The effects of nitroglycerin (glyceryl trinitrate, GTN) on baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) are incompletely understood. Moreover, there are no reports evaluating the acute responses in both the sympathetic BRS (SBRS) and the cardiovagal BRS (CBRS) to the administration of sublingual GTN. We hypothesized that sublingual GTN modulates both CBRS and SBRS. In 10 healthy subjects, beat-to-beat heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were recorded before and for 10 min after sublingual administration of GTN 0.4 mg. SBRS was evaluated from the relationship between spontaneous variations in diastolic BP and MSNA. CBRS was assessed with the sequence technique. These variables were assessed during baseline, during 3rd–6th min ( post A), and 7th–10th min ( post B) after GTN administration. Two min after GTN administration, MSNA increased significantly and remained significantly elevated during recording. Compared with baseline, CBRS decreased significantly ( post A: 12.9 ± 1.6 to 7.1 ± 1.0 ms/mmHg, P < 0.05), whereas SBRS increased significantly ( post A: 0.8 ± 0.2 to 1.5 ± 0.2 units·beat⁻¹·mmHg⁻¹, P < 0.05) with an upward shift of the operating point. There were no differences in these variables between posts A and B. A clinical dose of GTN increased MSNA rapidly through effects on both CBRS and SBRS. These effects should be kept in mind when nitrates are used to clinically treat chest pain and acute coronary syndromes and used as vasodilators in experimental settings.

The arterial velocity pulse index (AVI) and arterial pressure‐volume index (API) have been proposed as new arterial stiffness indices that can be measured using an oscillometric cuff. Sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) contributes to arterial stiffness via increasing vascular smooth muscle tone. However, the associations between SNA and the AVI or API are not understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships between muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and the AVI or API in healthy individuals and patients with hypertension (HT). Forty healthy individuals (40.1 ± 15.2 years, 8 females) (healthy group) and 40 patients with HT (60.2 ± 13.6, 18 females) (HT group) were included in this study. The AVI, API, MSNA, beat‐by‐beat blood pressure, and heart rate were recorded simultaneously. The AVI and API were higher in the HT group than in the healthy group (AVI, 26.1 ± 7.6 vs. 16.5 ± 4.0, p < 0.001; API, 31.2 ± 8.6 vs. 25.5 ± 7.2, p = 0.002). MSNA in the HT group was also higher than in the healthy group (p < 0.001). MSNA was correlated with the AVI, but not with the API, in both the healthy group (R = 0.52, p = 0.001) and HT group (R = 0.57, p < 0.001). MSNA was independently correlated with the AVI in multivariate analysis (ß = 0.34, p = 0.001). In conclusion, AVI, obtained by a simple and less user‐dependent method, was related to the MSNA in healthy individuals and patients with HT.

Background: Cardiac tamponade is a rare but serious complication of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC). Two cases of cardiac tamponade subsequent to TC have been reported. The pericardial effusion in these cases was hemorrhagic and caused by ventricular rupture. Cardiac tamponade induced by an inflammatory effusion complicated with TC has not been reported. This is the first case report of TC, which developed cardiac tamponade during the recovery phase with a large volume non-hemorrhagic inflammatory effusion. Case presentation: We describe a case of an 81-year-old woman admitted to our hospital because of severe chest pain. Her symptoms began soon after her son’s hospitalization. We diagnosed her with TC based on results of an electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and emergent coronary angiography. Her symptoms and left ventricular dysfunction improved gradually. She developed newly confirmed chest pain and dyspnea on day 9 after admission. A large pericardial effusion developed, resulting in cardiac tamponade. Her symptoms and hemodynamic status improved immediately after the pericardiocentesis. The effusion was non-hemorrhagic and exudative. No specific signs of infection, collagen disease, or malignant tumors were observed, except for TC. Conclusions: We experienced a case of circulatory collapse induced by TC-related inflammatory pericardial effusion at recovery phase. This case emphasizes the importance of careful follow-up even after improved left ventricular dysfunction in a patient with TC.

Preclinical models indicate that amiloride (AMD), a nonselective antagonist of the acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs), impairs baroreflex sensitivity and perturbs blood pressure regulation. We translated these findings into humans, investigating the impact of acute oral ingestion of AMD on blood pressure variability and spontaneous cardiac and sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity in healthy young humans. In contrast to preclinical evidence, AMD does not impair spontaneous arterial baroreflex sensitivity and blood pressure variability in healthy young adults.

The venous distension reflex (VDR) is a pressor response evoked by peripheral venous distension and accompanied by increased muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). The effects of venous distension on the baroreflex, an important modulator of blood pressure (BP), have not been examined. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the VDR on baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). We hypothesized that the VDR will increase the sympathetic BRS (SBRS). Beat-by-beat heart rate (HR), BP, and MSNA were recorded in 16 female and 19 male young healthy subjects. To induce venous distension, normal saline equivalent to 5% of the forearm volume was infused into the veins of the occluded forearm. SBRS was assessed from the relationship between diastolic BP and MSNA during spontaneous BP variations. Cardiovagal BRS (CBRS) was assessed with the sequence technique. Venous distension evoked significant increases in BP and MSNA. Compared with baseline, during the maximal VDR response period, SBRS was significantly increased (−3.1 ± 1.5 to −4.5 ± 1.6 bursts·100 heartbeats⁻¹·mmHg⁻¹, P < 0.01) and CBRS was significantly decreased (16.6 ± 5.4 to 13.8 ± 6.1 ms·mmHg⁻¹, P < 0.01). No sex differences were observed in the effect of the VDR on SBRS or CBRS. These results indicate that in addition to its pressor effect, the VDR altered both SBRS and CBRS. We speculate that these changes in baroreflex function contribute to the modulation of MSNA and BP during limb venous distension.