Background: Breast cancer–related lymphedema affects one in five patients. Its risk is increased by axillary lymph node dissection and regional lymph node radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of immediate lymphatic reconstruction or the lymphatic microsurgical preventative healing approach on postoperative lymphedema incidence. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of all patients referred for immediate lymphatic reconstruction at the authors’ institution from September of 2016 through February of 2019. Patients with preoperative measurements and a minimum of 6 months’ follow-up data were identified. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, cancer treatment data, intraoperative management, and lymphedema incidence. Results: A total of 97 women with unilateral node-positive breast cancer underwent axillary nodal surgery and attempt at immediate lymphatic reconstruction over the study period. Thirty-two patients underwent successful immediate lymphatic reconstruction with a mean patient age of 54 years and body mass index of 28 ± 6 kg/m². The median number of lymph nodes removed was 14 and the median follow-up time was 11.4 months (range, 6.2 to 26.9 months). Eighty-eight percent of patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy of which 93 percent received regional lymph node radiotherapy. Mean L-Dex change was 2.9 units and mean change in volumetry by circumferential measurements and perometry was −1.7 percent and 1.3 percent, respectively. At the end of the study period, we found an overall 3.1 percent rate of lymphedema. Conclusion: Using multiple measurement modalities and strict follow-up guidelines, the authors’ findings support that immediate lymphatic reconstruction at the time of axillary surgery is a promising, safe approach for lymphedema prevention in a high-risk patient population. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize the current state of surgical ergonomics education in the United States. Background: The burden of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in surgeons is high and no overarching strategy for redress exists. Twelve distinct specialties describe an unmet need for surgical ergonomics education (SEE). This study aimed to define the current state of SEE in U.S. surgical training programs. Methods: We performed a descriptive analysis of a 20-item questionnaire of ACGME-certified program directors from 14 surgical and interventional medical specialties. Formal SEE was defined as any organized education module that reviewed the occupation-specific burden of common work-related MSDs and described a framework for prevention via occupation-specific applied ergonomics. Program directors were queried regarding SEE provision, characteristics, and perceived trainee attitude toward the education. Results: Questionnaires were received from 130 of 441 (29.5%) program directors. Two (1.5%) provided formal SEE and 33 (25.4%) provided informal SEE, which consisted of unstructured intraoperative directives and isolated lectures. Two programs previously provided SEE but discontinued the effort due to lack of an evidence-based framework and instructors. Trainees appeared to think that learning surgical ergonomics skills was a worthwhile time investment in 100% and 76.7% of current formal and informal SEE, respectively. Conclusion: SEE is rarely provided in any capacity (25.4%), let alone in a consistent or evaluable fashion (1.5%). Impediments to sustainable SEE include lack of an evidence-based framework for education and instructors. An evidence-based, reproducible, and accreditation council-compliant SEE module would be a valuable resource for the surgical and interventional medical communities.

Background: Up to one in three patients may go on to develop breast cancer–related lymphedema (BCRL) after treatment. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) has been shown in early studies to reduce the risk of BCRL, but long-term outcomes are limited because of its recent introduction and institutions’ differing eligibility requirements. This study evaluated the incidence of BCRL in a cohort that underwent ILR over the long term. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients referred for ILR at the authors’ institution from September of 2016 through September of 2020 was performed. Patients with preoperative measurements, a minimum of 6 months of follow-up data, and at least one completed lymphovenous bypass were identified. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, cancer treatment data, intraoperative management, and lymphedema incidence. Results: A total of 186 patients with unilateral node-positive breast cancer underwent axillary nodal surgery and an attempt at ILR over the study period. Ninety patients underwent successful ILR and met all eligibility criteria, with a mean patient age of 54 ± 12.1 years and median body mass index of 26.6 kg/m² [interquartile range (IQR), 24.0 to 30.7 kg/m²]. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 14 (IQR, eight to 19). Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 6 to 49 months). Eighty-seven percent of patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy, and among them, 97% received regional lymph node irradiation. The overall rate of lymphedema was 9% at the end of the study period. Conclusions: With the use of strict follow-up guidelines over the long term, the authors’ findings support that ILR at the time of axillary lymph node dissection is an effective procedure that reduces the risk of BCRL in a high-risk patient population. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

The Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (LYMPHA) procedure entails performing a lymphovenous bypass (LVB) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection to reduce lymphedema risk. The two most common fluorophores utilized in LVB are blue dye and indocyanine green. We developed a novel application of fluorescein isothiocyanate for intraoperative lymphatic mapping. Our goal is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of fluorescein isothiocyanate for this application. We reviewed a prospectively collected database on breast cancer patients who underwent LYMPHA from March to September 2015. Fluorescein isothiocyanate was used to identify arm lymphatic channels after axillary lymph node dissection to perform an LVB between disrupted lymphatics and axillary vein tributaries. Data on preoperative and intraoperative variables were analyzed. Thirteen patients underwent LYMPHA with intraoperative fluorescein isothiocyanate lymphatic mapping from March to September 2015. Average patient age was 50 years with a mean body mass index of 28. On average, 3.4 lacerated lymphatic channels were identified at an average distance of 2.72 cm (range, 0.25–5 cm) caudal to the axillary vein. On average, 1.7 channels were bypassed per patient. Eleven anastomoses were performed to the accessory branch of the axillary vein and 1 to a lateral branch. In 1 patient, a bypass was not performed due to poor lymphatic caliber and inadequate length of the harvested vein tributary. No intraoperative adverse events were noted. Fluorescein isothiocyanate is a safe and effective method for intra-operative lymphatic mapping. Fluorescein isothiocyanate imaging allows for simultaneous dissection and lymphatic visualization, making it an ideal agent for lymphatic mapping and dissection in open surgical fields, such as in the LYMPHA procedure.