Our understanding of altered patterns of gene expression being responsible for many diseases has been growing thanks to modern molecular biological methods. Today, these changes can only be identified when tissue samples are available. Therefore, a noninvasive method allowing us to monitor gene expression in vivo would be valuable, not only as a research tool, but also for patient stratification before treatment and for treatment follow-up. Antisense oligonucleotides (ODN) have been considered to be suitable molecules to trace active genes in vivo, as well as to treat diseases by hybridising to its complementary messenger RNA (mRNA) sequence in the cells thereby preventing the synthesis of the peptide. However, the use of ODNs in the organisms are endangered by many hurdles such as physical barriers to pass and enzyme attack to be avoided. Positron emission tomography (PET) provides a most advanced in vivo imaging technology that allows the exploration of the fate of radionuclide-labelled antisense ODNs in the body; thereby providing information about biodistribution and quantitative accumulation in tissues to assess pharmacokinetic properties of ODNs. This kind of evaluation is important as part of the characterisation of antisense therapeutics but also as part of the development of antisense imaging agents. This review provides a general summary about the antisense concept and displays the present status of the antisense imaging field with the major achievements and remaining challenges on the long journey towards accomplishing in vivo monitoring of gene expression using PET.

In vivo monitoring of gene expression may be accomplished using a most advanced imaging technology such as positron emission tomography (PET). However, a range of methodological and biological hurdles needs exploration. In the present study, 20-mer DNA–LNA (locked nucleic acid) mixmer oligonucleotides specific for rat Chromogranin-A (Chg-A) mRNA were labeled with ⁶⁸ Ga and their biodistribution were investigated in rats; namely, two Antisense (LNA1, LNA2—differing only in the positioning of LNA modification), Mismatched, and Sense sequences. In addition, in vivo and in vitro metabolite analysis of LNA1 and LNA2 was compared, and hybridization in solution was performed to verify the hybridization ability after labeling. Furthermore, semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction was carried out to find organs expressing Chg-A mRNA in the rat. The biodistribution patterns altered according to the sequence and the positioning of LNA modification. The pattern of Mismatched—differing only in two nucleotides from the two Antisenses—was similar to that of Sense, whereas the pattern of LNA1 and LNA2 showed differences. Uptake in the adrenal gland was twofold higher with LNA2 compared to the other three oligonucleotides. Intact LNA2 could be observed in the 60-minute sample in vivo , whereas in vitro , the intact compound of both Antisenses could also be detected after 2 hours. Hybridization in solution revealed that the two Antisenses retained their hybridization abilities after ⁶⁸ Ga-labeling. With decreasing magnitude, Chg-A mRNA was expressed in the adrenal gland, intestine, testis, and pancreas. This study further supported LNA–DNA mixmer to be a favorable modification for antisense targeting approach with respect to hybridization and longer plasma residence; however, the organ uptake was dominated by processes irrelevant to specific hybridization.