STUDY QUESTION: What is the relationship between pre-pregnancy maternal glucose levels and fecundability in Chinese couples? SUMMARY ANSWER: Elevated pre-pregnancy maternal glucose levels were associated with fecundability, as reflected by prolonged time to pregnancy (TTP) among the couples with no prior gravidity. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Based on the National Free Pre-conception Check-up Projects supported by the Chinese government, 2 226 048 eligible couples attempting first pregnancy and participating in the project from 2015 to 2016 were included. They were followed-up for 1 year or until they reported pregnancy. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS: The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative pregnancy rate in each menstrual cycle, and the discrete-time analogue of the Cox models was used to estimate the fecundability odds ratios (FORs) and 95% CIs by different pre-pregnancy maternal glucose levels (impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or diabetes as compared to normal). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The cumulative pregnancy rate for 12 cycles of the normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level group was 42.29%, significantly higher than that of the IFG (35.52%) and diabetes groups (31.52%). After adjusting for confounding factors, the FORs were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.81–0.83) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.72–0.76) for the IFG and diabetes groups, respectively, as compared to the normal group. The association between pre-pregnancy maternal FPG levels and the FORs was non-linear, and the optimal FPG level for greatest fecundability (shortest TTP) was 3.90–4.89 mmol/L. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The findings from this register-based cohort study require cautious interpretation given that information bias would be inevitable for single FPG measurements and for TTP calculations that were based on telephone follow-up information. Additionally, because couples who achieved pregnancy during their first menstrual cycle in the study were excluded, the pregnancy rates reported were low and possibly biased. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The current report suggests that elevated pre-pregnancy maternal glucose levels were associated with prolonged TTP. Early evaluation and preventive treatment for female partners with IFG or diabetes in a pre-pregnancy examination are necessary. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Funding was provided by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grants No. 2016YFC1000300 and 2016YFC1000307), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 81872634), the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (grant No. 2018-I2M-1-004), the National Human Genetic Resources Sharing Service Platform (grant No. 2005DKA21300) and the National Population and Reproductive Health Science Data Center (grant No. 2005DKA32408), People’s Republic of China. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A

Background: Although sexually transmitted infections are regarded as the main cause of tubal infertility, the association between the common vaginal microbiome and female fecundability has yet to be determined. The objective of this study was to find convincing evidence relating to the impact of the vaginal bacterial structure on the fecundability of women planning pregnancy. Methods: We recruited women who took part in the Free Pre-pregnancy Health Examination Project from 13 June 2018 to 31 October 2018 (n = 89, phase I) and from 1 November 2018 to 30 May 2020 (n = 389, phase II). We collected pre-pregnancy vaginal swabs from each subject; then, we followed up each subject to acquire the pregnancy-planning outcome in 1 year. In phase I, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed to investigate the vaginal bacterial content between the pregnancy and non-pregnancy groups. These findings were verified in phase II by applying a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for the measurement of the absolute abundance of specific species. Cox models were used to estimate fecundability ratios (FR) for each vaginal microbiome type. Results: In phase I, 59.6% (53/89) of women became pregnant within 1 year. The principal coordinate analysis showed that the pre-pregnancy vaginal microbial community structures of the pregnant and non-pregnant groups were significantly different (PERMANOVA test, R² = 0.025, P = 0.049). The abundance of the genus Lactobacillus in the pregnancy group was higher than that of the non-pregnant group (linear discriminant analysis effect size (LDA) > 4.0). The abundance of the genus Gardnerella in the non-pregnant group was higher than those in the pregnant group (LDA > 4.0). In phase II, female fecundability increased with higher absolute loads of Lactobacillus gasseri (quartile Q4 vs Q1, FR = 1.71, 95%CI 1.02–2.87) but decreased with higher absolute loads of Fannyhessea vaginae (Q4 vs Q1, FR = 0.62, 95%CI 0.38–1.00). Clustering analysis showed that the vaginal microbiome of type D (characterized by a higher abundance of Lactobacillus iners, a lower abundance of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus gassri) was associated with a 55% reduction of fecundability (FR = 0.45, 95%CI 0.26–0.76) compared with type A (featuring three Lactobacillus species, low Gardnerella vaginalis and Fannyhessea vaginae abundance). Conclusions: This cohort study demonstrated an association between the pre-pregnancy vaginal microbiome and female fecundability. A vaginal microbiome characterized by a higher abundance of L. iners and lower abundances of L. crispatus and L. gasseri appeared to be associated with a lower fecundability. Further research now needs to confirm whether manipulation of the vaginal microenvironment might improve human fecundability.

Infertility, which is defined by the World Health Organization as the failure to conceive within 12 months of regular unprotected sexual intercourse, has drawn global concern.^1,2 With the increasing economic, mental, and social pressures, the prevalence of infertility has reached an average incidence of 12.5% globally and is still increasing.³ In practice, time to pregnancy (TTP) is an effective and widely used indicator that can be used to evaluate fecundability.⁴ Prolonged TTP generally indicates subfertility or low fecundability.⁵ Meanwhile, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major global public health threat, infecting approximately 296 million people worldwide in 2019.⁶ China has the largest population living with HBV, contributing to one-third of the world’s total.⁷ Research^8,9 has found that HBV not only invades human the liver, but also can be detected in semen and follicles of infected persons. Population studies^10,11 have found that HBV infection is associated with increased risk of female tubal infertility and is related to longer durations of infertility and lower rates of implantation among patients undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment.¹² Nevertheless, the association of HBV infection with human fecundability has not been conclusively established.^9,10,12-15

Anaemia is a global public health problem affecting women worldwide, and reproductive-age women are at increased risk. We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study analysing the prevalence of overall anaemia and anaemia according to severity in Chinese pre-pregnant women to update current knowledge on anaemia epidemiology. Based on the National Free Preconception Check-up Projects supported by the Chinese government, 5 679 782 women participating in this project in 2017 were included in the present study. The cyanmethemoglobin method was applied to assess Hb concentrations. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were applied for associated factors. The prevalence of anaemia among Chinese pre-pregnant women was 21·64 % (mild: 14·10 %, moderate: 7·17 % and severe : 0·37 %). The prevalence of overall and severe anaemia was the highest in Tibet and the lowest in Beijing among thirty-one provinces. Women’s age, region, ethnic origin, educational level, occupation and pregnancy history were all correlated with anaemia. Women with B blood type (adjusted OR (aOR) = 0·89), higher BMI (overweight: aOR = 0·84; obesity: aOR = 0·70) and alcohol consumption (aOR = 0·69) were less likely to have anaemia, while those with rhesus negative blood type (aOR = 1·10), history of anaemia (aOR = 2·60), older age at menarche (aOR = 1·19), heavy menstrual blood loss (aOR = 1·39), longer menstrual period (aOR = 1·09) and shorter menstrual cycle (aOR = 1·08) were more likely to suffer from anaemia. Meat or egg eaters were not significantly associated with severe anaemia. Anaemia is of moderate public health significance among Chinese pre-pregnant women. Interventions should be considered to prevent anaemia to the greatest extent possible to avoid potential harm in this population.

STUDY QUESTION: Do couple’s age ranges for optimal fecundability, and the associations with fecundability of couple’s age combinations and age differences differ with gravidity? SUMMARY ANSWER: The couple’s age range of optimal fecundability and age combinations differed with gravidity, and gravidity might modify the associations of age and spousal age difference with couple’s fecundability. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Age is one of the strongest determinants of fecundability, but the existing studies have certain limitations in study population, couple’s extreme age combinations and age differences, and have not explored whether the association between age and fecundability differs with gravidity. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Retrospective cohort study. 5 407 499 general reproductive-aged couples (not diagnosed with infertility) participated in the National Free Pre-conception Check-up Projects during 2015–2017. They were followed up for pregnancy outcomes through telephone interviews every 3 months until they became pregnant or were followed up for 1 year. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The main outcome was time to pregnancy, and the fecundability odds ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using the Cox models for discrete survival time. The associations of age and spousal age difference with fecundability were evaluated by restricted cubic splines. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In this large cohort of general reproductive-aged population, the age of optimal fecundability of multigravida couples was older than that of nulligravida couples, but their subsequent fecundability declined more sharply with age. The decline in female fecundability was more pronounced with age, with fecundability dropping by ∼30% in both nulligravida and multigravida couples whose female partners aged ≥35 years. In the nulligravida group, the fecundability of couples who were both ≤24 years with the same age was the highest, which decreased steadily with the increase of spousal age difference, and younger male partners did not seem to contribute to improving couple’s fecundability. In the multigravida group, couples with female partners aged 25–34 years and a spousal age difference of −5 to 5 years showed higher fecundability, and the effect of spousal age difference on couple’s fecundability became suddenly apparent when female partners aged around 40 years. Young male partners were unable to change the decisive effect of female partner’s age over 40 years on couple’s reduced fecundability, regardless of gravidity. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Lacking the time for couples to attempt pregnancy before enrollment, and some couples might suspend pregnancy plans during follow-up because of certain emergencies, which would misestimate the fecundability. Due to the lack of information on sperm quality and sexual frequency of couples, we could not adjust for these factors. Moreover, due to population characteristics, the extrapolation of our results required caution. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The couple’s age range of optimal fecundability, age combinations, and spousal age difference on fecundability varied with gravidity. Female age-related decline in fecundability was more dominant in couple’s fecundability. Targeted fertility guidance should be provided to couples with different age combinations and gravidities. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research received funding from the Project of National Research Institute for Family Planning (Grant No. 2018NRIFPJ03), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC1000307), and the National Human Genetic Resources Sharing Service Platform (Grant No. 2005DKA21300), People’s Republic of China. The funders had no role in study design, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors report no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.