Igor F. Zhimulev

Dr. Igor F. Zhimulev


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 July 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IZIgor F. Zhimulev
Igor F. Zhimulev
TZTatyana Yu. Zykova
Tatyana Yu. Zykova
FGFyodor P. Goncharov
Fyodor P. Goncharov
VKVarvara A. Khoroshko
Varvara A. Khoroshko
ODOlga V. Demakova
Olga V. Demakova
EBElena S. Belyaeva
Elena S. Belyaeva
Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes display specific banding pattern; the underlying genetic organization of this pattern has remained elusive for many years. In the present paper, we analyze 32 cytology-mapped polytene chromosome interbands. We estimated molecular locations of these interbands, described their molecular and genetic organization and demonstrate that polytene chromosome interbands contain the 5′ ends of housekeeping genes. As a rule, interbands display preferential “head-to-head” orientation of genes. They are enriched for “broad” class promoters characteristic of housekeeping genes and associate with open chromatin proteins and Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) components. In two regions, 10A and 100B, coding sequences of genes whose 5′-ends reside in interbands map to constantly loosely compacted, early-replicating, so-called “grey” bands. Comparison of expression patterns of genes mapping to late-replicating dense bands vs genes whose promoter regions map to interbands shows that the former are generally tissue-specific, whereas the latter are represented by ubiquitously active genes. Analysis of RNA-seq data (modENCODE-FlyBase) indicates that transcripts from interband-mapping genes are present in most tissues and cell lines studied, across most developmental stages and upon various treatment conditions. We developed a special algorithm to computationally process protein localization data generated by the modENCODE project and show that Drosophila genome has about 5700 sites that demonstrate all the features shared by the interbands cytologically mapped to date.

11 October 2011 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TVTatyana Yu. Vatolina
Tatyana Yu. Vatolina
LBLidiya V. Boldyreva
Lidiya V. Boldyreva
ODOlga V. Demakova
Olga V. Demakova
SDSergey A. Demakov
Sergey A. Demakov
EKElena B. Kokoza
Elena B. Kokoza
IZIgor F. Zhimulev
Igor F. Zhimulev
Salivary gland polytene chromosomes demonstrate banding pattern, genetic meaning of which is an enigma for decades. Till now it is not known how to mark the band/interband borders on physical map of DNA and structures of polytene chromosomes are not characterized in molecular and genetic terms. It is not known either similar banding pattern exists in chromosomes of regular diploid mitotically dividing nonpolytene cells. Using the newly developed approach permitting to identify the interband material and localization data of interband-specific proteins from modENCODE and other genome-wide projects, we identify physical limits of bands and interbands in small cytological region 9F13-10B3 of the X chromosome in D. melanogaster, as well as characterize their general molecular features. Our results suggests that the polytene and interphase cell line chromosomes have practically the same patterns of bands and interbands reflecting, probably, the basic principle of interphase chromosome organization. Two types of bands have been described in chromosomes, early and late-replicating, which differ in many aspects of their protein and genetic content. As appeared, origin recognition complexes are located almost totally in the interbands of chromosomes.

10 January 2012 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBElena S. Belyaeva
Elena S. Belyaeva
FGFedor P. Goncharov
Fedor P. Goncharov
ODOlga V. Demakova
Olga V. Demakova
Tatyana KolesnikovaTatyana Kolesnikova
Tatyana Kolesnikova
LBLidiya V. Boldyreva
Lidiya V. Boldyreva
IZIgor F. Zhimulev
Igor F. Zhimulev
In D. melanogaster polytene chromosomes, intercalary heterochromatin (IH) appears as large dense bands scattered in euchromatin and comprises clusters of repressed genes. IH displays distinctly low gene density, indicative of their particular regulation. Genes embedded in IH replicate late in the S phase and become underreplicated. We asked whether localization and organization of these late-replicating domains is conserved in a distinct cell type. Using published comprehensive genome-wide chromatin annotation datasets (modENCODE and others), we compared IH organization in salivary gland cells and in a Kc cell line. We first established the borders of 60 IH regions on a molecular map, these regions containing underreplicated material and encompassing ∼12% of Drosophila genome. We showed that in Kc cells repressed chromatin constituted 97% of the sequences that corresponded to IH bands. This chromatin is depleted for ORC-2 binding and largely replicates late. Differences in replication timing between the cell types analyzed are local and affect only sub-regions but never whole IH bands. As a rule such differentially replicating sub-regions display open chromatin organization, which apparently results from cell-type specific gene expression of underlying genes. We conclude that repressed chromatin organization of IH is generally conserved in polytene and non-polytene cells. Yet, IH domains do not function as transcription- and replication-regulatory units, because differences in transcription and replication between cell types are not domain-wide, rather they are restricted to small “islands” embedded in these domains. IH regions can thus be defined as a special class of domains with low gene density, which have narrow temporal expression patterns, and so displaying relatively conserved organization.

20 February 2018 in Current Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TZTatyana Yu Zykova
Tatyana Yu Zykova
VLVictor Levitsky
Victor Levitsky
EBElena S. Belyaeva
Elena S. Belyaeva
IZIgor F. Zhimulev
Igor F. Zhimulev
This mini-review is devoted to the problem genetic meaning of main polytene chromosome structures – bands and interbands. Generally, densely packed chromatin forms black bands, moderately condensed regions form grey loose bands, whereas decondensed regions of the genome appear as interbands. Recent progress in the annotation of the Drosophila genome and epigenome has made it possible to compare the banding pattern and the structural organization of genes, as well as their activity. This was greatly aided by our ability to establish the borders of bands and interbands on the physical map, which allowed to perform comprehensive side-by-side comparisons of cytology, genetic and epigenetic maps and so uncover the association between the morphological structures and the functional domains of the genome. These studies largely conclude that interbands 5’-ends of housekeeping genes that are active across all cell types. Interbands are enriched with proteins involved in transcription and nucleosome remodeling, as well as with active histone modifications. Notably, most of the replication origins map to interband regions. As for grey loose bands adjacent to interbands, they typically host the bodies of house-keeping genes. Thus, the bipartite structure composed of an interband and an adjacent grey band functions as a standalone genetic unit. Finally, black bands harbor tissue-specific genes with narrow temporal and tissue expression profiles. Thus, the uniform and permanent activity of interbands combined with the inactivity of genes in bands forms the basis of the universal banding pattern observed in various Drosophila tissues.

13 November 2012 in Chromosoma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Tatyana KolesnikovaTatyana Kolesnikova
Tatyana Kolesnikova
OPOlga V. Posukh
Olga V. Posukh
EAEvgeniya N. Andreeva
Evgeniya N. Andreeva
DBDarya S. Bebyakina
Darya S. Bebyakina
AIAnton V. Ivankin
Anton V. Ivankin
IZIgor F. Zhimulev
Igor F. Zhimulev

9 March 2016 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
STSergei Titov
Sergei Titov
MIMikhail K Ivanov
Mikhail K Ivanov
EKElena V. Karpinskaya
Elena V. Karpinskaya
ETElena V. Tsivlikova
Elena V. Tsivlikova
SSSergei P. Shevchenko
Sergei P. Shevchenko
NKNikolay N. Kolesnikov
Nikolay N. Kolesnikov
Background The postoperative typing of thyroid lesions, which is instrumental in adequate patient treatment, is currently based on histologic examination. However, it depends on pathologist’s qualification and can be difficult in some cases. Numerous studies have shown that molecular markers such as microRNAs and somatic mutations may be useful to assist in these cases, but no consensus exists on the set of markers that is optimal for that purpose. The aim of the study was to discriminate between different thyroid neoplasms by RT-PCR, using a limited set of microRNAs selected from literature. Methods By RT-PCR we evaluated the relative levels of 15 microRNAs (miR-221, −222, −146b, −181b, −21, −187, −199b, −144, −192, −200a, −200b, −205, −141, −31, −375) and the presence of BRAF(V600E) mutation and RET-PTC1 translocation in surgically resected lesions from 208 patients from Novosibirsk oblast (Russia) with different types of thyroid neoplasms. Expression of each microRNA was normalized to adjacent non-tumor tissue. Three pieces of lesion tissue from each patient (39 goiters, 41 follicular adenomas, 16 follicular thyroid cancers, 108 papillary thyroid cancers, 4 medullary thyroid cancers) were analyzed independently to take into account method variation. Results The diagnostic classifier based on profiling of 13 microRNAs was proposed, with total estimated accuracy varying from 82.7 to 99 % for different nodule types. Relative expression of six microRNAs (miR-146b, −21, −221, −222, 375, −199b) appeared significantly different in BRAF(V600E)-positive samples (all classified as papillary thyroid carcinomas) compared to BRAF(V600E)-negative papillary carcinoma samples. Conclusions The results confirm practical feasibility of using molecular markers for typing of thyroid neoplasms and clarification of controversial cases.