Neta Luria

Dr. Neta Luria


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 May 2020 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKChen Klap
Chen Klap
NLNeta Luria
Neta Luria
ESelisheva smith
elisheva smith
EBElena Bakelman
Elena Bakelman
EBEduard Belausov
Eduard Belausov
Aviv DombrovskyAviv Dombrovsky
Aviv Dombrovsky
During 2019, tomato fruits showing viral-like symptoms of marbled yellow spots were abundant in Israel. The new symptoms were distinctive from those typical of tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV) infection but resembled symptoms of pepino mosaic virus (PepMV) infection. RT-PCR analysis and the serological tests (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, western blot and in situ immunofluorescence) revealed and confirmed the presence of both the tobamovirus ToBRFV and the potexvirus PepMV in the symptomatic fruits. A mixture of rod-like and filamentous particles, characteristic of viruses belonging to tobamovirus and potexvirus genera, was visualized by transmission electron microscopy of the tomato fruit viral extract. Sanger sequencing of amplified PepMV-coat protein gene segments showed ~98% sequence identity to the Chilean (CH2)-strain. In a biological assay testing the contribution of traded infected tomatoes to the establishment of tomato plant disease, we applied direct and indirect inoculation modes using Tm-22-resistant tomato plants. The results, assessed by disease symptom development along with serological and molecular analyses, showed that the ToBRFV and PepMV co-infected fruits were an effective inoculum source for disease spread only when fruits were damaged. Importantly, intact fruits did not spread the viral disease. These results added a new factor to disease epidemiology of these viruses.

1 March 2020 in Plant Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YGYoav Giladi
Yoav Giladi
LHLior Hadad
Lior Hadad
NLNeta Luria
Neta Luria
WCWhitney Cranshaw
Whitney Cranshaw
OLObed Lachman
Obed Lachman
Aviv DombrovskyAviv Dombrovsky
Aviv Dombrovsky
In industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) fields located in North Fork Valley, Delta County Colorado USA, plants bearing symptoms of stunted growth and yellowing leaves were observed in each growing ...

12 September 2022 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OEOr Eldan
Or Eldan
AOArie Ofir
Arie Ofir
NLNeta Luria
Neta Luria
CKChen Klap
Chen Klap
OLOded Lachman
Oded Lachman
Aviv DombrovskyAviv Dombrovsky
Aviv Dombrovsky
The tobamovirus tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV) infects tomato plants harboring the Tm-22 resistance allele, which corresponds with tobamoviruses’ avirulence (Avr) gene encoding the movement protein to activate a resistance-associated hypersensitive response (HR). ToBRFV has caused severe damage to tomato crops worldwide. Unlike tomato plants, pepper plants harboring the L resistance alleles, which correspond with the tobamovirus Avr gene encoding the coat protein, have shown HR manifestations upon ToBRFV infection. We have found that ToBRFV inoculation of a wide range of undefined pepper plant varieties could cause a “hypersensitive-like cell death” response, which was associated with ToBRFV transient systemic infection dissociated from disease symptom manifestations on fruits. Susceptibility of pepper plants harboring L1, L3, or L4 resistance alleles to ToBRFV infection following HRs was similarly transient and dissociated from disease symptom manifestations on fruits. Interestingly, ToBRFV stable infection of a pepper cultivar not harboring the L gene was also not associated with disease symptoms on fruits, although ToBRFV was localized in the seed epidermis, parenchyma, and endothelium, which borders the endosperm, indicating that a stable infection of maternal origin of these tissues occurred. Pepper plants with systemic ToBRFV infection could constitute an inoculum source for adjacently grown tomato plants.

4 August 2017 in BMC Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBShiri Barad
Shiri Barad
NSNoa Sela
Noa Sela
ADAmit K. Dubey
Amit K. Dubey
DKDilip Kumar
Dilip Kumar
NLNeta Luria
Neta Luria
Dov PruskyDov Prusky
Dov Prusky
The destructive phytopathogen Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causes anthracnose disease in fruit. During host colonization, it secretes ammonia, which modulates environmental pH and regulates gene expression, contributing to pathogenicity. However, the effect of host pH environment on pathogen colonization has never been evaluated. Development of an isogenic tomato line with reduced expression of the gene for acidity, SlPH (Solyc10g074790.1.1), enabled this analysis. Total RNA from C. gloeosporioides colonizing wild-type (WT) and RNAi–SlPH tomato lines was sequenced and gene-expression patterns were compared. C. gloeosporioides inoculation of the RNAi–SlPH line with pH 5.96 compared to the WT line with pH 4.2 showed 30% higher colonization and reduced ammonia accumulation. Large-scale comparative transcriptome analysis of the colonized RNAi–SlPH and WT lines revealed their different mechanisms of colonization-pattern activation: whereas the WT tomato upregulated 13-LOX (lipoxygenase), jasmonic acid and glutamate biosynthesis pathways, it downregulated processes related to chlorogenic acid biosynthesis II, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and hydroxycinnamic acid tyramine amide biosynthesis; the RNAi–SlPH line upregulated UDP-D-galacturonate biosynthesis I and free phenylpropanoid acid biosynthesis, but mainly downregulated pathways related to sugar metabolism, such as the glyoxylate cycle and L-arabinose degradation II. Comparison of C. gloeosporioides gene expression during colonization of the WT and RNAi–SlPH lines showed that the fungus upregulates ammonia and nitrogen transport and the gamma-aminobutyric acid metabolic process during colonization of the WT, while on the RNAi–SlPH tomato, it mainly upregulates the nitrate metabolic process. Modulation of tomato acidity and pH had significant phenotypic effects on C. gloeosporioides development. The fungus showed increased colonization on the neutral RNAi–SlPH fruit, and limited colonization on the WT acidic fruit. The change in environmental pH resulted in different defense responses for the two tomato lines. Interestingly, the WT line showed upregulation of jasmonate pathways and glutamate accumulation, supporting the reduced symptom development and increased ammonia accumulation, as the fungus might utilize glutamate to accumulate ammonia and increase environmental pH for better expression of pathogenicity factors. This was not found in the RNAi–SlPH line which downregulated sugar metabolism and upregulated the phenylpropanoid pathway, leading to host susceptibility.

1 September 2025 in Plant Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OMOri Molad
Ori Molad
DLDiana Leibman
Diana Leibman
NLNeta Luria
Neta Luria
NSNoa Sela
Noa Sela
ESelisheva smith
elisheva smith
Aviv DombrovskyAviv Dombrovsky
Aviv Dombrovsky
Tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV) is a seedborne, soilborne, mechanically transmitted tobamovirus infecting tomato plants worldwide. Tobamovirus-contaminated soil occurring after a growth cycle of infected crops constitutes a primary source of infection for newly planted seedlings, severely affecting crops under the common practice of monoculture farming. For our studies of interrelationships between ToBRFV-infected plants and virus preservation in soil, we have grown ToBRFV-inoculated wild tomato species for 5 months and analyzed ToBRFV preservation in soil after plant removal. Soil virion RNA subjected to a high-throughput sequencing analysis revealed the presence of a single isolate with 99.92% similarity to wildtype (WT) ToBRFV. The isolate recovered from the soil contained one nonsynonymous mutation at the movement protein resulting in A134T amino acid substitution. ToBRFV-A134T was stable in Tm-22-resistant tomato plants (e.g., cv. Ikram), and in coinoculation experiments with ToBRFV-WT, both isolates were present. The effect of ToBRFV-A134T on tomato plants was studied in comparison with ToBRFV-WT infections. Whereas ToBRFV-WT-infected plants showed mottling-mosaic leaves occasionally associated with shoestring-like symptoms, ToBRFV-A134T-infected plants’ leaves showed severe shoestring-like symptoms and unique fern-like leaflets on shoestring-like leaf backbones. Analyses of genes involved in shoestring-like symptoms in Tm-22-resistant tomato plants by RT-qPCR revealed differential relative expression of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 6b, Dicer-like 4, and Dicer-like 2b in ToBRFV-WT-infected Ikram plants compared with ToBRFV-A134T-infected plants. The results may indicate that different mechanisms are involved in the regulation of severe shoestring-like symptoms induced by ToBRFV-A134T compared with symptoms induced by ToBRFV-WT.

28 February 2024 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VRvictoria reingold
victoria reingold
AEAvi Eliyahu
Avi Eliyahu
NLNeta Luria
Neta Luria
DLDiana Leibman
Diana Leibman
NSNoa Sela
Noa Sela
Aviv DombrovskyAviv Dombrovsky
Aviv Dombrovsky
During our search for aphid-pathogenic viruses, a comovirus was isolated from wild asymptomatic Brassica hirta (white mustard) plants harboring a dense population of Brevicoryne brassicae aphids. The transmission-electron-microscopy visualization of purified virions revealed icosahedral particles. The virus was mechanically transmitted to plants belonging to Brassicaceae, Solanaceae, Amaranthaceae, and Fabaceae families, showing unique ringspot symptoms only on B. rapa var. perviridis plants. The complete viral genome, comprised of two RNA segments, was sequenced. RNA1 and RNA2 contained 5921 and 3457 nucleotides, respectively, excluding the 3′ terminal poly-adenylated tails. RNA1 and RNA2 each had one open-reading frame encoding a polyprotein of 1850 and 1050 amino acids, respectively. The deduced amino acids at the Pro-Pol region, delineated between a conserved CG motif of 3C-like proteinase and a GDD motif of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, shared a 96.5% and 90% identity with the newly identified Apis mellifera-associated comovirus and Arabidopsis latent virus 1 (ArLV1), respectively. Because ArLV1 was identified early in 2018, the B. hirta comovirus was designated as ArLV1-IL-Bh. A high-throughput-sequencing-analyses of the extracted RNA from managed honeybees and three abundant wild bee genera, mining bees, long-horned bees, and masked bees, sampled while co-foraging in a Mediterranean ecosystem, allowed the assembly of ArLV1-IL-Bh, suggesting pollinators’ involvement in comovirus spread in weeds.