Josep Maria Haro

Josep Maria Haro


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2012 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMChristopher J L Murray
Christopher J L Murray
TVTheo Vos
Theo Vos
RLRafael Lozano
Rafael Lozano
MNMohsen Naghavi
Mohsen Naghavi
AFAbraham D Flaxman
Abraham D Flaxman
ALAlan D Lopez
Alan D Lopez

1 December 2012 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TVTheo Vos
Theo Vos
AFAbraham D Flaxman
Abraham D Flaxman
MNMohsen Naghavi
Mohsen Naghavi
RLRafael Lozano
Rafael Lozano
CMCatherine Michaud
Catherine Michaud
CMChristopher Jl Murray
Christopher Jl Murray

1 August 2015 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TVTheo Vos
Theo Vos
RBRyan M Barber
Ryan M Barber
BBBrad Bell
Brad Bell
ABAmelia Bertozzi-Villa
Amelia Bertozzi-Villa
SBStan Biryukov
Stan Biryukov
CMChristopher Jl Murray
Christopher Jl Murray

2 June 2004 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KDKoen Demyttenaere
Koen Demyttenaere
RBRonny Bruffaerts
Ronny Bruffaerts
JPJose Posada-Villa
Jose Posada-Villa
IGIsabelle Gasquet
Isabelle Gasquet
VKViviane Kovess
Viviane Kovess
WCWHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium
WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium
Although surveys of mental disorders have been carried out since the end of World War II,1-3 cross-national comparisons were hampered by inconsistencies in diagnostic methods. This situation changed in the 1980s with the development of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS), the first psychiatric diagnostic interview designed for use by lay interviewers.4 The DIS was initially used in the US Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) Study and subsequently in similar surveys carried out in other countries in the 1980s.5-8 The results were brought together in the early 1990s in a series of important cross-national articles that showed mental disorders to be highly prevalent.9-12 Indeed, prevalence of mental disorder was generally higher than that of any other class of chronic conditions.13,14 This was striking in light of research documenting that mental disorders have greater effects on role functioning than many serious chronic physical illnesses.13,15,16 A second generation of cross-national psychiatric surveys was carried out in the 1990s17-24 using a more elaborate interview, the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI).25 Although prevalence varied widely, more than one third of respondents typically met criteria for a lifetime CIDI disorder.26 Survey-specific treatment questions showed uniformly that most mental disorders were untreated.27,28

1 December 2015 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MFMohammad H Forouzanfar
Mohammad H Forouzanfar
LALily Alexander
Lily Alexander
HAH Ross Anderson
H Ross Anderson
VBVictoria F Bachman
Victoria F Bachman
SBStan Biryukov
Stan Biryukov
CMChristopher J Murray
Christopher J Murray
The Global Burden of Disease, Injuries, and Risk Factor study 2013 (GBD 2013) is the first of a series of annual updates of the GBD. Risk factor quantification, particularly of modifiable risk factors, can help to identify emerging threats to population health and opportunities for prevention. The GBD 2013 provides a timely opportunity to update the comparative risk assessment with new data for exposure, relative risks, and evidence on the appropriate counterfactual risk distribution. Attributable deaths, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) have been estimated for 79 risks or clusters of risks using the GBD 2010 methods. Risk-outcome pairs meeting explicit evidence criteria were assessed for 188 countries for the period 1990-2013 by age and sex using three inputs: risk exposure, relative risks, and the theoretical minimum risk exposure level (TMREL). Risks are organised into a hierarchy with blocks of behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks at the first level of the hierarchy. The next level in the hierarchy includes nine clusters of related risks and two individual risks, with more detail provided at levels 3 and 4 of the hierarchy. Compared with GBD 2010, six new risk factors have been added: handwashing practices, occupational exposure to trichloroethylene, childhood wasting, childhood stunting, unsafe sex, and low glomerular filtration rate. For most risks, data for exposure were synthesised with a Bayesian meta-regression method, DisMod-MR 2.0, or spatial-temporal Gaussian process regression. Relative risks were based on meta-regressions of published cohort and intervention studies. Attributable burden for clusters of risks and all risks combined took into account evidence on the mediation of some risks such as high body-mass index (BMI) through other risks such as high systolic blood pressure and high cholesterol. All risks combined account for 57·2% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 55·8-58·5) of deaths and 41·6% (40·1-43·0) of DALYs. Risks quantified account for 87·9% (86·5-89·3) of cardiovascular disease DALYs, ranging to a low of 0% for neonatal disorders and neglected tropical diseases and malaria. In terms of global DALYs in 2013, six risks or clusters of risks each caused more than 5% of DALYs: dietary risks accounting for 11·3 million deaths and 241·4 million DALYs, high systolic blood pressure for 10·4 million deaths and 208·1 million DALYs, child and maternal malnutrition for 1·7 million deaths and 176·9 million DALYs, tobacco smoke for 6·1 million deaths and 143·5 million DALYs, air pollution for 5·5 million deaths and 141·5 million DALYs, and high BMI for 4·4 million deaths and 134·0 million DALYs. Risk factor patterns vary across regions and countries and with time. In sub-Saharan Africa, the leading risk factors are child and maternal malnutrition, unsafe sex, and unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing. In women, in nearly all countries in the Americas, north Africa, and the Middle East, and in many other high-income countries, high BMI is the leading risk factor, with high systolic blood pressure as the leading risk in most of Central and Eastern Europe and south and east Asia. For men, high systolic blood pressure or tobacco use are the leading risks in nearly all high-income countries, in north Africa and the Middle East, Europe, and Asia. For men and women, unsafe sex is the leading risk in a corridor from Kenya to South Africa. Behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks can explain half of global mortality and more than one-third of global DALYs providing many opportunities for prevention. Of the larger risks, the attributable burden of high BMI has increased in the past 23 years. In view of the prominence of behavioural risk factors, behavioural and social science research on interventions for these risks should be strengthened. Many prevention and primary care policy options are available now to act on key risks. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

1 February 2008 in The British Journal of Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MNMatthew K. Nock
Matthew K. Nock
GBGuilherme Borges
Guilherme Borges
EBEvelyn J. Bromet
Evelyn J. Bromet
JAJordi Alonso
Jordi Alonso
MAMatthias Angermeyer
Matthias Angermeyer
DWDavid Williams
David Williams
Background: Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide; however, the prevalence and risk factors for the immediate precursors to suicide – suicidal ideation, plans and attempts – are not well-known, especially in low- and middle-income countries.Aims: To report on the prevalence and risk factors for suicidal behaviours across 17 countries.Method: A total of 84 850 adults were interviewed regarding suicidal behaviours and socio-demographic and psychiatric risk factors.Results: The cross-national lifetime prevalence of suicidal ideation, plans, and attempts is 9.2% (s.e.=0.1), 3.1% (s.e.=0.1), and 2.7% (s.e.=0.1). Across all countries, 60% of transitions from ideation to plan and attempt occur within the first year after ideation onset. Consistent cross-national risk factors included being female, younger, less educated, unmarried and having a mental disorder. Interestingly, the strongest diagnostic risk factors were mood disorders in high-income countries but impulse control disorders in low- and middle-income countries.Conclusion: There is cross-national variability in the prevalence of suicidal behaviours, but strong consistency in the characteristics and risk factors for these behaviours. These findings have significant implications for the prediction and prevention of suicidal behaviours.