Elisabet Fernández-Gómez

Prof. Elisabet Fernández-Gómez

Departamento de Enfermería, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Campus Melilla, Universidad de Granada, Calle Santander s / n, 52001 Melilla, España
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 April 2020 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Elisabet Fernández-GómezElisabet Fernández-Gómez
Elisabet Fernández-Gómez
AMAdelina Martín-Salvador
Adelina Martín-Salvador
TLTrinidad Luque-Vara
Trinidad Luque-Vara
María Angustias Sánchez-OjedaMaría Angustias Sánchez-Ojeda
María Angustias Sánchez-Ojeda
SNSilvia Navarro-Prado
Silvia Navarro-Prado
CMCarmen Enrique Mirón
Carmen Enrique Mirón
The aim of this study was to conduct content validation through expert judgement of an instrument which explores the nutritional knowledge, beliefs, and habits during pregnancy. This is a psychometric study in which 14 experts participated in the evaluation of each of the questionnaire items, which were divided into two blocks according to the characteristics of sufficiency, clarity, coherence, and relevance. Fleiss’ κ statistic was used to measure strength of agreement. A pre-test with 102 participants was conducted to measure the degree of understandability of the instrument. The strength of agreement obtained for each of the dimensions was almost perfect. For each pair of experts, strength of agreement ranged between substantial and almost perfect. Sufficiency was the characteristic of the questionnaire that obtained the highest values in the two blocks, and was also the most statistically significant (p < 0.001). Coherence was the most statistically significant characteristic in the first block (p = 0.030). Clarity was the most statistically significant characteristic in the second block (p = 0.037). The wording of five of the twenty original items was corrected. The new version of the instrument attained a high degree of understandability. The results suggest that the instrument is valid and may therefore be applied.

19 June 2020 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
María López-OlivaresMaría López-Olivares
María López-Olivares
Miriam Mohatar-BarbaMiriam Mohatar-Barba
Miriam Mohatar-Barba
Elisabet Fernández-GómezElisabet Fernández-Gómez
Elisabet Fernández-Gómez
CMCarmen Enrique Mirón
Carmen Enrique Mirón
A certain link exists between the consumption of particular groups of food and well-being. In this study, we analyzed in depth the relationship between strict adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MD) and emotional well-being through a descriptive, exploratory, transversal, and correlational study of students from the Campus of Melilla, University of Granada, Spain. The sample consisted of 272 individuals. Adherence to the MD was measured with the PREvención con DIetaMEDiterránea (PREDIMED) questionnaire, emotional well-being (both positive and negative affection) with the Spanish version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), the state of perceived health with the Short Form-36 (SF36), and the degree of physical activity using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF). A strict adherence to the MD was found to be significantly related to positive emotional state (β = 0.018, p = 0.009). The perceived state of health (β = 0.192, p < 0.001), mental role (β = 0.346, p < 0.001), and physical activity (β = 0.155, p = 0.007) were found to be predictive factors of a positive emotional state. Conversely, the relationship between the adherence to the MD and a negative emotional state was not significant. Various components of the MD were found to be independently connected to well-being. The results suggest that adopting a nutritional pattern such as the MD is linked to an improvement in emotional well-being.

23 October 2020 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Elisabet Fernández-GómezElisabet Fernández-Gómez
Elisabet Fernández-Gómez
TLTrinidad Luque-Vara
Trinidad Luque-Vara
PFP.J. Moya Fernández
P.J. Moya Fernández
María López-OlivaresMaría López-Olivares
María López-Olivares
Miguel Ángel Gallardo-VigilMiguel Ángel Gallardo-Vigil
Miguel Ángel Gallardo-Vigil
CMCarmen Enrique Mirón
Carmen Enrique Mirón
The aim of this study was to identify dietary patterns in pregnant women and to assess the relationships between sociodemographic, lifestyle-related, and pregnancy-related factors. This is a descriptive, correlational study involving 306 pregnant women in Melilla (Spain) in any trimester of pregnancy. A validated food frequency questionnaire was used. Dietary patterns were determined via exploratory factor analysis and ordinal logistic regression using the proportional odds model. Three dietary patterns were identified: Western, mixed, and prudent. Sociodemographic, lifestyle-related, and pregnancy-related factors influencing dietary quality were established. The Western dietary pattern was considered the least recommended despite being the most common among women who live in Melilla (p = 0.03), are Christian (p = 0.01), are primiparous women (p < 0.001), and are in their first or second trimester (p = 0.02). Unemployed pregnant women were also more likely to have a less healthy dietary pattern (β = −0.716; p = 0.040). The prudent dietary pattern, the healthiest of the three, was most commonly observed among Muslim women (p = 0.01), women with more than two children (p < 0.001), and women in the third trimester of pregnancy (p = 0.02). Pregnant women who engaged in no physical activity or a low level of physical activity displayed a mixed pattern (p < 0.001). This study provides evidence on the factors influencing dietary patterns during pregnancy and suggests that more specific nutrition programmes should be developed to improve the nutritional status of pregnant women.

AMAdelina Martín-Salvador
Adelina Martín-Salvador
KSKarima Saddiki-Mimoun
Karima Saddiki-Mimoun
MªÁngeles Pérez-MorenteMªÁngeles Pérez-Morente
MªÁngeles Pérez-Morente
MARIA ADELAIDA ALVAREZ-SERRANOMARIA ADELAIDA ALVAREZ-SERRANO
MARIA ADELAIDA ALVAREZ-SERRANO
MGMaría Gázquez-López
María Gázquez-López
Elisabet Fernández-GómezElisabet Fernández-Gómez
Elisabet Fernández-Gómez
Dating violence is a significant problem among adolescents. It encompasses a variety of violent behavior, from verbal abuse to physical and sexual abuse, from threats to rape and murder. Among young people, idealization of love and romantic myths are very common as a consequence of our culture and society, which lead them to develop dysfunctional relationships that somehow favor and facilitate partner violence and sexist ideas in daily life. Education is the basic tool to eradicate discrimination and violence against women. The objective of this study is to explore the false myths of romantic love in adolescents and their related factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 16–19-year-old teenagers (n = 180), through questionnaires and by employing the romantic love myths scale, the ambivalent sexism inventory, and the love attitudes scale. Adolescents accepted to a greater degree the love myths associated with idealization than those related to abuse with scale values of Med = 2.72, SD = 0.55, and Med = 1.34, SD = 0.68, respectively. Designed models predict love idealization on the basis of benevolent sexism (β = 0.03; CI 95% = 0.021–0.039), religion (β = 0.198; CI 95% = 0.047–0.349), passionate love (β = 0.038; CI 95% = 0.015–0.061), practical love (β = 0.024; CI 95% = 0.001–0.047), and friendly love (β = 0.036; CI 95% = 0.014–0.058). Hostile sexism and undergraduate studies were associated with the myths that relate love and abuse (β = 0.19; CI 95% = 0.007–0.031, β = 0.208; CI 95% = 0.001–0.414, respectively).

6 June 2023 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNSilvia Navarro-Prado
Silvia Navarro-Prado
MTMaría Isabel Tovar-Gálvez
María Isabel Tovar-Gálvez
María Angustias Sánchez-OjedaMaría Angustias Sánchez-Ojeda
María Angustias Sánchez-Ojeda
TLTrinidad Luque-Vara
Trinidad Luque-Vara
Elisabet Fernández-GómezElisabet Fernández-Gómez
Elisabet Fernández-Gómez
AJAna Eugenia Marín Jiménez
Ana Eugenia Marín Jiménez
The aim is to identify the source of sexuality education used during childhood and adolescence and to analyse whether this education influences their sexual attitudes, their ability to cope with unwanted situations they experience and their satisfaction with their sexual lives. This is a non-experimental, quantitative, ex post facto, cross-sectional study. The sample is formed of 675 young people, with 50% of the ages included being between 20 (Quartile 1) and 22 (Quartile 3) years. The data collection was done by means of an online questionnaire, including sociodemographic and Likert questions about their sex life. Fisher “Independence Contrasts”and correlations were used to see and quantify the relationship among the variables. The main source of education was pornography (29.3%) and the internet (12.4%). The source of education has a significant relationship with whether the use of contraceptives is accepted or not (p < 0.001), refusal to use contraceptives (p < 0.001), engaging in risky sexual practices (p < 0.001), facing unwanted sexual situations (p < 0.001) and dissatisfaction with their sex life (p < 0.001). It is necessary that children and adolescents have sex education in safe environments, such as in a home or school setting, and the school nurse plays a vital part in this education. This would reduce the need for adolescents and young people to use the internet and pornography as a source of education. School nurses should be the educational axis to offer children and adolescents a reliable point of information about sex education. A joint work with teachers, nurses, students and parents would contribute positively to reduce the number of risky situations young people are facing, and it would promote and improve healthy attitudes towards sex and interpersonal relationships.

TLTrinidad Luque-Vara
Trinidad Luque-Vara
MLMarta Linares-Manrique
Marta Linares-Manrique
Elisabet Fernández-GómezElisabet Fernández-Gómez
Elisabet Fernández-Gómez
AMAdelina Martín-Salvador
Adelina Martín-Salvador
María Angustias Sánchez-OjedaMaría Angustias Sánchez-Ojeda
María Angustias Sánchez-Ojeda
CMCarmen Enrique Mirón
Carmen Enrique Mirón
The objective of this study was to describe the content validation, through expert judgment, of a questionnaire for determining the level of knowledge that school teachers have of diabetes in order to design relevant educational interventions to improve the health of school-aged children. This psychometric study involved 15 experts who assessed each of the items in the instrument. The results revealed that the strength of agreement shown by the questionnaire ranged from substantial to almost perfect in its four dimensions, with the characteristics of “sufficiency” and “relevance” having the highest scores (0.982 and 0.903, respectively) based on the judgments made by the participating experts. Regarding statistical significance, the characteristics “sufficiency”, with p < 0.001, and “relevance”, with p = 0.001, were particularly relevant. The overall degree of understandability for the new version of the instrument was high (91.54%). The psychometric results obtained from validation of the “grado de conocimientos sobre diabetes en docentes del ámbito escolar” (Spanish for “level of knowledge of diabetes in school teachers”)—GCDDaE questionnaire through expert judgment and the pre-test indicate that it is recommended for use as it is both relevant and quick and easy to administer.