumi Takahashi
Mutsumi Takahashi
RMRyo Mizuhashi
Ryo Mizuhashi

1 January 2015 in The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FMFumi Mizuhashi
Fumi Mizuhashi
KKKaoru Koide
Kaoru Koide
STShuji Toya
Shuji Toya
MTMutsumi Takahashi
Mutsumi Takahashi
RMRyo Mizuhashi
Ryo Mizuhashi
HSHiromi Shimomura
Hiromi Shimomura

1 July 2014 in Journal of Prosthodontic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMutsumi Takahashi
Mutsumi Takahashi
KKKaoru Koide
Kaoru Koide
FMFumi Mizuhashi
Fumi Mizuhashi
The aim of this study was to determine the optimal heating conditions for sheet forming using a circle tray by comparing the thickness and fit of mouthguards formed under different conditions. Mouthguards were fabricated using ethylene vinyl acetate sheets (4.0mm thick) and a vacuum forming machine. The working model was trimmed to a height of 20mm at the incisor and 15 mm at the first molar. Two forming conditions were compared: square sheets were pinched by the clamping frame attached to the forming machine; and round sheets were pinched at the top and bottom and stabilized by a circle tray. Each condition was defined when the sheet sagged by 10-mm or 15-mm below the level of the clamp. The thickness of the sheet was determined for the incisal and molar portion. Additionally, the difference in fit according to the forming conditions was measured by examining the cross section. Differences in the thickness or the fit due to forming conditions were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests. The thickness after formation was thicker at the 10-mm condition than that of 15-mm, and the fit at the 15-mm condition was better when that of 10-mm with square and round sheets. Within the limitation of this study, it was suggested that when forming a mouthguard using a 4.0-mm EVA sheet and a circle tray on a vacuum forming machine, the sheet should be formed at a sagging distance of 10-mm.

20 February 2017 in Dental Traumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FMFumi Mizuhashi
Fumi Mizuhashi
KKKaoru Koide
Kaoru Koide
RMRyo Mizuhashi
Ryo Mizuhashi