Aspirin resistance describes a phenomenon where patients receiving aspirin therapy do not respond favorably to treatment, and is categorized by continued incidence of adverse cardiovascular events and/or the lack of reduced platelet reactivity. Studies demonstrate that one in four patients with vascular disease are resistant to aspirin therapy, placing them at an almost four-fold increased risk of major adverse limb and adverse cardiovascular events. Despite the increased cardiovascular risk incurred by aspirin resistant patients, strategies to diagnose or overcome this resistance are yet to be clinically validated and integrated. Currently, five unique laboratory assays have shown promise for aspirin resistance testing: Light transmission aggregometry, Platelet Function Analyzer-100, Thromboelastography, Verify Now, and Platelet Works. Newer antiplatelet therapies such as Plavix and Ticagrelor have been tested as an alternative to overcome aspirin resistance (used both in combination with aspirin and alone) but have not proven to be superior to aspirin alone. A recent breakthrough discovery has demonstrated that rivaroxaban, an anticoagulant which functions by inhibiting active Factor X when taken in combination with aspirin, improves outcomes in patients with vascular disease. Current studies are determining how this new regime may benefit those who are considered aspirin resistant.

Objective: Diabetic foot ulcer, which often leads to lower limb amputation, is a devastating complication of diabetes that is a major burden on patients and the healthcare system. The main objective of this study is to determine the economic burden of diabetic foot ulcer-related care. Methods: We conducted a multicenter study of all diabetic foot ulcer patients admitted to general internal medicine wards at seven hospitals in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada from 2010 to 2015, using the GEMINI database. We compared the mean costs of care per patient for diabetic foot ulcer-related admissions, admissions for other diabetes-related complications, and admissions for the top five most costly general internal medicine conditions, using the Ontario Case Costing Initiative. Regression models were used to determine adjusted estimates of cost per patient. Propensity-score matched analyses were performed as sensitivity analyses. Results: Our study cohort comprised of 557 diabetic foot ulcer patients; 2939 non-diabetic foot ulcer diabetes patients; and 23,656 patients with the top 5 most costly general internal medicine conditions. Diabetic foot ulcer admissions incurred the highest mean cost per patient ($22,754) when compared to admissions with non-diabetic foot ulcer diabetes ($8,350) and the top five most costly conditions ($10,169). Using adjusted linear regression, diabetic foot ulcer admissions demonstrated a 49.6% greater mean cost of care than non-diabetic foot ulcer-related diabetes admissions (95% CI 1.14–1.58), and a 25.6% greater mean cost than the top five most costly conditions (95% CI 1.17–1.34). Propensity-scored matched analyses confirmed these results. Conclusion: Diabetic foot ulcer patients incur significantly higher costs of care when compared to admissions with non-diabetic foot ulcer-related diabetes patients, and the top five most costly general internal medicine conditions.

Fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs) are proteins found in the cytosol that contribute to disorders related to the cardiovascular system, including atherosclerosis and metabolic syndrome. Functionally, FABPs serve as intracellular lipid chaperones, interacting with hydrophobic ligands and mediating their transportation to sites of lipid metabolism. To date, nine unique members of the FABP family (FABP 1–9) have been identified and classified according to the tissue in which they are most highly expressed. In the literature, FABP3 has been shown to be a promising clinical biomarker for coronary and peripheral artery disease. Given the rising incidence of cardiovascular disease and its associated morbidity/mortality, identifying biomarkers for early diagnosis and treatment is critical. In this review, we highlight key discoveries and recent studies on the role of FABP3 in cardiovascular disorders, with a particular focus on its clinical relevance as a biomarker for peripheral artery disease.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is characterized by the atherosclerotic narrowing of lower limb vessels, leading to ischemic muscle pain in older persons. Some patients experience progression to advanced chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) with poor long-term survivorship. Herein, we performed serum metabolomics to reveal the mechanisms of PAD pathophysiology that may improve its diagnosis and prognosis to CLTI complementary to the ankle–brachial index (ABI) and clinical presentations. Non-targeted metabolite profiling of serum was performed by multisegment injection–capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry (MSI–CE–MS) from age and sex-matched, non-diabetic, PAD participants who were recruited and clinically stratified based on the Rutherford classification into CLTI (n = 18) and intermittent claudication (IC, n = 20). Compared to the non-PAD controls (n = 20), PAD patients had lower serum concentrations of creatine, histidine, lysine, oxoproline, monomethylarginine, as well as higher circulating phenylacetylglutamine (p < 0.05). Importantly, CLTI cases exhibited higher serum concentrations of carnitine, creatinine, cystine and trimethylamine-N-oxide along with lower circulating fatty acids relative to well matched IC patients. Most serum metabolites associated with PAD progression were also correlated with ABI (r = ±0.24−0.59, p < 0.05), whereas the ratio of stearic acid to carnitine, and arginine to propionylcarnitine differentiated CLTI from IC with good accuracy (AUC = 0.87, p = 4.0 × 10⁻⁵). This work provides new biochemical insights into PAD progression for the early detection and surveillance of high-risk patients who may require peripheral vascular intervention to prevent amputation and premature death.

Objective: Peripheral artery disease patients have been shown to be more susceptible to thrombotic events compared to non-peripheral artery disease patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the coagulation profile in peripheral artery disease patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia, moderate peripheral artery disease patients with claudication, and non-peripheral artery disease controls. Methods: Chronic limb threatening ischemia patients were matched to peripheral artery disease patients with claudication and non-peripheral artery disease controls in a 1:1:1 ratio. Each patient had their cytokines, markers of thrombin generation, coagulation factors, natural anti-coagulants, fibrinolysis, and endothelial injury markers assessed. Results: Markers of thrombin activation, thrombin Fragments F1 + 2 (Frag 1 + 2), and thrombin–anti-thrombin complex were found to be significantly elevated in all peripheral artery disease and chronic limb threatening ischemia patients relative to non-peripheral artery disease controls. Similarly, relative to non-peripheral artery disease controls, inflammatory markers including C-reactive protein, soluble platelet factor 4, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin were also found to be significantly upregulated in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients, but not in peripheral artery disease patients with claudication. Furthermore, our data demonstrated significant increases in markers of endothelial injury in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients relative to non-peripheral artery disease controls. Finally, decreases in natural anti-coagulants (protein C and protein S) and coagulation factors FIX, FXI, and FXII were also observed in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients when compared with non-peripheral artery disease controls. Conclusions: Our data suggest that in relation to non-peripheral artery disease controls, chronic limb threatening ischemia patients are more hypercoagulable. However, peripheral artery disease patients with claudication appear to have similar levels of circulating procoagulant markers as non-peripheral artery disease patients. This may explain the increased risk of thrombotic events observed in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients.

Carotid artery stenosis (CAS), an atherosclerotic disease of the carotid artery, is one of the leading causes of transient ischemic attacks (TIA) and cerebrovascular attacks (CVA). The atherogenic process of CAS affects a wide range of physiological processes, such as inflammation, endothelial cell function, smooth muscle cell migration and many more. The current gold-standard test for CAS is Doppler ultrasound; however, there is yet to be determined a strong, clinically validated biomarker in the blood that can diagnose patients with CAS and/or predict adverse outcomes in such patients. In this comprehensive literature review, we evaluated all of the current research on plasma and serum proteins that are current contenders for biomarkers for CAS. In this literature review, 36 proteins found as potential biomarkers for CAS were categorized in to the following nine categories based on protein function: (1) Inflammation and Immunity, (2) Lipid Metabolism, (3) Haemostasis, (4) Cardiovascular Markers, (5) Markers of Kidney Function, (6) Bone Health, (7) Cellular Structure, (8) Growth Factors, and (9) Hormones. This literature review is the most up-to-date and current comprehensive review of research on biomarkers of CAS, and the only review that demonstrated the several pathways that contribute to the initiation and progression of the disease. With this review, future studies can determine if any new markers, or a panel of the proteins explored in this study, may be contenders as diagnostic or prognostic markers for CAS.