Damien Jougnot

Dr. Damien Jougnot

Sorbonne Université, CNRS, EPHE, UMR 7619 METIS, F-75005 Paris, France
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2007 in Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARA. Revil
A. Revil
NLN. Linde
N. Linde
ACA. Cerepi
A. Cerepi
Damien JougnotDamien Jougnot
Damien Jougnot
SMStephan Matthai
Stephan Matthai
Stefan FinsterleStefan Finsterle
Stefan Finsterle

1 January 2010 in Geophysical Journal International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Damien JougnotDamien Jougnot
Damien Jougnot
AGA. Ghorbani
A. Ghorbani
ARA. Revil
A. Revil
PLP. Leroy
P. Leroy
PCP. Cosenza
P. Cosenza
Summary. We have developed a mechanistic model to interpret spectral induced polarization data of partially saturated clay-rocks. This model accounts for the p

13 February 2007 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NLN. Linde
N. Linde
Damien JougnotDamien Jougnot
Damien Jougnot
ARA. Revil
A. Revil
SMStephan Matthai
Stephan Matthai
TAT. Arora
T. Arora
CDClaude Doussan
Claude Doussan
Self‐potential (SP) signals that are generated under two‐phase flow conditions could be used to study vadose zone dynamics and to monitor petroleum production. These streaming‐potentials may also act as an error source in SP monitoring of vulcanological activity and in magnetotelluric studies. We propose a two‐phase flow SP theory that predicts streaming currents as a function of the pore water velocity, the excess of charge in the pore water, and the porosity. The source currents that create the SP signals are given by the divergence of the streaming currents, and contributions are likely to be located at infiltration fronts, at the water table, or at geological boundaries. Our theory was implemented in a hydrogeological modeling code to calculate the SP distribution during primary drainage. Forward and inverse modeling of a well‐calibrated 1D drainage experiment suggest that our theory can predict streaming potentials in the vadose zone.

1 April 2016 in Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLShuai Li
Shuai Li
Philippe LeroyPhilippe Leroy
Philippe Leroy
Frank HeberlingFrank Heberling
Frank Heberling
NDNicolas Devau
Nicolas Devau
Damien JougnotDamien Jougnot
Damien Jougnot
CCChristophe Chiaberge
Christophe Chiaberge


12 January 2023 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Thomas HermansThomas Hermans
Thomas Hermans
PGPascal Goderniaux
Pascal Goderniaux
Damien JougnotDamien Jougnot
Damien Jougnot
JFJan H. Fleckenstein
Jan H. Fleckenstein
Philip A. BrunnerPhilip A. Brunner
Philip A. Brunner
TBTanguy Le Borgne
Tanguy Le Borgne
Essentially all hydrogeological processes are strongly influenced by the subsurface spatial heterogeneity and the temporal variation of environmental conditions, hydraulic properties, and solute concentrations. This spatial and temporal variability generally leads to effective behaviors and emerging phenomena that cannot be predicted from conventional approaches based on homogeneous assumptions and models. However, it is not always clear when, why, how, and at what scale the 4D (3D + time) nature of the subsurface needs to be considered in hydrogeological monitoring, modeling, and applications. In this paper, we discuss the interest and potential for the monitoring and characterization of spatial and temporal variability, including 4D imaging, in a series of hydrogeological processes: (1) groundwater fluxes, (2) solute transport and reaction, (3) vadose zone dynamics, and (4) surface–subsurface water interactions. We first identify the main challenges related to the coupling of spatial and temporal fluctuations for these processes. We then highlight recent innovations that have led to significant breakthroughs in high-resolution space–time imaging and modeling the characterization, monitoring, and modeling of these spatial and temporal fluctuations. We finally propose a classification of processes and applications at different scales according to their need and potential for high-resolution space–time imaging. We thus advocate a more systematic characterization of the dynamic and 3D nature of the subsurface for a series of critical processes and emerging applications. This calls for the validation of 4D imaging techniques at highly instrumented observatories and the harmonization of open databases to share hydrogeological data sets in their 4D components.