To evaluate dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameters in the prediction of the immediate therapeutic response of MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids Institutional review board approved this study, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. A total of 10 symptomatic uterine fibroids (diameter: mean, 8.9 cm; range, 4.7–12 cm) in 10 female patients (mean age, 42.2 years) were treated with MR-HIFU therapy using the volumetric ablation technique. DCE-MRI and conventional contrast-enhanced MRI were obtained as a baseline and as an immediate follow-up study, respectively. After regions of interest of each treatment cell were properly registered to both MRI studies, DCE-MRI parameters (Ktrans, ve, vp) and operator-controllable therapy parameters (power, treatment cell size, sonication depth) were investigated on a cell-by-cell basis to reflect tissue inhomogeneity. Two types of ablation efficacy indices (volume of 240 equivalent minutes at 43°C/treatment-cell volume, nonperfused volume/treatment-cell volume) were then correlated with those parameters using multiple linear regression analysis to determine which factors were significant predictors for ablation efficacy. We used 293 treatment cells (4 mm, n = 12; 8 mm, n = 115; 12 mm, n = 149; 16 mm, n = 17), and all of them were analyzable. Ablation efficacies were 1.06 ± 0.58 and 0.67 ± 0.39. Ktrans (B = −12.035, P Conclusions: A higher Ktrans value at baseline DCE-MRI suggested a poor ablation efficacy of MR-HIFU therapy for symptomatic uterine fibroids.

Paik ES, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Aug;30:e65. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e65

Paik ES, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Dec;29:e18. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e18

(1) Background: The aim of this study is to compare the IOTA-ADNEX (international ovarian tumor analysis–assessment of different neoplasias in the adnexa) model with gynecologic experts in differentiating ovarian diseases. (2) Methods: All participants in this prospective study underwent ultrasonography (US) equipped with the IOTA-ADNEX^TM model and subjective assessment by a sonographic expert. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were also generated to compare overall accuracies. The optimal cut-off value of the ADNEX model for excluding benign diseases was calculated. (3) Results: Fifty-nine participants were eligible: 54 and 5 underwent surgery and follow-up computed tomography (CT), respectively. Benign and malignant diseases were confirmed in 49 (83.1%) and 10 (16.9%) participants, respectively. The specificity of the ADNEX model was 0.816 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.680–0.912) in all participants and 0.795 (95% CI, 0.647–0.902) in the surgical group. The area under the ROC curve of the ADNEX model (0.924) was not significantly different from that of subjective assessment (0.953 in all participants, 0.951 in the surgical group; p = 0.391 in all participants, p = 0.407 in the surgical group). The optimal cut-off point using the ADNEX model was 47.3%, with a specificity of 0.977 (95% CI: 0.880–0.999). (4) Conclusions: The IOTA-ADNEX model is equal to gynecologic US experts in excluding benign ovarian tumors. Subsequently, being familiar with this US software may help gynecologic beginners to reduce unnecessary surgery.