Markus Lill

Prof. Markus Lill

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 October 2010 in Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MLMarkus Lill
Markus Lill
MDMatthew L. Danielson
Matthew L. Danielson

22 February 2021 in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAndré Fischer
André Fischer
Martin SmieškoMartin Smieško
Martin Smieško
MSManuel Sellner
Manuel Sellner
MLMarkus Lill
Markus Lill

7 February 2015 in Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LKLaura J. Kingsley
Laura J. Kingsley
MLMarkus Lill
Markus Lill

14 November 2013 in The Journal of Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAli Sadeghi
Ali Sadeghi
SGS. Alireza Ghasemi
S. Alireza Ghasemi
BSBastian Schaefer
Bastian Schaefer
SMStephan Mohr
Stephan Mohr
MLMarkus Lill
Markus Lill
SGStefan Goedecker
Stefan Goedecker
In order to characterize molecular structures we introduce configurational fingerprint vectors which are counterparts of quantities used experimentally to identify structures. The Euclidean distance between the configurational fingerprint vectors satisfies the properties of a metric and can therefore safely be used to measure dissimilarities between configurations in the high dimensional configuration space. In particular we show that these metrics are a perfect and computationally cheap replacement for the root-mean-square distance (RMSD) when one has to decide whether two noise contaminated configurations are identical or not. We introduce a Monte Carlo approach to obtain the global minimum of the RMSD between configurations, which is obtained from a global minimization over all translations, rotations, and permutations of atomic indices.

1 April 2011 in Future Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GWGregory L Wilson
Gregory L Wilson
MLMarkus Lill
Markus Lill
Methods utilized in computer-aided drug design can be classified into two major categories: structure based and ligand based, using information on the structure of the protein or on the biological and physicochemical properties of bound ligands, respectively. In recent years there has been a trend towards integrating these two methods in order to enhance the reliability and efficiency of computer-aided drug-design approaches by combining information from both the ligand and the protein. This trend resulted in a variety of methods that include: pseudoreceptor methods, pharmacophore methods, fingerprint methods and approaches integrating docking with similarity-based methods. In this article, we will describe the concepts behind each method and selected applications.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAndré Fischer
André Fischer
MSManuel Sellner
Manuel Sellner
SNSanthosh Neranjan
Santhosh Neranjan
Martin SmieškoMartin Smieško
Martin Smieško
MLMarkus Lill
Markus Lill
The rapid outbreak of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in China followed by its spread around the world poses a serious global concern for public health. To this date, no specific drugs or vaccines are available to treat SARS-CoV-2 despite its close relation to the SARS-CoV virus that caused a similar epidemic in 2003. Thus, there remains an urgent need for the identification and development of specific antiviral therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2. To conquer viral infections, the inhibition of proteases essential for proteolytic processing of viral polyproteins is a conventional therapeutic strategy. In order to find novel inhibitors, we computationally screened a compound library of over 606 million compounds for binding at the recently solved crystal structure of the main protease (Mpro) of SARS-CoV-2. A screening of such a vast chemical space for SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitors has not been reported before. After shape screening, two docking protocols were applied followed by the determination of molecular descriptors relevant for pharmacokinetics to narrow down the number of initial hits. Next, molecular dynamics simulations were conducted to validate the stability of docked binding modes and comprehensively quantify ligand binding energies. After evaluation of potential off-target binding, we report a list of 12 purchasable compounds, with binding affinity to the target protease that is predicted to be more favorable than that of the cocrystallized peptidomimetic compound. In order to quickly advise ongoing therapeutic intervention for patients, we evaluated approved antiviral drugs and other protease inhibitors to provide a list of nine compounds for drug repurposing. Furthermore, we identified the natural compounds (−)-taxifolin and rhamnetin as potential inhibitors of Mpro. Rhamnetin is already commercially available in pharmacies.