Steven Furnell

Prof. Dr. Steven Furnell

School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2015 in Computers & Security
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSNader Sohrabi Safa
Nader Sohrabi Safa
Mehdi SookhakMehdi Sookhak
Mehdi Sookhak
RSRossouw Von Solms
Rossouw Von Solms
Steven FurnellSteven Furnell
Steven Furnell
NGNorjihan Abdul Ghani
Norjihan Abdul Ghani
Tutut HerawanTutut Herawan
Tutut Herawan

1 February 2016 in Computers & Security
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSNader Sohrabi Safa
Nader Sohrabi Safa
RSRossouw Von Solms
Rossouw Von Solms
Steven FurnellSteven Furnell
Steven Furnell

31 December 2014 in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Weizhi MengWeizhi Meng
Weizhi Meng
DWDuncan S. Wong
Duncan S. Wong
Steven FurnellSteven Furnell
Steven Furnell
JZJianying Zhou
Jianying Zhou
Designing reliable user authentication on mobile phones is becoming an increasingly important task to protect users' private information and data. Since biometric approaches can provide many advantages over the traditional authentication methods, they have become a significant topic for both academia and industry. The major goal of biometric user authentication is to authenticate legitimate users and identify impostors based on physiological and behavioral characteristics. In this paper, we survey the development of existing biometric authentication techniques on mobile phones, particularly on touch-enabled devices, with reference to 11 biometric approaches (five physiological and six behavioral). We present a taxonomy of existing efforts regarding biometric authentication on mobile phones and analyze their feasibility of deployment on touch-enabled mobile phones. In addition, we systematically characterize a generic biometric authentication system with eight potential attack points and survey practical attacks and potential countermeasures on mobile phones. Moreover, we propose a framework for establishing a reliable authentication mechanism through implementing a multimodal biometric user authentication in an appropriate way. Experimental results are presented to validate this framework using touch dynamics, and the results show that multimodal biometrics can be deployed on touch-enabled phones to significantly reduce the false rates of a single biometric system. Finally, we identify challenges and open problems in this area and suggest that touch dynamics will become a mainstream aspect in designing future user authentication on mobile phones.

1 August 2006 in International Journal of Information Security
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NCN. L. Clarke
N. L. Clarke
Steven FurnellSteven Furnell
Steven Furnell

1 March 2017 in Computers & Security
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AFAli Feizollah
Ali Feizollah
NANor Badrul Anuar
Nor Badrul Anuar
RSRosli Salleh
Rosli Salleh
Guillermo Suárez-TangilGuillermo Suárez-Tangil
Guillermo Suárez-Tangil
Steven FurnellSteven Furnell
Steven Furnell
The wide popularity of Android systems has been accompanied by increase in the number of malware targeting these systems. This is largely due to the open nature of the Android framework that facilitates the incorporation of third-party applications running on top of any Android device. Inter-process communication is one of the most notable features of the Android framework as it allows the reuse of components across process boundaries. This mechanism is used as gateway to access different sensitive services in the Android framework. In the Android platform, this communication system is usually driven by a late runtime binding messaging object known as Intent. In this paper, we evaluate the effectiveness of Android Intents (explicit and implicit) as a distinguishing feature for identifying malicious applications. We show that Intents are semantically rich features that are able to encode the intentions of malware when compared to other well-studied features such as permissions. We also argue that this type of feature is not the ultimate solution. It should be used in conjunction with other known features. We conducted experiments using a dataset containing 7406 applications that comprise 1846 clean and 5560 infected applications. The results show detection rate of 91% using Android Intent against 83% using Android permission. Additionally, experiment on combination of both features results in detection rate of 95.5%.

1 October 2005 in Computers & Security
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NCN.L. Clarke
N.L. Clarke
Steven FurnellSteven Furnell
Steven Furnell