Daniel Machado

Dr. Daniel Machado

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2019 in Brain Stimulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDaniel Machado
Daniel Machado
GUGozde Unal
Gozde Unal
SASuellen M. Andrade
Suellen M. Andrade
AMALEXANDRE MOREIRA
ALEXANDRE MOREIRA
LALeandro R. Altimari
Leandro R. Altimari
AOAlexandre Okano
Alexandre Okano

15 November 2019 in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMEdgard Morya
Edgard Morya
KMKátia Monte-Silva
Kátia Monte-Silva
MBMarom Bikson
Marom Bikson
ZEZeinab Esmaeilpour
Zeinab Esmaeilpour
CBClaudinei Eduardo Biazoli
Claudinei Eduardo Biazoli
AOAlexandre Okano
Alexandre Okano
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique used to modulate neural tissue. Neuromodulation apparently improves cognitive functions in several neurologic diseases treatment and sports performance. In this study, we present a comprehensive, integrative review of tDCS for motor rehabilitation and motor learning in healthy individuals, athletes and multiple neurologic and neuropsychiatric conditions. We also report on neuromodulation mechanisms, main applications, current knowledge including areas such as language, embodied cognition, functional and social aspects, and future directions. We present the use and perspectives of new developments in tDCS technology, namely high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) which promises to overcome one of the main tDCS limitation (i.e., low focality) and its application for neurological disease, pain relief, and motor learning/rehabilitation. Finally, we provided information regarding the Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in clinical applications, Cerebellar tDCS (ctDCS) and its influence on motor learning, and TMS combined with electroencephalography (EEG) as a tool to evaluate tDCS effects on brain function.

1 November 2018 in Physiology & Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMALEXANDRE MOREIRA
ALEXANDRE MOREIRA
MAMarcelo Saldanha Aoki
Marcelo Saldanha Aoki
EFEmerson Franchini
Emerson Franchini
DMDaniel Machado
Daniel Machado
Ana Carolina PaludoAna Carolina Paludo
Ana Carolina Paludo
AOAlexandre Hideki Okano
Alexandre Hideki Okano

24 March 2022 in Neurophysiologie Clinique
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASuellen Marinho Andrade
Suellen Marinho Andrade
DMDaniel Machado
Daniel Machado
LSLeandro da Silva-Sauer
Leandro da Silva-Sauer
CRCláudio Teixeira Regis
Cláudio Teixeira Regis
CMCristina Katya Torres Teixeira Mendes
Cristina Katya Torres Teixeira Mendes
BFBernardino Fernández-calvo
Bernardino Fernández-calvo

1 April 2017 in Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKleverton Krinski
Kleverton Krinski
DMDaniel Machado
Daniel Machado
LLLuciana S. Lirani
Luciana S. Lirani
SDSergio G. DaSilva
Sergio G. DaSilva
ECEduardo Costa
Eduardo Costa
HEHassan Mohamed Elsangedy
Hassan Mohamed Elsangedy
In order to examine whether environmental settings influence psychological and physiological responses of women with obesity during self-paced walking, 38 women performed two exercise sessions (treadmill and outdoors) for 30 min, where oxygen uptake, heart rate, ratings of perceived exertion, affect, attentional focus, enjoyment, and future intentions to walk were analyzed. Physiological responses were similar during both sessions. However, during outdoor exercise, participants displayed higher externally focused attention, positive affect, and lower ratings of perceived exertion, followed by greater enjoyment and future intention to participate in outdoor walking. The more externally focused attention predicted greater future intentions to participate in walking. Therefore, women with obesity self-selected an appropriate exercise intensity to improve fitness and health in both environmental settings. Also, self-paced outdoor walking presented improved psychological responses. Health care professionals sh...

6 July 2021 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDaniel Machado
Daniel Machado
MBMarom Bikson
Marom Bikson
ADAbhishek Datta
Abhishek Datta
ECEgas Caparelli-Dáquer
Egas Caparelli-Dáquer
GUGozde Unal
Gozde Unal
AOAlexandre Okano
Alexandre Okano
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used aiming to boost exercise performance and inconsistent findings have been reported. One possible explanation is related to the limitations of the so-called “conventional” tDCS, which uses large rectangular electrodes, resulting in a diffuse electric field. A new tDCS technique called high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) has been recently developed. HD-tDCS uses small ring electrodes and produces improved focality and greater magnitude of its aftereffects. This study tested whether HD-tDCS would improve exercise performance to a greater extent than conventional tDCS. Twelve endurance athletes (29.4 ± 7.3 years; 60.15 ± 5.09 ml kg−1 min−1) were enrolled in this single-center, randomized, crossover, and sham-controlled trial. To test reliability, participants performed two time to exhaustion (TTE) tests (control conditions) on a cycle simulator with 80% of peak power until volitional exhaustion. Next, they randomly received HD-tDCS (2.4 mA), conventional (2.0 mA), or active sham tDCS (2.0 mA) over the motor cortex for 20-min before performing the TTE test. TTE, heart rate (HR), associative thoughts, peripheral (lower limbs), and whole-body ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded every minute. Outcome measures were reliable. There was no difference in TTE between HD-tDCS (853.1 ± 288.6 s), simulated conventional (827.8 ± 278.7 s), sham (794.3 ± 271.2 s), or control conditions (TTE1 = 751.1 ± 261.6 s or TTE2 = 770.8 ± 250.6 s) [F(1.95; 21.4) = 1.537; P = 0.24; η2p = 0.123]. There was no effect on peripheral or whole-body RPE and associative thoughts (P > 0.05). No serious adverse effect was reported. A single session of neither HD-tDCS nor conventional tDCS changed exercise performance and psychophysiological responses in athletes, suggesting that a ceiling effect may exist.