Objectives: The angle of progression (AOP), measured by transperineal ultrasound, has been used to assess fetal head descent during labor. Our aim was to assess whether, before onset of labor, parous women have a narrower AOP than do nulliparous women and if a narrow AOP is associated with a higher rate of Cesarean delivery.Methods: In this prospective, observational study, we performed transperineal ultrasound in pregnant women not yet in labor at ≥ 39 weeks' gestation who delivered within 1 week of sonography. The AOP was compared as follows: in nulliparous women, between those who had a Cesarean section and those who delivered vaginally; and among women who delivered vaginally, between those who were nulliparous and those who were parous.Results: Included in the study were 100 nulliparous and 71 parous women. Among those who delivered vaginally (n = 161), the median AOP before onset of labor was narrower in parous than in nulliparous women (98° (interquartile range (IQR)), 90–107° vs 104° (IQR, 97–113°), P < 0.001). Among the 100 nulliparous women, (1) the median AOP before onset of labor was narrower in those who went on to deliver by Cesarean section (n = 9) than in those delivered vaginally (n = 91) (90° (IQR, 85.5–93.5°) vs 104° (IQR, 97–113°), P < 0.001); (2) an AOP ≥ 95° (derived from the receiver–operating characteristics curve) was associated with vaginal delivery in 99% of women; and (3) 89% (8/9) of women who delivered by Cesarean section had an AOP < 95°. Among the 71 parous women, only one delivered by Cesarean section and all of those with an AOP < 95° delivered vaginally.Conclusion: A narrow AOP (< 95°) in non‐laboring nulliparous women at term is associated with a high rate of Cesarean delivery. Parous women have a narrower AOP than do nulliparous women before the onset of labor; however, unlike in nulliparous women, a narrow AOP in parous women does not appear to be associated with Cesarean delivery and most parous women with such an angle go on to deliver vaginally. Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Normal biometry of the fetal posterior fossa rules out most major anomalies of the cerebellum and vermis. Our aim was to provide new reference data of the fetal vermis in 4 biometric parameters by using 3 imaging modalities, 2D ultrasound, 3D ultrasound, and MR imaging, and to assess the relation among these modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between June 2011 and June 2013. Three different imaging modalities were used to measure vermis biometry: 2D ultrasound, 3D ultrasound, and MR imaging. The vermian parameters evaluated were the maximum superoinferior diameter, maximum anteroposterior diameter, the perimeter, and the surface area. Statistical analysis was performed to calculate centiles for gestational age and to assess the agreement among the 3 imaging modalities. RESULTS: The number of fetuses in the study group was 193, 172, and 151 for 2D ultrasound, 3D ultrasound, and MR imaging, respectively. The mean and median gestational ages were 29.1 weeks, 29.5 weeks (range, 21–35 weeks); 28.2 weeks, 29.05 weeks (range, 21–35 weeks); and 32.1 weeks, 32.6 weeks (range, 27–35 weeks) for 2D ultrasound, 3D ultrasound, and MR imaging, respectively. In all 3 modalities, the biometric measurements of the vermis have shown a linear growth with gestational age. For all 4 biometric parameters, the lowest results were those measured by MR imaging, while the highest results were measured by 3D ultrasound. The inter- and intraobserver agreement was excellent for all measures and all imaging modalities. Limits of agreement were considered acceptable for clinical purposes for all parameters, with excellent or substantial agreement defined by the intraclass correlation coefficient. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging technique–specific reference data should be used for the assessment of the fetal vermis in pregnancy.

Twin pregnancies are at higher risk for fetal mortality when compared with singleton pregnancies. Single fetal demise occurs in 3.7–6.8% of all twin pregnancies and considerably increases the complication rate in the co-twin including fetal loss, premature delivery, and end-organ damage. In this review, we summarize the current information on the etiology of single twin demise, the pathophysiology of injury to the surviving twin, and the preventive and secondary management strategies.

Objectives Recent research provides evidence that anogenital distance may serve as a novel metric to assess reproductive potential in men. In children, a shorter anogenital distance was linked with cryptorchidism, hypospadias, and micropenis. Scarce data exist in the literature regarding anogenital distance measurement in the fetus. The aim of our study was to assess whether intrauterine measurement of fetal anogenital distance could assist in the differential diagnosis of male genital anomalies. Methods Anogenital distance was prospectively measured in all cases referred for suspected isolated abnormal male genitalia. Final diagnoses, confirmed by a pediatric urologist, were compared with anogenital distance prenatal measurements. Results Fifty‐two cases were referred for evaluation because of suspected male external genital malformation during a 12‐month period. Cases with normal‐appearing genitalia, associated major malformations, and early severe fetal growth restriction were excluded from the study. Postnatal examination revealed 14 cases of hypospadias in varying severity and 8 cases of a buried penis. All fetuses with hypospadias had an anogenital distance measurement below the fifth percentile. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the normal mean anogenital distance for gestational age versus those with hypospadias (mean ± SD, 16.90 ± 4.08 and 11.68 ± 3.31 mm, respectively; P = .001). No significant difference was found between the normal mean anogenital distance for gestational age versus those with a buried penis (18.85 ± 2.76 and 19.46 ± 3.41 mm; P = .700). Conclusions Fetuses with hypospadias have a statistically significant shorter anogenital distance compared with the general population. Therefore, anogenital distance may serve as a complementary objective sonographic parameter in the prenatal assessment and counseling of male external genital anomalies.