Besides the wide use of engineered nanomaterials (NMs) in technical products, their applications are not only increasing in biotechnology and biomedicine, but also in the environmental field. While the physico-chemical properties and behaviour of NMs can be characterized accurately under idealized conditions, this is no longer the case in complex physiological or natural environments. Herein, proteins and other biomolecules rapidly bind to NMs, forming a protein/biomolecule corona that critically affects the NMs' (patho)biological and technical identities. As the corona impacts the in vitro and/or in vivo NM applications in humans and ecosystems, a mechanistic understanding of its relevance and of the biophysical forces regulating corona formation is mandatory. Based on recent insights, we here critically review and present an updated concept of corona formation and evolution. We comment on how corona signatures may be linked to effects at the nano–bio interface in physiological and environmental systems. In order to comprehensively analyse corona profiles and to mechanistically understand the coronas' biological/ecological impact, we present a tiered multidisciplinary approach. To stimulate progress in this field, we introduce the potential impact of the corona for NM–microbiome–(human)host interactions and the novel concept of ‘nanologicals’, i.e., the nanomaterial-specific targeting of molecular machines. We conclude by discussing the relevant challenges that still need to be resolved in this field.

Cytokines such as interferons (IFNs) activate signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs) via phosphorylation. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) and the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) CBP dynamically regulate STAT1 acetylation. Here we show that acetylation of STAT1 counteracts IFN-induced STAT1 phosphorylation, nuclear translocation, DNA binding, and target gene expression. Biochemical and genetic experiments altering the HAT/HDAC activity ratio and STAT1 mutants reveal that a phospho-acetyl switch regulates STAT1 signaling via CBP, HDAC3, and the T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase (TCP45). Strikingly, inhibition of STAT1 signaling via CBP-mediated acetylation is distinct from the functions of this HAT in transcriptional activation. STAT1 acetylation induces binding of TCP45, which catalyzes dephosphorylation and latency of STAT1. Our results provide a deeper understanding of the modulation of STAT1 activity. These findings reveal a new layer of physiologically relevant STAT1 regulation and suggest that a previously unidentified balance between phosphorylation and acetylation affects cytokine signaling.