Lorenzo Sani

Dr. Lorenzo Sani

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 October 2022 in Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PPPasquale MD Piombino
Pasquale MD Piombino
LSLorenzo Sani
Lorenzo Sani
GSGiorgia Sandu
Giorgia Sandu
ECEmanuele Carraturo
Emanuele Carraturo
GRGiacomo Md De Riu
Giacomo Md De Riu
LCLuigi Califano
Luigi Califano
Titanium plates and screws are essential devices in maxillofacial surgery since late 1980s, but despite their wide use there is no consensus in titanium internal fixators removal after bone healing. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted on seventeen retrospective studies. Effect size and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for plate removal (per plate and per patient) and for removal causes (infection, pain, screws complications, exposition, palpability). Odds ratio, 95% confidence intervals, and χ2 test were measured for sex, smoking, and implant site. Heterogeneity was evaluated with Cochran and Inconstancy test. Obtained data were used to design Forest and Funnel plots. The aim of the study is to identify and clarify reasons and risk factors for plates and screws removal. Infection is the most frequent reason; the habit of tobacco usage and implant site (mandibula) are the main risk factors. The administration of antibiotic prophylaxis is essential, and patients must quit smoking before and after surgery. In conclusion there is no scientific evidence supporting the removal of internal devices as mandatory step of the postoperative procedure.

19 September 2022 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PPPasquale Piombino
Pasquale Piombino
VAVincenzo Abbate
Vincenzo Abbate
LSLorenzo Sani
Lorenzo Sani
STStefania Troise
Stefania Troise
UCUmberto Committeri
Umberto Committeri
LCLuigi Califano
Luigi Califano
Over 70% of patients suffering from dentofacial deformities mention esthetics as the biggest issue pushing them to look for orthodontic and orthognathic treatment. At present, several pieces of software for computer-aided surgery have been released on the market. This surgical planning software allows surgeons to manipulate digital representations of hard and soft tissue profile tracings and subsequently morph the pretreatment image to produce a treatment simulation. The aims of this study were to investigate and find the difference between two of the most used pieces of digital software in pre-surgical planning for patients affected by dentofacial deformities by using the following parameters: usability, validity, timing, accessibility, efficacy, and predictability of the pre-surgical planning. Analyzing the results obtained from our study, it is correct to define both software tools useful and valid in digital surgical planning for the treatment of patients with dentofacial deformities. Each software has negligible differences in performance that do not in any way affect the success of surgical planning. The IPS software represents a valid alternative to the most popular and tested Dolphin Imaging software, and we are even inclined to evaluate it as better in terms of accuracy, effectiveness, and reliability.

21 December 2022 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Antonio RomanoAntonio Romano
Antonio Romano
STStefania Troise
Stefania Troise
Francesco MaffìaFrancesco Maffìa
Francesco Maffìa
UCUmberto Committeri
Umberto Committeri
LSLorenzo Sani
Lorenzo Sani
GOGiovanni Dell`Aversana Orabona
Giovanni Dell`Aversana Orabona
The surgical treatment of isolated medial orbital wall fractures is still a much-debated topic in the literature due to the choice of many surgical accesses. The main options are represented by transcutaneous versus endonasal endoscopic approaches. Our study aims to clarify the role of ethmoidectomy in the pure endoscopic endonasal reduction of medial orbital wall fractures, evaluating the immediate postoperative outcome and its long-term stability. A total of 31 patients affected by isolated medial orbital wall fracture, treated only by endoscopic approach, were included in the study and divided in two groups: (A) 14 patients treated by endoscopic reduction and anterior ethmoidectomy; (B) 17 patients treated by endoscopic reduction and anteroposterior ethmoidectomy. Perioperative and 6-month postoperative follow-up CT scans were performed. With the use of 3D medical software, we evaluated the comparison between the treated orbit and the mirrored contralateral orbit in the two groups, in order to observe the reduction of the fracture. Furthermore, to check the stability of reduction and to evaluate any medial orbital wall changes, we provided a comparison between the 3D CT scan orbital images of immediate postoperative CT and 6-month follow-up. Data obtained showed that the intraoperative surgical reduction was successful in all 31 cases, but it was better in Group B. Stability of the reduction at 6 months was observed in both groups without significant discrepancies. In our opinion, the endonasal endoscopic approach with ethmoidectomy represents a valid and useful technique by which to treat medial orbital wall fractures. The anatomical detail of the buttressing structures of the medial orbital wall, as the second portion of the middle turbinate, grants long-term stability of the surgical outcome.