Ji-su Park

Dr. Ji-su Park

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 December 2016 in Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HKH. D. Kim
H. D. Kim
JCJ. B. Choi
J. B. Choi
SYS. J. Yoo
S. J. Yoo
MCM. Y. Chang
M. Y. Chang
SLS. W. Lee
S. W. Lee
JPJi-su Park
Ji-su Park

11 September 2020 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJi-su Park
Ji-su Park
Youngjin JungYoungjin Jung
Youngjin Jung
GLGihyoun Lee
Gihyoun Lee
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of virtual reality-based cognitive–motor rehabilitation (VRCMR) on the rehabilitation motivation and cognitive function in older adults. This study enrolled 40 older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), living in the community. The subjects were randomly assigned to a VRCMR group (n = 20) or a conventional cognitive rehabilitation (CCR) group (n = 20). The VRCMR group underwent VRCMR using MOTOcog, a computer recognition program, whereas the CCR group underwent conventional cognitive rehabilitation, which included puzzles, wood blocks, card play, stick construction activity, and maze activity. Both interventions were performed 30 min per day, 5 days/week, for 6 weeks. This study performed a cognitive assessment using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale, Trail Making Test A and B (TMT-A/B), and Digit Span Test forward and backward (DST-forward/backward). In addition, a 0-to-10 numeric rating self-report scale was used to assess interest and motivation during the rehabilitation training. After the intervention, the VRCMR group showed a significantly greater improvement in the MoCA (p = 0.045), TMT-A (p = 0.039), TMT-B (p = 0.040), and DST-forward (p = 0.011) scores compared to the CCR group, but not in the DST-backward score (p = 0.424). In addition, subjects in the experimental group had significantly higher interest (p = 0.03) and motivation (p = 0.03) than those in the control group. Cohen’s d effect size was 0.4, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4, and 0.5 for the MoCA, TMT-A, TMT-B, DST-forward, and DST-backward tests, respectively. This study demonstrates that VRCMR enhances motivation for rehabilitation and cognitive function in older adults with MCI better than CCR.

1 January 2016 in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJong Ha Lee
Jong Ha Lee
HKHee-Sang Kim
Hee-Sang Kim
DYDong Hwan Yun
Dong Hwan Yun
JCJinmann Chon
Jinmann Chon
YHYoo Jin Han
Yoo Jin Han
YSYunsoo Soh
Yunsoo Soh
Lee JH, et al. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016 Aug;40(4):620-628. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.4.620

28 January 2019 in International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HPHee‐Su Park
Hee‐Su Park
DODong‐Hwan Oh
Dong‐Hwan Oh
TYTaehyung Yoon
Taehyung Yoon
JPJi-su Park
Ji-su Park

10 May 2021 in Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJi-su Park
Ji-su Park
NHNa-Kyoung Hwang
Na-Kyoung Hwang

15 March 2017 in Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJi-su Park
Ji-su Park
NHN. K. Hwang
N. K. Hwang
DOD. H. Oh
D. H. Oh
MCMoonyoung Chang
Moonyoung Chang