The feasibility of regional electric aviation to reduce environmental impact highly depends on technological advancements of energy storage techniques, available battery energy density, and high-power electric motor technologies. However, novel airframe technologies also strongly affect the feasibility of a regional electric aircraft. In this paper, the influence of novel technologies on the feasibility of regional electric aviation was investigated. Three game-changing technologies were applied to a novel all-electric regional aircraft: active flow control, active load alleviation, and novel materials and structure concepts. Initial conceptual design and mission analysis of the aircraft was performed using the aircraft design framework SUAVE, and the sensitivity of the most important technologies on the aircraft characteristics and performance were studied. Obtained results were compared against a reference ATR-72 aircraft. Results showed that an all-electric aircraft with airframe technologies might be designed with the maximum take-off weight increase of 50% starting from the battery pack energy density of 700 Wh/kg. The overall emission level of an all-electric aircraft with novel technologies is reduced by 81% compared to the ATR-72. On the other hand, novel technologies do not contribute to the reduction in Direct Operating Costs (DOC) starting from 700 Wh/kg if compared to an all-electric aircraft without technologies. An increase in DOC ranges from 43% to 30% depending on the battery energy density which creates a significant market obstacle for such type of airplanes. In addition, the aircraft shows high levels of energy consumption which concerns its energy efficiency. Finally, the sensitivity of DOC to novel technologies and sensitivities of aircraft characteristics to each technology were assessed.

The present work demonstrates the impact of future airframe and propulsion technologies on the sustainability of potential future medium-range commercial jets with design specifications similar to the Airbus A320-200. Advanced airframe and engine technologies include laminar flow control (LFC), active load alleviation, new materials and structures, and ultra-high bypass ratio turbofan engines. Two aircraft configurations with various design options were compared to determine potentially the best option for the mission profile, which tends to minimize the environmental impact. Each configuration was designed to balance the equivalent CO₂ emissions and Direct Operating Costs. Technology sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the significance of particular technology combinations and determine the ones that improve aircraft sustainability the most. All studies were performed at a conceptual design level using a multi-fidelity design approach to investigate the system-level effects of the technologies. The open-source aircraft design environment SUAVE was extended and integrated with other aircraft design and analysis tools to obtain all required correlations. The aircraft with advanced technologies showed an average reduction in equivalent CO₂ emissions of 36% and a 23% reduction in DOC compared to the reference aircraft for a similar mission profile, although aircraft with future technologies may have a 43% higher production cost. The given results indicate that the application of technologies may be commercially successful if technologies achieve expected performance values, despite high development costs. Finally, the technology sensitivity analysis demonstrated the most significant influence of engine-related technologies and laminar flow control compared to other technologies considered in this research. Depending on design and integration complexities, engine technologies can be more achievable in the near future and can substantially reduce the overall emission level.

The German Cluster of Excellence SE²A (Sustainable and Energy Efficient Aviation) is established in order to investigate the influence of game-changing technologies on the energy efficiency of future transport aircraft. In this paper, the preliminary investigation of the four game-changing technologies active flow control, active load alleviation, boundary layer ingestion, and novel materials and structure concepts on the performance of a long-range Blended Wing Body (BWB) aircraft is presented. The BWB that was equipped with the mentioned technologies was designed and optimized using the multi-fidelity aircraft design code SUAVE with a connection to the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code SU2. The conceptual design of the BWB aircraft is performed within the SUAVE framework, where the influence of the new technologies is investigated. In the second step, the initially designed BWB aircraft is improved by an aerodynamic shape optimization while using the SU2 CFD code. In the third step, the performance of the optimized aircraft is evaluated again using the SUAVE code. The results showed more than 60% reduction in the aircraft fuel burn when compared to the Boeing 777.

Present work investigates the potential of a long-range commercial blended wing body configuration powered by hydrogen combustion engines with future airframe and propulsion technologies. Future technologies include advanced materials, load alleviation techniques, boundary layer ingestion, and ultra-high bypass ratio engines. The hydrogen combustion configuration was compared to the configuration powered by kerosene with respect to geometric properties, performance characteristics, energy demand, equivalent CO₂ emissions, and Direct Operating Costs. In addition, technology sensitivity studies were performed to assess the potential influence of each technology on the configuration. A multi-fidelity sizing methodology using low- and mid-fidelity methods for rapid configuration sizing was created to assess the configuration and perform robust analyses and multi-disciplinary optimizations. To assess potential uncertainties of the fidelity of aerodynamic analysis tools, high-fidelity aerodynamic analysis and optimization framework MACH-Aero was used for additional verification. Comparison of hydrogen and kerosene blended wing body aircraft showed a potential reduction of equivalent CO₂ emission by 15% and 81% for blue and green hydrogen compared to the kerosene blended wing body and by 44% and 88% with respect to a conventional B777-300ER aircraft. Advancements in future technologies also significantly affect the geometric layout of aircraft. Boundary layer ingestion and ultra-high bypass ratio engines demonstrated the highest potential for fuel reduction, although both technologies conflict with each other. However, operating costs of hydrogen aircraft could establish a significant problem if pessimistic and base hydrogen price scenarios are achieved for blue and green hydrogen respectively. Finally, configurational problems featured by classical blended wing body aircraft are magnified for the hydrogen case due to the significant volume requirements to store hydrogen fuel.

The present work demonstrates a comparative study of hydrogen fuel cells and combustion aircraft to investigate the potential of fuel cells as a visionary propulsion system for radically more sustainable medium- to long-range commercial aircraft. The study, which considered future airframe and propulsion technologies under the Se2A project, was conducted to quantify potential emissions and costs associated with such aircraft and to determine the benefits and drawbacks of each energy system option for different market segments. Future technologies considered in the present work include laminar flow control, active load alleviation, new materials and structures, ultra-high bypass ratio turbofan engines, more efficient thermal management systems, and superconducting electric motors. A multi-fidelity initial sizing framework with coupled constraint and mission analysis blocks was used for parametric airplane sizing and calculations of all necessary characteristics. Analyses performed for three reference aircraft of different sizes and ranges concluded that fuel-cell aircraft could have operating cost increases in the order of 30% compared to hydrogen combustion configurations and were caused by substantial weight and fuel burn increases. In-flight changes in emissions of fuel cell configurations at high altitudes were progressively reduced from medium-range to long-range segments from being similar to hydrogen combustion for medium-range to 24% for large long-range aircraft, although fuel cell aircraft consume 22–30% more fuel than combustion aircraft. Results demonstrate a positive environmental impact of fuel cell propulsion for long-range applications, the possibilities of being a more emission-universal solution, if desired optimistic technology performance metrics are satisfied. The study also demonstrates progressively increasing technology requirements for larger aircraft, making the long-range application’s feasibility more challenging. Therefore, substantial development of fuel cell technologies for long-range aircraft is imperative. The article also emphasizes the importance of airframe and propulsion technologies and the necessity of green hydrogen production to achieve desired emissions.

Present work performs a comparative study of two medium-range commercial jets with future airframe and propulsion technologies powered by hydrogen and kerosene fuel to achieve a substantial reduction in overall aviation emissions. The study aims to investigate the cumulative effect of different energy networks combined with airframe efficiency gains achieved by aircraft-related technologies to suggest a better option for the potential next-generation commercial aircraft similar to the Airbus A320. Advanced airframe and engine technologies include laminar flow control, active load alleviation, new materials and structures, and ultra-high bypass ratio turbofan engines. Two aircraft with hydrogen and kerosene propulsion systems were sized to compare their performance characteristics, equivalent CO₂ emission, and direct operating costs. The design was performed using a multi-fidelity approach and included the effects of future airframe technologies and the hydrogen propulsion system. The design comparison showed a significant contribution of airframe and propulsion technologies in achieving more environmentally friendly aircraft. The green hydrogen option showed a 41–63% reduction in overall emissions compared to the kerosene aircraft depending on flight conditions while the blue hydrogen variant achieved a 21–26% reduction level. A rather optimistic price scenario shall be met to enable an operational benefit of green hydrogen while the blue hydrogen variant has more potential of being economically acceptable by the market. In circumstances when operating costs drive the decision-making more than emissions, kerosene may be a more favorable option as a compromise between emission and costs, given the positive effect of airframe and propulsion technologies.