Jetty Chung-Yung Lee

Dr. Jetty Chung-Yung Lee

University of Hong Kong
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2010 in Free Radical Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRaymond C.S. Seet
Raymond C.S. Seet
Jetty Chung-Yung LeeJetty Chung-Yung Lee
Jetty Chung-Yung Lee
ELErle C.H. Lim
Erle C.H. Lim
JTJune J.H. Tan
June J.H. Tan
AQAmy M.L. Quek
Amy M.L. Quek
BHBarry Halliwell
Barry Halliwell

19 September 2017 in The FASEB Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jérôme RoyJérôme Roy
Jérôme Roy
JGJean‐Marie Galano
Jean‐Marie Galano
TDThierry Durand
Thierry Durand
JGJean‐Yves Le Guennec
Jean‐Yves Le Guennec
Jetty Chung-Yung LeeJetty Chung-Yung Lee
Jetty Chung-Yung Lee

15 July 2010 in Antioxidants & Redox Signaling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BHBarry Halliwell
Barry Halliwell
Jetty Chung-Yung LeeJetty Chung-Yung Lee
Jetty Chung-Yung Lee
The measurement of F 2 -isoprostanes by methods utilizing mass spectrometry is widely regarded as the best currently available biomarker of lipid peroxidation. F 2 -isoprostanes and their metabolites can be measured accurately in plasma, urine, and other body fluids using mass spectrometric techniques, and detailed protocols have been published in several papers. However, many clinical studies and intervention studies with diets or supplements, have employed single “spot” measurements of F 2 -isoprostanes on either plasma/serum or urine to estimate “oxidative stress.” This review examines the validity of the common assumption that plasma and urinary F 2 -isoprostane measurements are equivalent. It identifies scenarios where they may not be and where “spot” measurements can be misleading, with examples from the literature. We also discuss the controversial issue of whether and how F 2 -isoprostane levels in plasma should be standardized against lipids, and, if so, which lipids to use. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 13, 145–156.

1 October 2017 in Progress in Lipid Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJean-Marie Galano
Jean-Marie Galano
YLYiu Yiu Lee
Yiu Yiu Lee
COCamille Oger
Camille Oger
CVClaire VIGOR
Claire VIGOR
JVJoseph Vercauteren
Joseph Vercauteren
Jetty Chung-Yung LeeJetty Chung-Yung Lee
Jetty Chung-Yung Lee

1 June 2011 in Free Radical Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRaymond C.S. Seet
Raymond C.S. Seet
Jetty Chung-Yung LeeJetty Chung-Yung Lee
Jetty Chung-Yung Lee
WLWai Mun Loke
Wai Mun Loke
SHShan Hong Huang
Shan Hong Huang
HHHuiwen Huang
Huiwen Huang
BHBarry Halliwell
Barry Halliwell

9 June 2020 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLong Hin Li
Long Hin Li
Jetty Chung-Yung LeeJetty Chung-Yung Lee
Jetty Chung-Yung Lee
HLHo Hang Leung
Ho Hang Leung
WLWai Ching Lam
Wai Ching Lam
ZFZhongjie Fu
Zhongjie Fu
ALAmy Cheuk Yin Lo
Amy Cheuk Yin Lo
Lutein is one of the few xanthophyll carotenoids that is found in high concentration in the macula of human retina. As de novo synthesis of lutein within the human body is impossible, lutein can only be obtained from diet. It is a natural substance abundant in egg yolk and dark green leafy vegetables. Many basic and clinical studies have reported lutein’s anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory properties in the eye, suggesting its beneficial effects on protection and alleviation of ocular diseases such as age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, retinopathy of prematurity, myopia, and cataract. Most importantly, lutein is categorized as Generally Regarded as Safe (GRAS), posing minimal side-effects upon long term consumption. In this review, we will discuss the chemical structure and properties of lutein as well as its application and safety as a nutritional supplement. Finally, the effects of lutein consumption on the aforementioned eye diseases will be reviewed.