Rationale: Given the paucity of effective treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), new insights into the deleterious mechanisms controlling lung fibroblast activation, the key cell type driving the fibrogenic process, are essential to develop new therapeutic strategies. TGF-β (transforming growth factor-β) is the main profibrotic factor, but its inhibition is associated with severe side effects because of its pleiotropic role. Objectives: To determine if downstream noncoding effectors of TGF-β in fibroblasts may represent new effective therapeutic targets whose modulation may be well tolerated. Methods: We investigated the whole noncoding fraction of TGF-β–stimulated lung fibroblast transcriptome to identify new genomic determinants of lung fibroblast differentiation into myofibroblasts. Differential expression of the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) DNM3OS (dynamin 3 opposite strand) and its associated microRNAs (miRNAs) was validated in a murine model of pulmonary fibrosis and in IPF tissue samples. Distinct and complementary antisense oligonucleotide–based strategies aiming at interfering with DNM3OS were used to elucidate the role of DNM3OS and its associated miRNAs in IPF pathogenesis. Measurements and Main Results: We identified DNM3OS as a fibroblast-specific critical downstream effector of TGF-β–induced lung myofibroblast activation. Mechanistically, DNM3OS regulates this process in trans by giving rise to three distinct profibrotic mature miRNAs (i.e., miR-199a-5p/3p and miR-214-3p), which influence SMAD and non-SMAD components of TGF-β signaling in a multifaceted way. In vivo, we showed that interfering with DNM3OS function not only prevents lung fibrosis but also improves established pulmonary fibrosis. Conclusions: Pharmacological approaches aiming at interfering with the lncRNA DNM3OS may represent new effective therapeutic strategies in IPF.

Amongst the various methods that can be developed for noninvasive monitoring of gene expression in vivo, the use of positron emission tomography (PET) appears to be the most promising both for preclinical and clinical studies. Various genes have been described as potential PET reporters, but there is a need to develop new approaches that exploit transgenes with both therapeutic and imaging potential. The Na/I symporter (NIS) gene is expressed mainly in the thyroid and is responsible for iodide accumulation in this organ. The NIS gene has been used in gene therapy experimentation. Ectopic expression of this gene in various type of malignant cells has led to radiosensitization and in some cases tumor regression in xenograft models in nude mice, highlighting the therapeutic potential of this approach. In the present study, we demonstrate the potential of the human NIS gene (hNIS) as a reporter gene. Expression of hNIS, after plasmid transfection or adenoviral gene delivery, can be monitored in vitro on incubation with (125)I. Iodide uptake in the transduced cells can be directly correlated with the levels of gene expression in vitro. Ectopic expression of the NIS gene in vivo can be monitored in biodistribution studies on intravenous injection of (125)I. Adenovirus delivery induces gene expression essentially in the liver, adrenal glands, lungs, pancreas, and spleen. Expression of hNIS in tumor xenograft models can also be detected when the virus is injected intratumorally. Finally, hNIS expression was monitored by PET after intravenous injection of (124)I, demonstrating the potential of this approach for noninvasive imaging.

The sodium iodide symporter (NIS) is responsible for thyroidal, salivary, gastric, intestinal and mammary iodide uptake. It was first cloned from the rat in 1996 and shortly thereafter from human and mouse tissue. In the intervening years, we have learned a great deal about the biology of NIS. Detailed knowledge of its genomic structure, transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation and pharmacological modulation has underpinned the selection of NIS as an exciting approach for targeted gene delivery. A number of in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated the potential of using NIS gene therapy as a means of delivering highly conformal radiation doses selectively to tumours. This strategy is particularly attractive because it can be used with both diagnostic (99mTc, 125I, 124I) and therapeutic (131I, 186Re, 188Re, 211At) radioisotopes and it lends itself to incorporation with standard treatment modalities, such as radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. In this article, we review the biology of NIS and discuss its development for gene therapy.

Cell permeabilization using microbubbles (MB) and low‐intensity ultrasound (US) have the potential for delivering molecules into the cytoplasm. The collapsing MB and cavitation bubbles created by this collapse generate impulsive pressures that cause transient membrane permeability, allowing exogenous molecules to enter the cells. To evaluate this methodology in vitro and in vivo, we investigated the effects of low‐intensity 1‐MHz pulsed US and MB combined with cis‐diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (CDDP) on two cell lines (Colon 26 murine colon carcinoma and EMT6 murine mammary carcinoma) in vitro and in vivo on severe combined immunodeficient mice inoculated with HT29‐luc human colon carcinoma. To investigate in vitro the efficiency of molecular delivery by the US and MB method, calcein molecules with a molecular weight in the same range as that of CDDP were used as fluorescent markers. Fluorescence measurement revealed that approximately 10⁶–10⁷ calcein molecules per cell were internalized. US–MB‐mediated delivery of CDDP in Colon 26 and EMT6 cells increased cytotoxicity in a dose‐dependent manner and induced apoptosis (nuclear condensation and fragmentation, and increase in caspase‐3 activity). In vivo experiments with xenografts (HT29‐luc) revealed a very significant reduction in tumor volume in mice treated with CDDP + US + MB compared with those in the US + CDDP groups for two different concentrations of CDDP. This finding suggests that the US–MB method combined with chemotherapy has clinical potential in cancer therapy. (Cancer Sci 2008; 99: 2525–2531)