Nihal Engin VRANA

Dr. Nihal Engin VRANA


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 April 2014 in Biofabrication
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLuiz E Bertassoni
Luiz E Bertassoni
Juliana CardosoJuliana Cardoso
Juliana Cardoso
VMVijayan Manoharan
Vijayan Manoharan
ACAna L Cristino
Ana L Cristino
NBNupura S Bhise
Nupura S Bhise
Ali  KhademhosseiniAli Khademhosseini
Ali Khademhosseini
Fabrication of three dimensional (3D) organoids with controlled microarchitectures has been shown to enhance tissue functionality. Bioprinting can be used to precisely position cells and cell-laden materials to generate controlled tissue architecture. Therefore, it represents an exciting alternative for organ fabrication. Despite the rapid progress in the field, the development of printing processes that can be used to fabricate macroscale tissue constructs from ECM-derived hydrogels has remained a challenge. Here we report a strategy for bioprinting of photolabile cell-laden methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) hydrogels. We bioprinted cell-laden GelMA at concentrations ranging from 7 to 15% with varying cell densities and found a direct correlation between printability and the hydrogel mechanical properties. Furthermore, encapsulated HepG2 cells preserved cell viability for at least eight days following the bioprinting process. In summary, this work presents a strategy for direct-write bioprinting of a cell-laden photolabile ECM-derived hydrogel, which may find widespread application for tissue engineering, organ printing and the development of 3D drug discovery platforms.

1 June 2016 in Trends in Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AVAjaykumar Vishwakarma
Ajaykumar Vishwakarma
NBNupura S. Bhise
Nupura S. Bhise
MEMarta B. Evangelista
Marta B. Evangelista
JRJeroen Rouwkema
Jeroen Rouwkema
MDMehmet R. Dokmeci
Mehmet R. Dokmeci
Ali  KhademhosseiniAli Khademhosseini
Ali Khademhosseini

24 May 2019 in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMilad Fathi-Achachelouei
Milad Fathi-Achachelouei
HKHelena Knopf-Marques
Helena Knopf-Marques
CSCristiane Evelise Ribeiro da Silva
Cristiane Evelise Ribeiro da Silva
JBJulien Barthès
Julien Barthès
EBErhan Bat
Erhan Bat
NVNihal Engin VRANA
Nihal Engin VRANA
Advances in nanoparticle (NP) production and demand for control over nanoscale systems have had significant impact on tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM). NPs with low toxicity, contrasting agent properties, tailorable characteristics, targeted/stimuli-response delivery potential, and precise control over behavior (via external stimuli such as magnetic fields) have made it possible their use for improving engineered tissues and overcoming obstacles in TERM. Functional tissue and organ replacements require a high degree of spatial and temporal control over the biological events and also their real-time monitoring. Presentation and local delivery of bioactive (growth factors, chemokines, inhibitors, cytokines, genes etc.) and contrast agents in a controlled manner are important implements to exert control over and monitor the engineered tissues. This need resulted in utilization of NP based systems in tissue engineering scaffolds for delivery of multiple growth factors, for providing contrast for imaging and also for controlling properties of the scaffolds. Depending on the application, materials, as polymers, metals, ceramics and their different composites can be utilized for production of NPs. In this review, we will cover the use of NP systems in TERM and also provide an outlook for future potential use of such systems.

1 August 2014 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAnwarul Hasan
Anwarul Hasan
APArghya Paul
Arghya Paul
NVNihal Engin VRANA
Nihal Engin VRANA
Xin ZhaoXin Zhao
Xin Zhao
Adnan MemicAdnan Memic
Adnan Memic
Ali  KhademhosseiniAli Khademhosseini
Ali Khademhosseini

29 June 2020 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGaëtan Lutzweiler
Gaëtan Lutzweiler
AHAlbana Ndreu Halili
Albana Ndreu Halili
NVNihal Engin VRANA
Nihal Engin VRANA
Porous scaffolds have been employed for decades in the biomedical field where researchers have been seeking to produce an environment which could approach one of the extracellular matrixes supporting cells in natural tissues. Such three-dimensional systems offer many degrees of freedom to modulate cell activity, ranging from the chemistry of the structure and the architectural properties such as the porosity, the pore, and interconnection size. All these features can be exploited synergistically to tailor the cell–material interactions, and further, the tissue growth within the voids of the scaffold. Herein, an overview of the materials employed to generate porous scaffolds as well as the various techniques that are used to process them is supplied. Furthermore, scaffold parameters which modulate cell behavior are identified under distinct aspects: the architecture of inert scaffolds (i.e., pore and interconnection size, porosity, mechanical properties, etc.) alone on cell functions followed by comparison with bioactive scaffolds to grasp the most relevant features driving tissue regeneration. Finally, in vivo outcomes are highlighted comparing the accordance between in vitro and in vivo results in order to tackle the future translational challenges in tissue repair and regeneration.

7 August 2017 in Advanced Healthcare Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BCByung‐Hyun Cha
Byung‐Hyun Cha
SSSu Ryon Shin
Su Ryon Shin
JLJeroen Leijten
Jeroen Leijten
YLYi‐Chen Li
Yi‐Chen Li
SSSonali Singh
Sonali Singh
Ali  KhademhosseiniAli Khademhosseini
Ali Khademhosseini