Ju-Seop Kang

Prof. Dr. Ju-Seop Kang

Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2009 in The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ju-Seop KangJu-Seop Kang
Ju-Seop Kang
MLMin-Ho Lee
Min-Ho Lee
Kang JS, et al. Korean J Intern Med. 2009 Mar;24(1):1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2009.24.1.1

1 January 2018 in The Korean Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YKYong-Seok Kim
Yong-Seok Kim
JAJae-Sung Ahn
Jae-Sung Ahn
SKSemi Kim
Semi Kim
HKHyun-Jin Kim
Hyun-Jin Kim
SKShin-Hee Kim
Shin-Hee Kim
Ju-Seop KangJu-Seop Kang
Ju-Seop Kang
Kim YS, et al. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;22(2):113-125. https://doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2018.22.2.113

1 January 2011 in The Korean Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ju-Seop KangJu-Seop Kang
Ju-Seop Kang
YPYoo-Sin Park
Yoo-Sin Park
SKShin-Hee Kim
Shin-Hee Kim
SKSang-Hyun Kim
Sang-Hyun Kim
MJMin-Young Jun
Min-Young Jun
Kang J, et al. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2011 Apr;15(2):67-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2011.15.2.67

1 January 2001 in Journal of Korean Medical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHyun Kil Kang
Hyun Kil Kang
DKDong Keon Kim
Dong Keon Kim
BLBong Hwa Lee
Bong Hwa Lee
AOAe Son Om
Ae Son Om
JHJoung Hee Hong
Joung Hee Hong
Ju-Seop KangJu-Seop Kang
Ju-Seop Kang
Kang HK, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2001 Oct;16(5):598-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2001.16.5.598

19 February 2022 in Journal of Infection and Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WAWen An
Wen An
QWQiuyang Wang
Qiuyang Wang
TKTae-Eun Kim
Tae-Eun Kim
Ju-Seop KangJu-Seop Kang
Ju-Seop Kang
Although many studies have reported cases of COVID-19 infection in transplant recipients, most of them only involve a small number of patients and narrow geographic areas. This study aims to investigate the clinical characteristics, morbidity, severity, and mortality of COVID-19 infection among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients by meta-analysis. We performed a literature search using the databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar as of November 26, 2020. We included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies, excluding case reports and small case series (n < 10). The pooled incidence proportion and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate the combined results of forty-seven studies were included for the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2. Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation was used to stabilize the specific rate variance. Publication bias was using Egger’s test. The morbidity rate of COVID-19 in SOT recipients was 2.10% [95% CI 1.35–3.01], and the proportion of severe infection was 22.46% [95% CI 15.74–29.90]. The mortality rate was 17.38% [95% CI 13.72–21.34]. In the analysis by transplanted organ, the proportion of patients with severe infection was highest in recipients of two or more transplants 48.85% [95% CI 11.88–86.38]. The mortality rate was highest in lung transplant recipients 25.12% [95% CI 16.94–34.00]. The most common symptoms of COVID-19 in SOT recipients were fever (73.39%), cough (58.90%), and respiratory symptoms (45.77%). SOT was a risk factor for worse COVID-19 outcomes, although the morbidity of COVID-19 in SOT recipients was not markedly higher than the general population. These results may change when our understanding of the disease progress.

1 September 2021 in Journal of Infection and Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WAWen An
Wen An
Ju-Seop KangJu-Seop Kang
Ju-Seop Kang
QWQiuyang Wang
Qiuyang Wang
TKTae-Eun Kim
Tae-Eun Kim
To systematically investigate the relationship between cardiac biomarkers and COVID-19 severity and mortality. We performed a literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied to estimate the combined results of 67 studies. A meta-analysis of cardiac biomarkers was used to evaluate disease mortality and severity in COVID-19 patients. A meta-analysis of 7812 patients revealed that patients with high levels of cardiac troponin I (SMD = 0.81 U/L, 95% CI = 0.14–1.48, P = 0.017), cardiac troponin T (SMD = 0.78 U/L, 95% CI = 0.07–1.49, P = 0.032), high-sensitive cardiac troponin I (SMD = 0.66 pg/mL, 95% CI = 0.51–0.81, P < 0.001), high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (SMD = 0.93 U/L, 95% CI = 0.21–1.65, P = 0.012), creatine kinase-MB (SMD = 0.54 U/L, 95% CI = 0.39−0.69, P < 0.001), and myoglobin (SMD = 0.80 U/L, 95% CI = 0.57–1.03, P < 0.001) were associated with prominent disease severity in COVID-19 infection. Moreover, 9532 patients with a higher serum level of cardiac troponin I (SMD = 0.51 U/L, 95% CI = 0.37–0.64, P < 0.001), high-sensitive cardiac troponin (SMD = 0.51 ng/L, 95% CI = 0.29–0.73, P < 0.001), high-sensitive cardiac troponin I (SMD = 0.51 pg/mL, 95% CI = 0.38–0.63, P < 0.001), high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (SMD = 0.85 U/L, 95% CI = 0.63–1.07, P < 0.001), creatine kinase-MB (SMD = 0.48 U/L, 95% CI = 0.32–0.65, P < 0.001), and myoglobin (SMD = 0.55 U/L, 95% CI = 0.45−0.65, P < 0.001) exhibited a prominent level of mortality from COVID-19 infection. Cardiac biomarkers (cardiac troponin I, cardiac troponin T, high-sensitive cardiac troponin, high-sensitive cardiac troponin I, high-sensitive cardiac troponin T, creatine kinase-MB, and myoglobin) should be more frequently applied in identifying high-risk COVID-19 patients so that timely treatment can be implemented to reduce severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients.