La investigación realizada tiene por objetivo conocer, analizar y describir el proceso de adaptación de las metodologías didácticas activas ante el cambio de la docencia presencial a la docencia online, las actitudes del profesorado y sus valoraciones en torno a la experiencia vivida durante la pandemia del Covid-2019. La metodología de investigación ha sido cualitativa, realizando un estudio multicaso en cuatro grupos de estudiantes de grado y posgrado en la Universidad de Huelva. Las materias y grupos fueron seleccionados intencionalmente por estar basadas en metodologías activas, y estrategias y actividades prácticas para atender a la diversidad del alumnado, basándose así en los principios de la justicia social. El artículo plantea dilemas y alternativas de tres docentes universitarias en el desarrollo de la docencia ante la sobrevenida pandemia. Los resultados muestran valoraciones positivas por parte del profesorado, aunque se analizan también las dificultades. Destacan un aumento en su formación docente y una evolución efectiva en su desarrollo profesional, además de incrementar su labor investigadora centrada en la docencia. Las metodologías activas utilizadas presencialmente se han sustituido por otras estrategias y recursos didácticos que han permitido una docencia virtual basada en un proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje activo y enriquecedor para todos los estudiantes.

The aim of the research is to pinpoint which leadership-related factors affect school success, specifically focusing on features and strategies used by the principals. The work follows the International Successful School Principalship Project methodology in two case studies in Andalusia (Spain). Both schools (with differentiated environments) are classed by the research as ‘invisible or visible school’, depending on the evolution and recognition of their success. Case A is a high-performing and declining school (invisible) and Case B is a low-performing and rising school (visible). The results emphasise the importance of the socioeconomic and cultural school context and the characteristics and type of leadership exercised by principals in their relationships with the environment, academic outcomes of the pupils and the school’s innovation process. The principal’s leadership is also crucial for acknowledgement of school results.

It has been suggested that physical education (PE) teachers hold strong anti-fat attitudes and that these can have an impact on the health of their students. In this study, we compare the attitudes and stereotypes towards obesity of PE teachers with those of their colleagues who teach mathematics. In addition, we evaluated the association between the teachers’ anti-fat biases and the level of physical activity (PA) of their students. The sample consisted of 81 PE teachers and 75 mathematics teachers. The adolescent sample consisted of 1792 secondary school students. The assessment of attitudes and stereotypes was conducted with the Implicit Association Test and the Anti-Fat Attitudes questionnaire. The PA level of the adolescents was determined by a self-administered instrument. PE and mathematics teachers showed similar biases, except for the automatic obesity–laziness association, which was stronger for PE teachers than for mathematics teachers. These distinctive implicit stereotypes of PE teachers were also significant predictors of the lack of PA in adolescents. We recommend the use of interventions aimed at reducing non-traditional forms of prejudice in teachers.

We present the validation of a questionnaire for compulsory secondary school students (seventh to tenth grade), designated “Educational learning environments for ESO pupils” (CEApA_ESO), for the purpose of evaluating learning environments. Although many instruments have been developed in this area, our work attempts to comprehensively cover some factors that most influence learning environments from the students’ perspective. Therefore, we included physical, learning, teaching and motivational elements, by adapting different already-validated scales to our intended overall approach and the Spanish context. We conducted a pilot study with 207 students from four grades (two classes per educational level). We performed descriptive and factor analyses with maximum likelihood extraction method and varimax rotation to identify factors underlying each scale. The factors extracted from each scale were used to evaluate the fit of the model, using the AMOS v.18 software for structural equation analysis, taking as reference the criteria set by Byrne (Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, Taylor & Francis Group, 2010) and Kline (Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, The Guilford Press, 2010) (CMIN/DF between 2 and 5, CFI and IFI > 0.9, RMSEA < 0.06 and HOELTER > 200). Finally, we present the factorial validity of the complete scale and analyse the internal consistency of the scale and its subscales using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. This instrument, with adequate psychometric properties, offers educators and researchers a valid tool for assessing the learning environments of their schools.

La atención a la diversidad es uno de los mayores retos de la educación hoy, y la dirección escolar y liderazgo que se ejerza, es un eje clave. En este trabajo queremos profundizar, desde la perspectiva de las familias, sobre cómo perciben las prácticas directivas desde el prisma de la inclusión escolar. Para ello, aplicamos el cuestionario LEI-Q “liderando la educación inclusiva en centros de educación obligatoria”- Familia validado por López-López et al. (2021), a una muestra representativa de familias de 4 provincias andaluzas (España) dentro de un proyecto más amplio. Los análisis realizados han sido análisis estadísticos descriptivos e inferenciales. Los principales resultados y conclusiones apuntan a que los líderes escolares en general, implementan acciones inclusivas, aunque todavía deben mejorar en su desempeño, desde las percepciones de las familias. Parece que las percepciones respecto a las acciones de apertura a la comunidad y de consideración de los centros como espacios inclusivos varían en función de la titularidad de los centros y el nivel socioeconómico de las zonas. Esto nos ofrece una visión de la realidad de las escuelas sobre la que debemos seguir trabajando.