Subhajit Biswas

Dr. Subhajit Biswas

CSIR Indian Institute of Chemical Biology
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 January 2012 in Gut
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DCDaniel Candotti
Daniel Candotti
CLC Kit Lin
C Kit Lin
DBDalila Belkhiri
Dalila Belkhiri
TSTasanee Sakuldamrongpanich
Tasanee Sakuldamrongpanich
Subhajit BiswasSubhajit Biswas
Subhajit Biswas
JAJean-Pierre Allain
Jean-Pierre Allain
Objective: To investigate the molecular basis of occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (OBI) in Asian blood donors. Design: OBI donors from Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand were tested for HBV serological markers, and strains were molecularly characterised. Results: Among 138 confirmed OBI carriers (median age 47 years), HBV genotypes B and C were dominant (60% and 34%, respectively) in agreement with the genotype distribution in chronically infected donors in the region. Viral load ranged between unquantifiable and 3670 IU/ml (median 11 IU/ml). Eleven per cent of OBIs showed an unusual anti-HBs-only serological profile without evidence of past vaccination for most of these individuals. Occult HBV strains showed a higher genetic diversity than strains from matched hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)+ donors, irrespective of genotype. No unique genetic signature or evidence of reduced replication competence was found. Mutations in the vicinity of the pre-S2/S splice donor site were common in OBIB (44%) and OBIC (36%) strains. S regions from four OBI cases were transfected in HuH7 cells. Results showed limited HBsAg secretion and suggested that mutations disrupting the splice donor site structure may affect pre-S2/S mRNA splicing. Conclusions: There is indirect evidence that incomplete immune control is involved in the occurrence of OBI in Asian blood donors infected with genotypes B and C as observed in Europe with genotype A2 but to a lower extent than with genotype D. A post-transcriptional mechanism may play a role in HBsAg expression in some OBIs irrespective of HBV genotype.

1 November 2016 in LWT
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDPalashpriya Das
Palashpriya Das
SKSuman Khowala
Suman Khowala
Subhajit BiswasSubhajit Biswas
Subhajit Biswas

15 July 2013 in Journal of Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Subhajit BiswasSubhajit Biswas
Subhajit Biswas
DCDaniel Candotti
Daniel Candotti
JAJean-Pierre Allain
Jean-Pierre Allain
Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (OBI) is defined as low plasma level of HBV DNA with undetectable HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) outside the preseroconversion window period. The mechanisms leading to OBI remain largely unknown. The potential role of specific amino acid substitutions in the S protein from OBI in HBsAg production and excretion was examined in vitro . HBsAg was quantified in culture supernatants and cell extracts of HuH-7 cells transiently transfected with plasmids containing the S gene of eight HBsAg + controls and 18 OBI clones. The intracellular (IC)/extracellular (EC) HBsAg production ratio was ∼1.0 for the majority of controls. Three IC/EC HBsAg patterns were observed in OBI strains clones: pattern 1, an IC/EC ratio of 1.0, was found in 5/18 OBI clones, pattern 2, detectable IC but low or undetectable EC HBsAg (IC/EC, 7.0 to 800), was found in 6/18 OBIs, and pattern 3, low or undetectable IC and EC HBsAg, was found in 7/18 clones. Intracellular immunofluorescence staining showed that in pattern 2, HBsAg was concentrated around the nucleus, suggesting retention in the endoplasmic reticulum. The substitution M75T, Y100S, or P178R was present in 4/6 pattern 2 OBI clones. Site-directed-mutagenesis-corrected mutations reversed HBsAg excretion to pattern 1 and, when introduced into a control clone, induced pattern 2 except for Y100S. In a control and several OBIs, variants of a given quasispecies expressed HBsAg according to different patterns. However, the P178R substitution present in all cloned sequences of two OBI strains may contribute significantly to the OBI phenotype.

1 February 2011 in Drug Resistance Updates
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HFHugh J. Field
Hugh J. Field
Subhajit BiswasSubhajit Biswas
Subhajit Biswas


25 February 2008 in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Subhajit BiswasSubhajit Biswas
Subhajit Biswas
GKGerald Kleymann
Gerald Kleymann
MSMihaiela Swift
Mihaiela Swift
LTLaurence S. Tiley
Laurence S. Tiley
JLJonathan Lyall
Jonathan Lyall
HFHugh J. Field
Hugh J. Field
To investigate the mechanism of action of the helicase–primase inhibitors (HPIs) BAY 57-1293 and BILS 22 BS by selection and characterization of drug-resistant herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 mutants. HSV-1 mutants were selected using BAY 57-1293 in Vero cells. Resistance mutations identified in the UL5 helicase or UL52 primase genes were validated by marker transfer. Cross-resistance to the structurally distinct BILS 22 BS was measured by ID50 determinations. (i) A single mutation (UL52: A899T) confers 43-fold resistance to BAY 57-1293, but does not confer any resistance to BILS 22 BS. (ii) A double mutant (UL52: A899T and UL5: K356T) is 2500-fold resistant to BAY 57-1293, which is more than 17 times the sum of fold-resistance due to the individual mutations, UL52: A899T (43-fold) and UL5: K356T (100-fold). (iii) Virus containing the single helicase mutation and the double mutant with mutations in both helicase and primase showed equal resistance to BILS 22 BS (70-fold). By measuring the relative inhibitory concentrations required to overcome particular mutations in the helicase and primase proteins, evidence was obtained that BAY 57-1293 interacts with both components of the helicase–primase complex to achieve maximum potency, whereas for BILS 22BS, this may not be the case. Furthermore, our observations suggest that BAY 57-1293 interacts simultaneously with UL5 and UL52. Overall, the results suggest that these two potent HPIs interact differently with the helicase–primase complex.