Dan Parker

Prof. Dan Parker

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 March 2018 in Molecular Biology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MWMichael Westbury
Michael Westbury
SHStefanie Hartmann
Stefanie Hartmann
ABAxel Barlow
Axel Barlow
IWIngrid Wiesel
Ingrid Wiesel
VLViyanna Leo
Viyanna Leo
MHMichael Hofreiter
Michael Hofreiter
Hyenas (family Hyaenidae), as the sister group to cats (family Felidae), represent a deeply diverging branch within the cat-like carnivores (Feliformia). With an estimated population size of <10,000 individuals worldwide, the brown hyena (Parahyaena brunnea) represents the rarest of the four extant hyena species and has been listed as Near Threatened by the IUCN. Here, we report a high-coverage genome from a captive bred brown hyena and both mitochondrial and low-coverage nuclear genomes of 14 wild-caught brown hyena individuals from across southern Africa. We find that brown hyena harbor extremely low genetic diversity on both the mitochondrial and nuclear level, most likely resulting from a continuous and ongoing decline in effective population size that started ∼1 Ma and dramatically accelerated towards the end of the Pleistocene. Despite the strikingly low genetic diversity, we find no evidence of inbreeding within the captive bred individual and reveal phylogeographic structure, suggesting the existence of several potential subpopulations within the species.

1 October 2013 in South African Journal of Wildlife Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SMS.M. Miller
S.M. Miller
CBC. Bissett
C. Bissett
ABA. Burger
A. Burger
BCB. Courtenay
B. Courtenay
TDT. Dickerson
T. Dickerson
DZD. Zimmermann
D. Zimmermann
African Journal of Wildlife Research

9 May 2019 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHM. P. G. Hofman
M. P. G. Hofman
MHM. W. Hayward
M. W. Hayward
MHM. Heim
M. Heim
PMP. Marchand
P. Marchand
CRC. M. Rolandsen
C. M. Rolandsen
NBN. Balkenhol
N. Balkenhol
Satellite telemetry is an increasingly utilized technology in wildlife research, and current devices can track individual animal movements at unprecedented spatial and temporal resolutions. However, as we enter the golden age of satellite telemetry, we need an in-depth understanding of the main technological, species-specific and environmental factors that determine the success and failure of satellite tracking devices across species and habitats. Here, we assess the relative influence of such factors on the ability of satellite telemetry units to provide the expected amount and quality of data by analyzing data from over 3,000 devices deployed on 62 terrestrial species in 167 projects worldwide. We evaluate the success rate in obtaining GPS fixes as well as in transferring these fixes to the user and we evaluate failure rates. Average fix success and data transfer rates were high and were generally better predicted by species and unit characteristics, while environmental characteristics influenced the variability of performance. However, 48% of the unit deployments ended prematurely, half of them due to technical failure. Nonetheless, this study shows that the performance of satellite telemetry applications has shown improvements over time, and based on our findings, we provide further recommendations for both users and manufacturers.

1 September 2017 in Food Webs
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BABenjamin Allen
Benjamin Allen
LALee R. Allen
Lee R. Allen
HAHenrik Andrén
Henrik Andrén
GBGuy Ballard
Guy Ballard
LBLuigi Boitani
Luigi Boitani
DPDan Parker
Dan Parker

1 April 2011 in Oryx
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLP. Lindsey
P. Lindsey
CTC.J. Tambling
C.J. Tambling
RBR. Brummer
R. Brummer
HDH. Davies-Mostert
H. Davies-Mostert
MHMatt Hayward
Matt Hayward
DPDan Parker
Dan Parker
In South Africa there are efforts to manage reintroduced subpopulations of the Vulnerable cheetahAcinonyx jubatusin small reserves (10–1,000 km2) as a managed metapopulation. We estimated areas required to support cheetahs given varying prey densities, prey profiles and presence/absence of competing predators. A recent population and habitat viability assessment indicated that 20 subpopulations of 10 cheetahs or 10 subpopulations of 15 cheetahs are required to retain 90% of the heterozygosity of free-ranging cheetahs and to overcome stochastic events in the absence or presence of lionsPanthera leo, respectively. We estimate that 203 ± SE 42 km2(range 48–466 km2) is required to support 10 cheetahs in the absence of lions, whereas 703 ± SE 311 km2(166–2,806 km2) is required to support 15 cheetahs given equal numbers of lions, and 2,424 ± SE 890 km2(727–3,739 km2) given equal numbers of leopardsPanthera pardus, spotted hyaenasCrocuta crocuta, wild dogsLycaon pictusand lions. Existing subpopulations of cheetahs generally occur at densities higher than our mean predicted densities but usually within the range of predicted densities. The large area requirements of cheetahs have implications for the development of the managed metapopulation. Sourcing reintroduction sites of the sizes required to support recommended subpopulation sizes will be difficult. Consequently, innovative measures to increase the carrying capacity of reserves for cheetahs and/or to enlarge reserves will be required. Managers may be forced to stock cheetahs close to or beyond the carrying capacity of their reserves. Consequently, careful management of reintroduced subpopulations will be required to prevent declines in prey populations.

1 November 2015 in Biological Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TKTimothy R. Kuiper
Timothy R. Kuiper
ALAndrew J. Loveridge
Andrew J. Loveridge
DPDan Parker
Dan Parker
PJPaul J. Johnson
Paul J. Johnson
JHJane E. Hunt
Jane E. Hunt
DMDavid W. Macdonald
David W. Macdonald