Andrej Varlagin

Dr. Andrej Varlagin

A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119071, Russia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 July 2020 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GPGilberto Pastorello
Gilberto Pastorello
CTCarlo Trotta
Carlo Trotta
ECEleonora Canfora
Eleonora Canfora
HCHousen Chu
Housen Chu
DCDanielle Christianson
Danielle Christianson
DPDario Papale
Dario Papale
The FLUXNET2015 dataset provides ecosystem-scale data on CO2, water, and energy exchange between the biosphere and the atmosphere, and other meteorological and biological measurements, from 212 sites around the globe (over 1500 site-years, up to and including year 2014). These sites, independently managed and operated, voluntarily contributed their data to create global datasets. Data were quality controlled and processed using uniform methods, to improve consistency and intercomparability across sites. The dataset is already being used in a number of applications, including ecophysiology studies, remote sensing studies, and development of ecosystem and Earth system models. FLUXNET2015 includes derived-data products, such as gap-filled time series, ecosystem respiration and photosynthetic uptake estimates, estimation of uncertainties, and metadata about the measurements, presented for the first time in this paper. In addition, 206 of these sites are for the first time distributed under a Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0) license. This paper details this enhanced dataset and the processing methods, now made available as open-source codes, making the dataset more accessible, transparent, and reproducible.

12 October 2010 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAndrew Richardson
Andrew Richardson
TBT. Andy Black
T. Andy Black
PCPhilippe Ciais
Philippe Ciais
NDNicolas Delbart
Nicolas Delbart
MFMark A. Friedl
Mark A. Friedl
AVAndrej Varlagin
Andrej Varlagin
We use eddy covariance measurements of net ecosystem productivity (NEP) from 21 FLUXNET sites (153 site-years of data) to investigate relationships between phenology and productivity (in terms of both NEP and gross ecosystem photosynthesis, GEP) in temperate and boreal forests. Results are used to evaluate the plausibility of four different conceptual models. Phenological indicators were derived from the eddy covariance time series, and from remote sensing and models. We examine spatial patterns (across sites) and temporal patterns (across years); an important conclusion is that it is likely that neither of these accurately represents how productivity will respond to future phenological shifts resulting from ongoing climate change. In spring and autumn, increased GEP resulting from an ‘extra’ day tends to be offset by concurrent, but smaller, increases in ecosystem respiration, and thus the effect on NEP is still positive. Spring productivity anomalies appear to have carry-over effects that translate to productivity anomalies in the following autumn, but it is not clear that these result directly from phenological anomalies. Finally, the productivity of evergreen needleleaf forests is less sensitive to phenology than is productivity of deciduous broadleaf forests. This has implications for how climate change may drive shifts in competition within mixed-species stands.

13 April 2014 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSebastiaan Luyssaert
Sebastiaan Luyssaert
MJMathilde Jammet
Mathilde Jammet
PSPaul Stoy
Paul Stoy
SEStephan Estel
Stephan Estel
JPJulia Pongratz
Julia Pongratz
ADA. Johannes Dolman
A. Johannes Dolman

1 April 2013 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPaul Stoy
Paul Stoy
MMMatthias Mauder
Matthias Mauder
TFThomas Foken
Thomas Foken
BMBarbara Marcolla
Barbara Marcolla
EBEva Boegh
Eva Boegh
AVAndrej Varlagin
Andrej Varlagin

9 November 2021 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WDWouter Dorigo
Wouter Dorigo
IHIrene Himmelbauer
Irene Himmelbauer
DADaniel Aberer
Daniel Aberer
LSLukas Schremmer
Lukas Schremmer
IPIvana Petrakovic
Ivana Petrakovic
RSRoberto Sabia
Roberto Sabia
In 2009, the International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN) was initiated as a community effort, funded by the European Space Agency, to serve as a centralised data hosting facility for globally available in situ soil moisture measurements (Dorigo et al., 2011b, a). The ISMN brings together in situ soil moisture measurements collected and freely shared by a multitude of organisations, harmonises them in terms of units and sampling rates, applies advanced quality control, and stores them in a database. Users can freely retrieve the data from this database through an online web portal (https://ismn.earth/en/, last access: 28 October 2021). Meanwhile, the ISMN has evolved into the primary in situ soil moisture reference database worldwide, as evidenced by more than 3000 active users and over 1000 scientific publications referencing the data sets provided by the network. As of July 2021, the ISMN now contains the data of 71 networks and 2842 stations located all over the globe, with a time period spanning from 1952 to the present. The number of networks and stations covered by the ISMN is still growing, and approximately 70 % of the data sets contained in the database continue to be updated on a regular or irregular basis. The main scope of this paper is to inform readers about the evolution of the ISMN over the past decade, including a description of network and data set updates and quality control procedures. A comprehensive review of the existing literature making use of ISMN data is also provided in order to identify current limitations in functionality and data usage and to shape priorities for the next decade of operations of this unique community-based data repository.

7 May 2018 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XLXing Li
Xing Li
JXJingfeng Xiao
Jingfeng Xiao
BHBinbin He
Binbin He
MAM. Altaf Arain
M. Altaf Arain
JBJason Beringer
Jason Beringer
AVAndrej Varlagin
Andrej Varlagin
Solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has been increasingly used as a proxy for terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP). Previous work mainly evaluated the relationship between satellite‐observed SIF and gridded GPP products both based on coarse spatial resolutions. Finer resolution SIF (1.3 km × 2.25 km) measured from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory‐2 (OCO‐2) provides the first opportunity to examine the SIF–GPP relationship at the ecosystem scale using flux tower GPP data. However, it remains unclear how strong the relationship is for each biome and whether a robust, universal relationship exists across a variety of biomes. Here we conducted the first global analysis of the relationship between OCO‐2 SIF and tower GPP for a total of 64 flux sites across the globe encompassing eight major biomes. OCO‐2 SIF showed strong correlations with tower GPP at both midday and daily timescales, with the strongest relationship observed for daily SIF at the 757 nm (R2 = 0.72,p < 0.0001). Strong linear relationships between SIF and GPP were consistently found for all biomes (R2 = 0.57–0.79,p < 0.0001) except evergreen broadleaf forests (R2 = 0.16,p < 0.05) at the daily timescale. A higher slope was found for C4grasslands and croplands than for C3ecosystems. The generally consistent slope of the relationship among biomes suggests a nearly universal rather than biome‐specific SIF–GPP relationship, and this finding is an important distinction and simplification compared to previous results. SIF was mainly driven by absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and was also influenced by environmental stresses (temperature and water stresses) that determine photosynthetic light use efficiency. OCO‐2 SIF generally had a better performance for predicting GPP than satellite‐derived vegetation indices and a light use efficiency model. The universal SIF–GPP relationship can potentially lead to more accurate GPP estimates regionally or globally. Our findings revealed the remarkable ability of finer resolution SIF observations from OCO‐2 and other new or future missions (e.g., TROPOMI, FLEX) for estimating terrestrial photosynthesis across a wide variety of biomes and identified their potential and limitations for ecosystem functioning and carbon cycle studies.