To investigate the clinical impact of coeliac artery (CA) coverage during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases were searched from 1989 to 2020 for studies reporting visceral ischaemia, spinal cord ischaemia (SCI), 30 day/in hospital mortality, endoleaks, re-intervention, and caudal stent graft migration following CA coverage in patients undergoing TEVAR. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects modelling. The quality of the evidence was graded using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Fifteen observational studies with 236 patients (108 male, age range 61.3 - 79 years) were included. The pooled visceral ischaemia rate was 13% with significant heterogeneity between studies (95% confidence intervals [CI] 4 - 24; I² = 72%, p < .001). The SCI rate was 5% (95% CI 2 - 9; I² = 0%); the 30 day/in hospital mortality was 4% (95% CI 1 - 7; I² = 0%); the overall endoleak rate was 21% (95% CI 13 - 29; I² = 35%) with a 5% (95% CI 0 - 13; I² = 38%) rate of type Ib and 2% (95% CI 0 - 8; I² = 43%) rate of type II endoleak from retrograde CA flow. The re-intervention rate was 13% (95% CI 6 - 22; I² = 54%); the caudal stent graft migration rate was 3% (95% CI 0 - 9, I² = 0%). The certainty of the body of evidence was judged to be very low for all outcomes. CA coverage during TEVAR is associated with high rates of visceral ischaemia, spinal cord ischaemia, 30 day/in hospital mortality, endoleaks, and re-intervention. Although the literature is of poor quality and questions remain over effects estimates, there is evidence that CA coverage should be avoided if at all possible, during TEVAR. PROSPERO registration number 244084.

To systematically identify all patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) [quality of life (QOL) instruments or other instrument/methodology] that have been used to date in aortic dissection (AD) and to explore how well these instruments evaluate QOL according to the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology/guideline. Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were search on 1st July 2022. This scoping review was undertaken according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the COSMIN guidelines for performing systematic reviews of validated PROMs. Studies that reported on any aspect/domain of QOL using a PROM or other instrument/methodology on AD were included. Data synthesis, including psychometric property analysis and risk-of-bias assessment according to COSMIN guidelines. Forty-five studies published between 1994 and 2021 reporting on 5 874 patients (mean age 63 years, 70.6% male) were included. A total of 39 PROMs were used, and three studies used semistructured interviews. The majority (69%) of studies were in patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD). The most common PROM used was the SF-36 (51%). Six studies evaluated one or more psychometric property of a PROM. Only one of these studies was specifically designed as a validation study. No study reported on content validity. Internal consistency was the most evaluated psychometric property. No study evaluated all the psychometric properties according to COSMIN methodology. The methodological quality used to assess these PROMs was judged to be adequate or very good. This review highlights the heterogeneity of PROMs/methods used to determine QOL in AD patients. The lack of research regarding a comprehensive evaluation of the psychometric properties of a PROM used in AD highlights the need for the development and validation of a dissection-specific PROM. [PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022310477].

To assess trends in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) hospital admissions, interventions, and aneurysm related mortality in England, and to examine the impact of endovascular repair on mortality for the years 1998 - 2020. Hospital admission and operative approach (endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, or open surgical repair [OSR]) using Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES), and aneurysm related mortality data from the Office for National Statistics for England standardised to the 2013 European Standard Population, were analysed using linear regression and Joinpoint regression analyses. Aneurysm related mortality was compared between the pre-endovascular era (1998 - 2010) and the endovascular era (2011 - 2019). A declining trend in hospital admission incidence was observed, mainly due to a decline in ruptured admissions from 34.6 per 100 000 (95% confidence interval [CI] 33.5 - 35.6) to 13.5 per 100 000 (95% CI 12.9 - 14.2; β_i = -1.04, r² = .97, p < .001). Operative interventions have been declining over the last 23 years mainly due to the statistically significant decline in open procedures (41.2 per 100 000 in 2000 [95% CI 40 - 42.3] to 9.6 per 100 000 [95% CI 9.1 - 10.1]; β_i = -1.92, r² = .95; p < .001). There was an increasing trend toward endovascular procedures (5.8 per 100 000 [95% CI 5.3 - 6.2] in 2006 to 16.9 per 100 000 [95% CI 16.2 - 17.5] in 2020; β_i = .82, r² = .30, p = .040). Reductions in aneurysm related mortality due to AAAs were observed for males and females, irrespective of age and rupture status. A significant decrease in hospital admissions for AAAs was observed over the last 23 years in England, paralleled by a shift toward endovascular repair and a decline in OSR. Declines in aneurysm related mortality were observed overall, and in the endovascular era irrespective of age, sex, and rupture status.

To assess trends in thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) hospital admissions, interventions, and aneurysm related mortality (ARM) in England, and examine the impact of endovascular repair on mortality for the years 1998 to 2020. Hospital admission and operative approach (thoracic endovascular aortic repair, [TEVAR] or open surgical repair) using Hospital Episodes Statistics, and ARM data from the Office for National Statistics for England standardised to the 2013 European Standard Population were analysed using linear regression and Joinpoint regression analyses. ARM was compared between the pre-endovascular era (1998 - 2008) and the endovascular era (2009 - 2019). A rising trend in hospital admission incidence has been observed, mainly due non-ruptured admissions (4.11 per 100 000 in 1998; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.71 - 4.50 to 12.61 per 100 000 in 2020; 95% CI 12.00 - 13.21 in 2020; r² = .98; p < .001). Operative interventions increased mainly due to an increase in TEVAR (2.15 per 100 000; 95% CI 1.91 - 2.41 in 2020 vs. 0.26 per 100 000; 95% CI 0.16 - 0.36 in 2006; r² = .90; p < .001). Reductions in ARM from TAA were observed for males and females, irrespective of age and rupture status. The greatest reduction in ARM in the endovascular era was observed in females aged > 80 years with ruptured disease (15.26 deaths per 100 000 vs. 9.50 deaths per 100 000; p < .001). A significant increase in hospital admissions for non-ruptured TAA has been observed in the last 23 years in England, paralleled by a shift towards endovascular repair, and significant declining trends in ARM, irrespective of sex and age. The significant reductions in age standardised death rates from ruptured and non-ruptured TAA in the endovascular era, particularly for females aged > 80 years with ruptured disease, affirm the positive impact of an endovascular approach to TAA.

Background: Social media platforms such as YouTube are integral tools for disseminating information about health and wellness to the public. However, anecdotal reports have cited that the human gut microbiome has been a particular focus of dubious, misleading, and, on occasion, harmful media content. Despite these claims, there have been no published studies investigating this phenomenon within popular social media platforms. Objective: The aim of this study is to (1) evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the content in YouTube videos related to the human gut microbiome and (2) investigate the correlation between content engagement metrics and video quality, as defined by validated criteria. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, videos about the human gut microbiome were searched for on the United Kingdom version of YouTube on September 20, 2021. The 600 most-viewed videos were extracted and screened for relevance. The contents and characteristics of the videos were extracted and independently rated using the DISCERN quality criteria by 2 researchers. Results: Overall, 319 videos accounting for 62,354,628 views were included. Of the 319 videos, 73.4% (n=234) were produced in North America and 78.7% (n=251) were uploaded between 2019 and 2021. A total of 41.1% (131/319) of videos were produced by nonprofit organizations. Of the videos, 16.3% (52/319) included an advertisement for a product or promoted a health-related intervention for financial purposes. Videos by nonmedical education creators had the highest total and preferred viewership. Daily viewership was the highest for videos by internet media sources. The average DISCERN and Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct scores were 49.5 (SE 0.68) out of 80 and 5.05 (SE 2.52) out of 8, respectively. DISCERN scores for videos by medical professionals (mean 53.2, SE 0.17) were significantly higher than for videos by independent content creators (mean 39.1, SE 5.58; P<.001). Videos including promotional materials had significantly lower DISCERN scores than videos without any advertisements or product promotion (P<.001). There was no correlation between DISCERN scores and total viewership, daily viewership, or preferred viewership (number of likes). Conclusions: The overall quality and reliability of information about the human gut microbiome on YouTube is generally poor. Moreover, there was no correlation between the quality of a video and the level of public engagement. The significant disconnect between reliable sources of information and the public suggests that there is an immediate need for cross-sector initiatives to safeguard vulnerable viewers from the potentially harmful effects of misinformation.