The past few decades have brought tremendous insight into the molecular and pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for thrombus generation. For a clinician, it is usually sufficient to explain the incident of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with provoking factors such as trauma with vascular injury, immobilization, hormonal factors, or inherited or acquired coagulation defects. About half of DVTs are, however, lacking such triggers and are called unprovoked. Venous stasis and hypoxia at the valve sinus level may start a chain of reactions. The concept of immunothrombosis has added a new dimension to the old etiological triad of venous stasis, vessel wall injury, and changes in blood components. This is particularly important in COVID-19, where hyperinflammation, cytokines, and neutrophil extracellular traps are associated with the formation of microthrombi in the lungs. To better understand the mechanisms behind DVT and reach beyond the above-mentioned simplifications, animal models and clinical epidemiological studies have brought insight into the complex interplay between leukocytes, platelets, endothelium, cytokines, complements, and coagulation factors and inhibitors. These pathways and the interplay will be reviewed here, as well as the roles of cancer, anticancer drugs, and congenital thrombophilic defects on the molecular level in hypercoagulability and venous thromboembolism.

COVID-19 is placing considerable strain on healthcare systems. Disaster and military medicine specialists were involved in the outbreak in Italy, after many units were overwhelmed. Health providers were caught off guard and personnel was unprepared to face this unprecedented threat. Local decisions accelerated the rate of the spread. Many countries declared a state of emergency and lockdown to contain the exponential transmission of the disease. The purpose of this review is to suggest quick key points of strategies to implement in obstetric units without delay to respond to the oncoming wave, based on experience and feedback from the field. It is essential in an emergency situation to understand what is at stake and prepare maternity wards in the best possible way.

Newborns are the most vulnerable patients for thrombosis development among all children, with critically ill and premature infants being in the highest risk group. The upward trend in the rate of neonatal thrombosis could be attributed to progress in the treatment of severe neonatal conditions and the increased survival in premature babies. There are physiological differences in the hemostatic system between neonates and adults. Neonates differ in concentrations and rate of synthesis of most coagulation factors, turnover rates, the ability to regulate thrombin and plasmin, and in greater variability compared to adults. Natural inhibitors of coagulation (protein C, protein S, antithrombin, heparin cofactor II) and vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors (factors II, VII, IX, X) are low, but factor VIII and von Willebrand factor are elevated. Newborns have decreased fibrinolytic activity. In the healthy neonate, the balance is maintained but appears more easily converted into thrombosis. Neonatal hemostasis has less buffer capacity, and almost 95% of thrombosis is provoked. Different triggering risk factors are responsible for thrombosis in neonates, but the most important risk factors for thrombosis are central catheters, fluid fluctuations, liver dysfunction, and septic and inflammatory conditions. Low-molecular-weight heparins are the agents of choice for anticoagulation.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) can induce fetal loss in experimental animal models. Human studies did find hypocomplementemia associated with pregnancy complications in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), but these results are not unanimously confirmed. To investigate if the detection of low C3/C4 could be considered a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) in APS and aPL carriers’ pregnancies we performed a multicenter study including 503 pregnancies from 11 Italian and 1 Russian centers. Data in women with APS and asymptomatic carriers with persistently positive aPL and preconception complement levels were available for 260 pregnancies. In pregnancies with low preconception C3/C4, a significantly higher prevalence of pregnancy losses was observed (p = 0.008). A subgroup analysis focusing on triple aPL-positive patients found that preconception low C3 and/or C4 levels were associated with an increased rate of pregnancy loss (p = 0.05). Our findings confirm that decreased complement levels before pregnancy are associated with increased risk of APO. This has been seen only in women with triple aPL positivity, indeed single or double positivity does not show this trend. Complement levels are cheap and easy to be measured therefore they could represent a useful aid to identify patients at increased risk of pregnancy loss.