Zhanfeng Liu

Dr. Zhanfeng Liu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 October 2020 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YYYe Yuan
Ye Yuan
YLYue Li
Yue Li
ZMZhijian Mou
Zhijian Mou
LKLuhui Kuang
Luhui Kuang
WWWenjia Wu
Wenjia Wu
ZLZhanfeng Liu
Zhanfeng Liu

8 December 2022 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SZShu‐Yi‐Dan Zhou
Shu‐Yi‐Dan Zhou
ZLZhiyang Lie
Zhiyang Lie
XLXujun Liu
Xujun Liu
YZYong‐Guan Zhu
Yong‐Guan Zhu
Josep PenuelasJosep Penuelas
Josep Penuelas
JLjuxiu liu
juxiu liu

5 May 2022 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YJYonglei Jiang
Yonglei Jiang
JZJing Zhang
Jing Zhang
MDManuel Delgado-Baquerizo
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo
MBMichiel Op de Beeck
Michiel Op de Beeck
MSMuhammad Shahbaz
Muhammad Shahbaz
ZLZhanfeng Liu
Zhanfeng Liu

17 October 2022 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TLTengteng Li
Tengteng Li
YYYe Yuan
Ye Yuan
ZMZhijian Mou
Zhijian Mou
YLYue Li
Yue Li
LKLuhui Kuang
Luhui Kuang
ZLZhanfeng Liu
Zhanfeng Liu

29 September 2023 in Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZMZhijian Mou
Zhijian Mou
LKLuhui Kuang
Luhui Kuang
JZJing Zhang
Jing Zhang
YLYue Li
Yue Li
WWWenjia Wu
Wenjia Wu
ZLZhanfeng Liu
Zhanfeng Liu

19 March 2015 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YCYuanqi Chen
Yuanqi Chen
ZLZhanfeng Liu
Zhanfeng Liu
XRXingquan Rao
Xingquan Rao
XWXiaoling Wang
Xiaoling Wang
CLChenfei Liang
Chenfei Liang
SFShenglei Fu
Shenglei Fu
In order to understand how carbon storage and allocation patterns vary among plantation types, we estimated carbon allocation between above- and below-ground compartments in four subtropical plantations and a naturally recovered shrubland (as a control). Results indicated that the carbon storage and allocation pattern varied greatly among forest types and was highly dependent on specific traits of trees and understory vegetation. The fast-growing species, such as Eucalyptus urophylla, accumulated more carbon in plant biomass. The biomass carbon was about 1.9- and 2.2-times greater than the 10-species mixed plantation and Castanopsis hystrix plantations, respectively. Meanwhile, the plantations sequestered 1.5- to 3-times more carbon in biomass than naturally recovered shrubland. The carbon allocation pattern between above- and below-ground compartments also varied with plantation type and stand age. The ratio of tree root carbon to tree aboveground carbon decreased with stand age for Eucalyptus urophylla and the 10-species mixed plantation. In contrast, the ratio increased for Acacia crassicarpa. Our data suggested that planting the fast-growing species in the degraded land of subtropical China was an effective choice in terms of carbon sequestration. The information about carbon allocation patterns was also valuable for decision making in sustainable forest management and climate change mitigation.