Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is performed worldwide for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TACE has produced survival advantages in two randomized controlled trials and a meta-analysis, and is currently the mainstay of treatment for this stage of HCC. However, there are currently no global guidelines regarding the dose, choice or combination of cytotoxic agents for TACE; therefore, it is difficult to compare data from different TACE studies. In Japan, most of the TACE procedures have been based on iodized oil as conventional TACE, utilizing the microembolic and drug-carrying characteristic of iodized oil. Superselective TACE with lipiodol is the primary TACE procedure that has reported satisfactory levels of local control associated with a lower risk of complications. Conversely, TACE performed using drug-eluting beads has been widely used in western countries, and this has shown similar tumor response and median survival compared to conventional TACE. Moreover, the combination of TACE and molecular targeted agents is now ongoing to evaluate the synergistic effect. In this review, the indication, technical issues, and complications of TACE are reviewed.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate and identify the specific CT findings by focusing on abnormalities in the main pancreatic duct (MPD) and pancreatic parenchyma in patients with small pancreatic cancer (PC) including carcinoma in situ (CIS). Methods: Nine CT findings indicating abnormalities of MPD and pancreatic parenchyma were selected as candidate findings for the presence of small PC ≤ 10 mm. The proportions of patients positive for each finding were compared between small PC and benign MPD stenosis groups. Interobserver agreement between two independent image reviewers was evaluated using kappa statistics. Results: The final analysis included 24 patients with small PC (including 11 CIS patients) and 28 patients with benign MPD stenosis. The proportion of patients exhibiting partial pancreatic parenchymal atrophy (PPA) corresponding to the distribution of MPD stenosis (45.8% vs. 7.1%, p < 0.01), upstream PPA arising from the site of MPD stenosis (33.3% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.01), and MPD abrupt stenosis (45.8% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.03) was significantly higher in the small PC group than in the benign MPD stenosis group. Conclusions: The presence of partial PPA, upstream PPA, and MPD abrupt stenosis on a CT image was highly suggestive of the presence of small PCs including CIS.

Purpose To evaluate the performance of a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system at detecting pulmonary nodules on CT by comparing radiologists’ readings with and without CAD. Materials and methods A total of 120 chest CT images were randomly selected from patients with suspected lung cancer. The gold standard of nodules ≥ 3 mm was established by a panel of three expert radiologists. Two less experienced radiologists read the images without and afterward with CAD system. Their reading times were recorded. Results The radiologists’ sensitivity increased from 20.9% to 38.0% with the introduction of CAD. The positive predictive value (PPV) decreased from 70.5% to 61.8%, and the F1-score increased from 32.2% to 47.0%. The sensitivity significantly increased from 13.7% to 32.4% for small nodules (3–6 mm) and from 33.3% to 47.6% for medium nodules (6–10 mm). CAD alone showed a sensitivity of 70.3%, a PPV of 57.9%, and an F1-score of 63.5%. Reading time decreased by 11.3% with the use of CAD. Conclusion CAD improved the less experienced radiologists’ sensitivity in detecting pulmonary nodules of all sizes, especially including a significant improvement in the detection of clinically important-sized medium nodules (6–10 mm) as well as small nodules (3–6 mm) and reduced their reading time.

Although programmed cell death protein 1 (PD−1)/PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade is effective in a subset of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), its therapeutic response is still unsatisfactory. Alternatively, the potential impact of the lenvatinib in patients who showed tumor progression on PD−1/PD-L1 blockade is unknown. In this work, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib administration after PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade. The outcome and safety of lenvatinib administered after PD-1/PD-L1 blockade failure was analyzed retrospectively in 36 patients. Tumor growth was assessed every 4–8 weeks using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The mean relative dose intensity of lenvatinib was 87.6% and 77.8% in patients receiving a starting dose of 8 (interquartile range (IQR), 77.5–100.0) mg and 12 (IQR, 64.4–100.0) mg, respectively. Since lenvatinib therapy initiation, the median progression-free survival was 10 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 8.3–11.8) and the median overall survival was 15.8 months (95% CI: 8.5–23.2). The objective response rate was 55.6%, and the disease control rate was 86.1%. No particular safety concerns were observed. Lenvatinib demonstrated considerable antitumor effects with acceptable safety in patients with progressive and unresectable HCC when administered right after PD-1/PD-L1 blockade failure.