Background: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease of the skin and mucous membranes. This disease typically affects the elderly and presents with itch and localized or, most frequently, generalized bullous lesions. A subset of patients only develops excoriations, prurigo‐like lesions, and eczematous and/or urticarial erythematous lesions. The disease, which is significantly associated with neurological disorders, has high morbidity and severely impacts the quality of life.Objectives and methodology: The Autoimmune blistering diseases Task Force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology sought to update the guidelines for the management of BP based on new clinical information, and new evidence on diagnostic tools and interventions. The recommendations are either evidence‐based or rely on expert opinion. The degree of consent among all task force members was included.Results: Treatment depends on the severity of BP and patients' comorbidities. High‐potency topical corticosteroids are recommended as the mainstay of treatment whenever possible. Oral prednisone at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day is a recommended alternative. In case of contraindications or resistance to corticosteroids, immunosuppressive therapies, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolate acid, may be recommended. The use of doxycycline and dapsone is controversial. They may be recommended, in particular, in patients with contraindications to oral corticosteroids. B‐cell‐depleting therapy and intravenous immunoglobulins may be considered in treatment‐resistant cases. Omalizumab and dupilumab have recently shown promising results. The final version of the guideline was consented to by several patient organizations.Conclusions: The guidelines for the management of BP were updated. They summarize evidence‐ and expert‐based recommendations useful in clinical practice.

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common type of subepidermal autoimmune bullous diseases. BP characteristically affects the elderly and is seen mainly in patients older than 70 years. While the annual incidence of BP has been estimated to be between 2.4 and 23 cases per million in the general population, it rises exponentially to 190–312 cases per million in individuals older than 80 years. In addition, a growing body of evidence reports a remarkable trend of increased incidence of BP, showing a 1.9- to 4.3-fold rise over the past two decades. This demonstrable increase warrants a higher awareness of the increased risk to develop BP. This review summarizes the current understanding of the epidemiological features of BP and sheds light on the putative explanations for its growing incidence.

Importance The association of bullous pemphigoid (BP) with the use of dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors among patients with diabetes has recently emerged. The risk of developing BP during treatment with new DPP-4 inhibitor agents like linagliptin is yet to be established. The clinical features and the prognostic outcomes of patients with DPP-4 inhibitor–associated BP are yet to be established. Objectives Primarily to estimate the association between DPP-4 inhibitor exposure and the development of BP, and secondarily to characterize the clinical features and history of patients with DPP-4 inhibitor–associated BP. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective case-control study of the intake of different DPP-4 inhibitor agents and metformin and occurrence of BP among patients with diabetes in a tertiary care referral center for autoimmune bullous diseases in northern Israel. Included were 82 consecutive patients with diabetes and immunopathologically validated BP diagnosed between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017, and 328 age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched control participants with diabetes but without BP. Main Outcomes and Measures Patients with diabetes and BP and exposure to DPP-4 inhibitors were followed up for a median of 2.0 years and compared with other patients with diabetes and BP who were not exposed to DPP-4 inhibitors regarding clinical and immunological features, laboratory analyses, treatments, and clinical outcomes. Results Eighty-two patients with BP and 328 age- and sex-matched control participants were enrolled; mean (SD) age, 79.1 (9.1) years; and 44 patients were female (53.7%). Overall, DPP-4 inhibitor intake was associated with a 3-fold increased risk for BP (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.2; 95% CI, 1.9-5.4). The adjusted ORs for vildagliptin and linagliptin were 10.7 (95% CI, 5.1-22.4) and 6.7 (95% CI, 2.2-19.7), respectively. The association of DPP-4 inhibitor use with BP was independent of the use of metformin and was stronger among male (OR, 4.46; 95% CI, 2.11-9.40) than female (OR, 1.88; 95%, CI 0.92-3.86) patients and strongest in patients younger than 70 years (OR, 5.59; 95% CI, 1.73-18.01). Patients with DPP-4 inhibitor–associated BP presented with higher mucosal involvement (22.2% vs 6.5%;P = .04) and lower mean (SD) peripheral eosinophil counts (399.8 [508.0] vs 1117.6 [1847.6] cells/μL;P = .01) than those with BP who had not been exposed to DPP-4 inhibitor. Discontinuation of DPP-4 inhibitor treatment was followed by improved clinical outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance Vildagliptin and, to a lesser extent, linagliptin are associated with an increased risk of BP. This may partly explain the increasing incidence of BP in Israel. Discontinuation of DPP-4 inhibitor treatment in patients with diabetes should be considered when BP is diagnosed.

Pemphigus is an epidemiologically heterogeneous group of autoimmune bullous diseases comprising pemphigus vulgaris (PV), pemphigus foliaceus, paraneoplastic pemphigus, IgA pemphigus, and pemphigus herpetiformis. Recently, our knowledge about the frequency of pemphigus, which is highly variable between different populations, has considerably expanded, and the first non-HLA genes associated with PV have been identified. In addition, a variety of comorbidities, including other autoimmune diseases, hematological malignancies, and psoriasis, have been described in this variant. Here, initial data about the impact of COVID-19 on this fragile patient population are discussed and perspectives for future epidemiological studies are outlined.