José Fernando Borges

Dr. José Fernando Borges

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2001 in Tectonophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJosé Fernando Borges
José Fernando Borges
AFAugusto J.S Fitas
Augusto J.S Fitas
MBMourad Bezzeghoud
Mourad Bezzeghoud
PTPaula Teves-Costa
Paula Teves-Costa

1 May 2007 in Tectonophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJosé Fernando Borges
José Fernando Borges
MBMourad Bezzeghoud
Mourad Bezzeghoud
EBE. Buforn
E. Buforn
CPC. Pro
C. Pro
AFA. Fitas
A. Fitas

1 November 2007 in Geophysical Journal International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRaphaël Grandin
Raphaël Grandin
JBJosé Fernando Borges
José Fernando Borges
MBMourad Bezzeghoud
Mourad Bezzeghoud
BCBento Caldeira
Bento Caldeira
FCFernando Carrilho
Fernando Carrilho
Summary. This is the second paper of a series of two concerning strong ground motion in SW Iberia due to earthquakes originating from the adjacent Atlantic are

9 January 2018 in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SVSusana P. Vilanova
Susana P. Vilanova
JNJoão Narciso
João Narciso
JCJoão Gameira Carvalho
João Gameira Carvalho
ILIsabel Lopes
Isabel Lopes
MQMário Quinta‐Ferreira
Mário Quinta‐Ferreira
ENEliza S. Nemser
Eliza S. Nemser
The inclusion of site‐specific conditions is essential to adequately represent the seismic hazard and the seismic risk for a region. We acquired, gathered, and organized a near‐surface shear‐wave velocity database for Portugal and applied a three‐step methodological approach for developing a VS30 site‐condition map using extrapolation based on surface geology. The methodology includes (1) defining a preliminary set of geologically defined units, (2) calculating the probability distribution of logVS30 for each unit, and (3) merging the units according to the results of statistical tests. The final model comprises three geologically defined units characterized by logVS30 distributions that are statistically significantly different from each other: F1, igneous, metamorphic, and old sedimentary rocks; F2, Neogene and Pleistocene formations; and F3, Holocene formations. The site conditions for the F3 unit may be further refined using correlations with topographic slope based on the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission at 3 arcsec resolution (SRTM3) dataset. We analyzed the performance site‐condition models based on correlations with exogenous data (topographic slope and surface‐geology analogs). The results show that the residual distributions between logVS30 values measured and estimated from those proxies are strongly biased for some geological units, emphasizing the need for acquiring regional VS data.

1 June 2014 in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SVS. P. Vilanova
S. P. Vilanova
ENE. S. Nemser
E. S. Nemser
GBG. M. Besana-Ostman
G. M. Besana-Ostman
MBMourad Bezzeghoud
Mourad Bezzeghoud
JBJosé Fernando Borges
José Fernando Borges
JFJ. F. B. D. Fonseca
J. F. B. D. Fonseca
Vilanova, Susana P. ... et. al.-- 18 pages, electronic supplement http://bssa.geoscienceworld.org/content/104/3/1212/suppl/DC1In probabilistic seismic‐hazard analysis (PSHA), seismic source zone (SSZ) models are widely used to account for the contribution to the hazard from earthquakes not directly correlated with geological structures. Notwithstanding the impact of SSZ models in PSHA, the theoretical framework underlying SSZ models and the criteria used to delineate the SSZs are seldom explicitly stated and suitably documented. In this paper, we propose a methodological framework to develop and document SSZ models, which includes (1) an assessment of the appropriate scale and degree of stationarity, (2) an assessment of seismicity catalog completeness‐related issues, and (3) an evaluation and credibility ranking of physical criteria used to delineate the boundaries of the SSZs. We also emphasize the need for SSZ models to be supported by a comprehensive set of metadata documenting both the unique characteristics of each SSZ and the criteria used to delineate its boundaries. This procedure ensures that the uncertainties in the model can be properly addressed in the PSHA and that the model can be easily updated whenever new data are available. The proposed methodology is illustrated using the SSZ model developed for the Azores–West Iberian region in the context of the Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe project (project SHARE) and some of the most relevant SSZs are discussed in detailPeer reviewe

1 May 1999 in Natural Hazards
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PTP. Teves-Costa
P. Teves-Costa
JBJosé Fernando Borges
José Fernando Borges
IRI. Rio
I. Rio
RRR. Ribeiro
R. Ribeiro
CMC. Marreiros
C. Marreiros