Jiujun Zhang

Dr. Jiujun Zhang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 January 2012 in Chemical Society Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GWGuoping Wang
Guoping Wang
LZLei Zhang
Lei Zhang
JZJiujun Zhang
Jiujun Zhang
In this critical review, metal oxides-based materials for electrochemical supercapacitor (ES) electrodes are reviewed in detail together with a brief review of carbon materials and conducting polymers. Their advantages, disadvantages, and performance in ES electrodes are discussed through extensive analysis of the literature, and new trends in material development are also reviewed. Two important future research directions are indicated and summarized, based on results published in the literature: the development of composite and nanostructured ES materials to overcome the major challenge posed by the low energy density of ES (476 references).

1 January 2014 in Chemical Society Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JQJinli Qiao
Jinli Qiao
YLYuyu Liu
Yuyu Liu
FHFeng Hong
Feng Hong
JZJiujun Zhang
Jiujun Zhang
This paper reviews recent progress made in identifying electrocatalysts for carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction to produce low-carbon fuels, including CO, HCOOH/HCOO−, CH2O, CH4, H2C2O4/HC2O4 −, C2H4, CH3OH, CH3CH2OH and others. The electrocatalysts are classified into several categories, including metals, metal alloys, metal oxides, metal complexes, polymers/clusters, enzymes and organic molecules. The catalyts' activity, product selectivity, Faradaic efficiency, catalytic stability and reduction mechanisms during CO2 electroreduction have received detailed treatment. In particular, we review the effects of electrode potential, solution–electrolyte type and composition, temperature, pressure, and other conditions on these catalyst properties. The challenges in achieving highly active and stable CO2 reduction electrocatalysts are analyzed, and several research directions for practical applications are proposed, with the aim of mitigating performance degradation, overcoming additional challenges, and facilitating research and development in this area.

1 January 2011 in Energy & Environmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZCZhongwei Chen
Zhongwei Chen
DHDrew Higgins
Drew Higgins
AYAiping Yu
Aiping Yu
LZLei Zhang
Lei Zhang
JZJiujun Zhang
Jiujun Zhang
With the approaching commercialization of PEM fuel cell technology, developing active, inexpensive non-precious metal ORR catalyst materials to replace currently used Pt-based catalysts is a necessary and essential requirement in order to reduce the overall system cost. This review paper highlights the progress made over the past 40 years with a detailed discussion of recent works in the area of non-precious metal electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction, a necessary reaction at the PEM fuel cell cathode. Several important kinds of unsupported or carbon supported non-precious metal electrocatalysts for ORR are reviewed, including non-pyrolyzed and pyrolyzed transition metal nitrogen-containing complexes, conductive polymer-based catalysts, transition metal chalcogenides, metal oxides/carbides/nitrides/oxynitrides/carbonitrides, and enzymatic compounds. Among these candidates, pyrolyzed transition metal nitrogen-containing complexes supported on carbon materials (M–Nx /C) are considered the most promising ORR catalysts because they have demonstrated some ORR activity and stability close to that of commercially available Pt/C catalysts. Although great progress has been achieved in this area of research and development, there are still some challenges in both their ORR activity and stability. Regarding the ORR activity, the actual volumetric activity of the most active non-precious metal catalyst is still well below the DOE 2015 target. Regarding the ORR stability, stability tests are generally run at low current densities or low power levels, and the lifetime is far shorter than targets set by DOE. Therefore, improving both the ORR activity and stability are the major short and long term focuses of non-precious metal catalyst research and development. Based on the results achieved in this area, several future research directions are also proposed and discussed in this paper.

1 April 2006 in Journal of Power Sources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HLHansan Liu
Hansan Liu
CSChaojie Song
Chaojie Song
LZLei Zhang
Lei Zhang
JZJiujun Zhang
Jiujun Zhang
HWHaijiang Wang
Haijiang Wang
DWDavid P. Wilkinson
David P. Wilkinson

1 September 2008 in Journal of Power Sources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJinfeng Wu
Jinfeng Wu
XYXiao Zi Yuan
Xiao Zi Yuan
JMJonathan J. Martin
Jonathan J. Martin
HWHaijiang Wang
Haijiang Wang
JZJiujun Zhang
Jiujun Zhang
WMWalter Merida
Walter Merida

25 March 2010 in Chemical Society Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YBYonghong Bing
Yonghong Bing
HLHansan Liu
Hansan Liu
LZLei Zhang
Lei Zhang
DGDave Ghosh
Dave Ghosh
JZJiujun Zhang
Jiujun Zhang
In this critical review, we present the current technological advances in proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell catalysis, with a focus on strategies for developing nanostructured Pt-alloys as electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). The achievements are reviewed and the major challenges, including high cost, insufficient activity and low stability, are addressed and discussed. The nanostructured Pt-alloy catalysts can be grouped into different clusters: (i) Pt-alloy nanoparticles, (ii) Pt-alloy nanotextures such as Pt-skins/monolayers on top of base metals, and (iii) branched or anisotropic elongated Pt or Pt-alloy nanostructures. Although some Pt-alloy catalysts with advanced nanostructures have shown remarkable activity levels, the dissolution of metals, including Pt and alloyed base metals, in a fuel cell operating environment could cause catalyst degradation, and still remains an issue. Another concern may be low retention of the nanostructure of the active catalyst during fuel cell operation. To facilitate further efforts in new catalyst development, several research directions are also proposed in this paper (130 references).