Stefan Huttelmaier

Prof. Dr. Stefan Huttelmaier

Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Charles Tanford Protein Centre, Halle (Saale), Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 October 2012 in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJessica L. Bell
Jessica L. Bell
KWKristin Wächter
Kristin Wächter
BMBritta Mühleck
Britta Mühleck
NPNikolaos Pazaitis
Nikolaos Pazaitis
MKMarcel Köhn
Marcel Köhn
SHStefan Huttelmaier
Stefan Huttelmaier
The insulin-like growth factor-2 mRNA-binding proteins 1, 2, and 3 (IGF2BP1, IGF2BP2, IGF2BP3) belong to a conserved family of RNA-binding, oncofetal proteins. Several studies have shown that these proteins act in various important aspects of cell function, such as cell polarization, migration, morphology, metabolism, proliferation and differentiation. In this review, we discuss the IGF2BP family’s role in cancer biology and how this correlates with their proposed functions during embryogenesis. IGF2BPs are mainly expressed in the embryo, in contrast with comparatively lower or negotiable levels in adult tissues. IGF2BP1 and IGF2BP3 have been found to be re-expressed in several aggressive cancer types. Control of IGF2BPs’ expression is not well understood; however, let-7 microRNAs, β-catenin (CTNNB1) and MYC have been proposed to be involved in their regulation. In contrast to many other RNA-binding proteins, IGF2BPs are almost exclusively observed in the cytoplasm where they associate with target mRNAs in cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein complexes (mRNPs). During development, IGF2BPs are required for proper nerve cell migration and morphological development, presumably involving the control of cytoskeletal remodeling and dynamics, respectively. Likewise, IGF2BPs modulate cell polarization, adhesion and migration in tumor-derived cells. Moreover, they are highly associated with cancer metastasis and the expression of oncogenic factors (KRAS, MYC and MDR1). However, a pro-metastatic role of IGF2BPs remains controversial due to the lack of ‘classical’ in vivo studies. Nonetheless, IGF2BPs could provide valuable targets in cancer treatment with many of their in vivo roles to be fully elucidated.

24 November 2005 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SHStefan Huttelmaier
Stefan Huttelmaier
DZDaniel Zenklusen
Daniel Zenklusen
MLMarcell Lederer
Marcell Lederer
JDJason Dictenberg
Jason Dictenberg
MLMike Lorenz
Mike Lorenz
RSRobert H. Singer
Robert H. Singer

24 November 2008 in RNA
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DWDoreen Weidensdorfer
Doreen Weidensdorfer
NSNadine Stöhr
Nadine Stöhr
ABAnne Baude
Anne Baude
MLMarcell Lederer
Marcell Lederer
MKMarcel Köhn
Marcel Köhn
SHStefan Huttelmaier
Stefan Huttelmaier
The RNA-binding protein IGF2BP1 (IGF-II mRNA binding protein 1) stabilizes the c-myc RNA by associating with the Coding Region instability Determinant (CRD). If and how other proteins cooperate with IGF2BP1 in promoting stabilization of the c-myc mRNA via the CRD remained elusive. Here, we identify various RNA-binding proteins that associate with IGF2BP1 in an RNA-dependent fashion. Four of these proteins (HNRNPU, SYNCRIP, YBX1, and DHX9) were essential to ensure stabilization of the c-myc mRNA via the CRD. These factors associate with IGF2BP1 in a CRD-dependent manner, co-distribute with IGF2BP1 in non-polysomal fractions comprising c-myc mRNA, and colocalize with IGF2BP1 in the cytoplasm. A selective shift of relative c-myc mRNA levels to the polysomal fraction is observed upon IGF2BP1 knockdown. These findings suggest that IGF2BP1 in complex with at least four proteins promotes CRD-mediated mRNA stabilization. Complex formation at the CRD presumably limits the transfer of c-myc mRNA to the polysomal fraction and subsequent translation-coupled decay.

29 October 2018 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSimon Müller
Simon Müller
Markus GlaßMarkus Glaß
Markus Glaß
ASAnurag K Singh
Anurag K Singh
JHJacob Haase
Jacob Haase
NBNadine Bley
Nadine Bley
SHStefan Huttelmaier
Stefan Huttelmaier
The oncofetal mRNA-binding protein IGF2BP1 and the transcriptional regulator SRF modulate gene expression in cancer. In cancer cells, we demonstrate that IGF2BP1 promotes the expression of SRF in a conserved and N6-methyladenosine (m6A)-dependent manner by impairing the miRNA-directed decay of the SRF mRNA. This results in enhanced SRF-dependent transcriptional activity and promotes tumor cell growth and invasion. At the post-transcriptional level, IGF2BP1 sustains the expression of various SRF-target genes. The majority of these SRF/IGF2BP1-enhanced genes, including PDLIM7 and FOXK1, show conserved upregulation with SRF and IGF2BP1 synthesis in cancer. PDLIM7 and FOXK1 promote tumor cell growth and were reported to enhance cell invasion. Consistently, 35 SRF/IGF2BP1-dependent genes showing conserved association with SRF and IGF2BP1 expression indicate a poor overall survival probability in ovarian, liver and lung cancer. In conclusion, these findings identify the SRF/IGF2BP1-, miRNome- and m6A-dependent control of gene expression as a conserved oncogenic driver network in cancer.

1 December 2014 in Seminars in Cancer Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMarcell Lederer
Marcell Lederer
NBNadine Bley
Nadine Bley
CSChristian Schleifer
Christian Schleifer
SHStefan Huttelmaier
Stefan Huttelmaier
The post-transcriptional control of gene expression mediated by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as well as miRNAs is essential to determine tumor cell fate and thus is a major determinant in cancerogenesis. The IGF2 mRNA binding protein family (IGF2BPs) comprises three RBPs. Two members of the family, IGF2BP1 and IGF2BP3, are bona fide oncofetal proteins, which are de novo synthesized in various human cancers. In vitro studies revealed that IGF2BPs serve as post-transcriptional fine-tuners modulating the expression of genes implicated in the control of tumor cell proliferation, survival, chemo-resistance and metastasis. Consistently, the expression of both IGF2BP family members was reported to correlate with an overall poor prognosis and metastasis in various human cancers. Due to the fact that most reports used a pan-IGF2BP antibody for studying IGF2BP expression in cancer, paralogue-specific functions can barely be evaluated at present. Nonetheless, the accordance of IGF2BPs' role in promoting an aggressive phenotype of tumor-derived cells in vitro and their upregulated expression in aggressive malignancies provides strong evidence that IGF2BPs are powerful post-transcriptional oncogenes enhancing tumor growth, drug-resistance and metastasis. This suggests IGF2BPs as powerful biomarkers and candidate targets for cancer therapy.

5 March 2021 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QLQing Lan
Qing Lan
PLPei Y. Liu
Pei Y. Liu
JBJessica L. Bell
Jessica L. Bell
JWJenny Y Wang
Jenny Y Wang
SHStefan Huttelmaier
Stefan Huttelmaier
TLTao Liu
Tao Liu
RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification occurs in approximately 25% of mRNAs at the transcriptome-wide level. RNA m6A is regulated by the RNA m6A methyltransferases methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3), METTL14, and METTL16 (writers), demethylases FTO and ALKBH5 (erasers), and binding proteins YTHDC1–2, YTHDF1–3, IGF2BP1–3, and SND1 (readers). These RNA m6A modification proteins are frequently upregulated or downregulated in human cancer tissues and are often associated with poor patient prognosis. By modulating pre-mRNA splicing, mRNA nuclear export, decay, stability, and translation of oncogenic and tumor suppressive transcripts, RNA m6A modification proteins regulate cancer cell proliferation, survival, migration, invasion, tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, and sensitivity to anticancer therapies. Importantly, small-molecule activators of METTL3, as well as inhibitors of METTL3, FTO, ALKBH5, and IGF2BP1 have recently been identified and have shown considerable anticancer effects when administered alone or in combination with other anticancer agents, both in vitro and in mouse models of human cancers. Future compound screening and design of more potent and selective RNA m6A modification protein inhibitors and activators are expected to provide novel anticancer agents, appropriate for clinical trials in patients with cancer tissues harboring aberrant RNA m6A modification protein expression or RNA m6A modification protein–induced resistance to cancer therapy.