Formerly regarded as a rare disease, bronchiectasis is increasingly recognised. A renewed interest in this disease has led to significant progress in bronchiectasis research. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the benefits of airway clearance techniques, inhaled antibiotics and long-term macrolide therapy in bronchiectasis patients. However, the heterogeneity of bronchiectasis remains one of the most challenging aspects of management. Phenotypes and endotypes of bronchiectasis have been identified to help find “treatable traits” and partially overcome disease complexity. The goals of therapy for bronchiectasis are to reduce the symptom burden, improve quality of life, reduce exacerbations and prevent disease progression. We review the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments that can improve mucociliary clearance, reduce airway inflammation and tackle airway infection, the key pathophysiological features of bronchiectasis. There are also promising treatments in development for the management of bronchiectasis, including novel anti-inflammatory therapies. This review provides a critical update on the management of bronchiectasis focusing on treatable traits and recent RCTs.

Background: There are limited data regarding the relationship between interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the natural course of COVID-19. In this study, we investigate whether patients with ILD are more susceptible to COVID-19 than those without ILD and evaluate the impact of ILD on disease severity in patients with COVID-19.Methods: A nationwide cohort of patients with COVID-19 (n=8070) and a 1:15 age-, sex- and residential area-matched cohort (n=121 050) were constructed between 1 January 2020 and 30 May 2020 in Korea. We performed a nested case–control study to compare the proportions of patients with ILD between the COVID-19 cohort and the matched cohort. Using the COVID-19 cohort, we also evaluated the risk of severe COVID-19 in patients with ILDversusthose without ILD.Results: The proportion of patients with ILD was significantly higher in the COVID-19 cohort than in the matched cohort (0.8%versus0.4%; p<0.001). The odds of having ILD was significantly higher in the COVID-19 cohort than in the matched cohort (adjusted OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.54–2.61). Among patients in the COVID-19 cohort, patients with ILD were more likely to have severe COVID-19 than patients without ILD (47.8%versus12.6%), including mortality (13.4%versus2.8%) (all p<0.001). The risk of severe COVID-19 was significantly higher in patients with ILD than in those without ILD (adjusted OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.24–4.01).Conclusion: The risks of COVID-19 and severe presentation were significantly higher in patients with ILD than in those without ILD.

Rationale: Although inflammation and infection are key disease drivers in bronchiectasis, few studies have integrated host inflammatory and microbiome data to guide precision medicine. Objectives: To identify clusters among patients with bronchiectasis on the basis of inflammatory markers and to assess the association between inflammatory endotypes, microbiome characteristics, and exacerbation risk. Methods: Patients with stable bronchiectasis were enrolled at three European centers, and cluster analysis was used to stratify the patients according to the levels of 33 sputum and serum inflammatory markers. Clusters were compared in terms of microbiome composition (16S ribosomal RNA sequencing) and exacerbation risk over a 12-month follow-up. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 199 patients were enrolled (109 [54.8%] female; median age, 69 yr). Four clusters of patients were defined according to their inflammatory profiles: cluster 1, milder neutrophilic inflammation; cluster 2, mixed-neutrophilic and type 2; cluster 3, most severe neutrophilic; and cluster 4, mixed-epithelial and type 2. Lower microbiome diversity was associated with more severe inflammatory clusters (P < 0.001), and β-diversity analysis demonstrated distinct microbiome profiles associated with each inflammatory cluster (P = 0.001). Proteobacteria and Pseudomonas at phylum and genus levels, respectively, were more enriched in clusters 2 and 3 than in clusters 1 and 4. Furthermore, patients in cluster 2 (rate ratio [RR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16–1.92) and cluster 3 (RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.12–2.32) were at higher risk of exacerbation over a 12-month follow-up compared with cluster 1, even after adjustment for prior exacerbation history. Conclusions: Bronchiectasis inflammatory endotypes are associated with distinct microbiome profiles and future exacerbation risk.

Background: Few studies have comprehensively evaluated the risk of lung cancer in tuberculosis survivors with consideration of smoking status and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Furthermore, little is known about lung cancer risk factors in tuberculosis survivors. Methods: This population-based cohort study enrolled tuberculosis survivors (n = 75 467) between 2010 and 2017 and 1:1 age- and sex-matched controls. Subjects were followed up for 1 year from the date of tuberculosis diagnosis to the date of the incident lung cancer, death, or December 2018, whichever came first. The risk of lung cancer was evaluated according to smoking and COPD status. We also evaluated the risk factors for lung cancer and developed an individualized lung cancer prediction model for tuberculosis survivors. Results: During a median follow-up duration of 4.8 years, the incident lung cancer risk was 1.72-fold higher in tuberculosis survivors than in the controls. Among tuberculosis survivors, those who were current smokers with ≥20 pack-years showed the highest risk of lung cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 6.78) compared with never-smoker, non–tuberculosis-infected controls. tuberculosis survivors with COPD had a higher risk (2.43) than non-COPD, non–tuberculosis-infected controls. Risk factors for lung cancer in tuberculosis survivors were pulmonary tuberculosis, age >60 years, smoking, and the presence of COPD or asthma. The individualized lung cancer risk model showed good discrimination (concordance statistic = 0.827). Conclusions: Previous tuberculosis infection is an independent risk factor regardless of smoking status or amount and COPD. Closer monitoring of tuberculosis survivors, especially heavy smokers or those with COPD, is needed for early lung cancer diagnosis.

Inhaled antibiotics are recommended conditionally by international bronchiectasis guidelines for the treatment of patients with bronchiectasis, but results of individual studies are inconsistent. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated promising results regarding the efficacy and safety of inhaled antibiotics in bronchiectasis. Subsequent publications have supplemented the existing body of evidence further in this area. To what extent do inhaled antibiotics demonstrate both efficacy and safety as a treatment option for adults with bronchiectasis? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of inhaled antibiotics in adult patients with bronchiectasis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for eligible studies. Studies were included if they enrolled adults with bronchiectasis diagnosed by CT imaging and had a treatment duration of at least 4 weeks. The primary end point was exacerbation frequency, with additional key efficacy end points including severe exacerbations, bacterial load, symptoms, quality of life, and FEV₁. Data were pooled through random-effects meta-analysis. Twenty studies involving 3,468 patients were included. Inhaled antibiotics were associated with reduced number of patients with exacerbations (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96), a slight reduction in exacerbation frequency (rate ratio [RR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.91), a probable reduction in the frequency of severe exacerbations (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31-0.74), and a likely slight increase in time to first exacerbation (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.94). Inhaled antibiotics likely lead to a slight increase in the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis respiratory symptom score (mean difference, 2.51; 95% CI, 0.44-4.31) and may reduce scores on the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (mean difference, -3.13; 95% CI, -5.93 to -0.32). Bacterial load consistently was reduced, but FEV₁ was not changed with treatment. Evidence suggests little to no difference in adverse effects between groups (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.75-1.30). Antibiotic-resistant organisms likely were increased by treatment. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, inhaled antibiotics resulted in a slight reduction in exacerbations, a probable reduction in severe exacerbations, and a likely slight improvement in symptoms and quality of life in adults with bronchiectasis. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; No.: CRD42023384694; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.