Sharanbir K Sidhu

Dr. Sharanbir K Sidhu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSharanbir K Sidhu
Sharanbir K Sidhu
John NicholsonJohn Nicholson
John Nicholson
This article is an updated review of the published literature on glass-ionomer cements and covers their structure, properties and clinical uses within dentistry, with an emphasis on findings from the last five years or so. Glass-ionomers are shown to set by an acid-base reaction within 2–3 min and to form hard, reasonably strong materials with acceptable appearance. They release fluoride and are bioactive, so that they gradually develop a strong, durable interfacial ion-exchange layer at the interface with the tooth, which is responsible for their adhesion. Modified forms of glass-ionomers, namely resin-modified glass-ionomers and glass carbomer, are also described and their properties and applications covered. Physical properties of the resin-modified glass-ionomers are shown to be good, and comparable with those of conventional glass-ionomers, but biocompatibility is somewhat compromised by the presence of the resin component, 2 hydroxyethyl methacrylate. Properties of glass carbomer appear to be slightly inferior to those of the best modern conventional glass-ionomers, and there is not yet sufficient information to determine how their bioactivity compares, although they have been formulated to enhance this particular feature.

31 May 2020 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
John NicholsonJohn Nicholson
John Nicholson
SSSharanbir K Sidhu
Sharanbir K Sidhu
Beata CzarneckaBeata Czarnecka
Beata Czarnecka
This paper reviews the strategies that have been reported in the literature to attempt to reinforce glass-ionomer dental cements, both conventional and resin-modified. These cements are widely used in current clinical practice, but their use is limited to regions where loading is not high. Reinforcement might extend these applications, particularly to the posterior dentition. A variety of strategies have been identified, including the use of fibres, nanoparticles, and larger particle additives. One problem revealed by the literature survey is the limited extent to which researchers have used International Standard test methods. This makes comparison of results very difficult. However, it does seem possible to draw conclusions from this substantial body of work and these are (1) that powders with conventional particle sizes do not reinforce glass-ionomer cements, (2) certain fibres and certain nanoparticles give distinct improvements in strength, and (3) in the case of the nanoparticles these improvements are associated with differences in the morphology of the cement matrix, in particular, a reduction in the porosity. Despite these improvements, none of the developments has yet been translated into clinical use.

1 January 2010 in Dental Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSharanbir K Sidhu
Sharanbir K Sidhu

1 April 2019 in Dental Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRafael Menezes-Silva
Rafael Menezes-Silva
BOBruna Medeiros Bertol de Oliveira
Bruna Medeiros Bertol de Oliveira
PFPaulo Henrique Martins Fernandes
Paulo Henrique Martins Fernandes
LSLívia Yukari Shimohara
Lívia Yukari Shimohara
FPFabiano Vargas Pereira
Fabiano Vargas Pereira
MNMaria Fidela de Lima Navarro
Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro
Glass-ionomer cements (GICs) modified with cellulose nanocrystals (CNs) were characterized and evaluated for compressive strength (CS), diametral tensile strength (DTS) and fluoride release (F-). Commercially available GICs (Maxxion, Vidrion R, Vitro Molar, Ketac Molar Easy Mix and Fuji Gold Label 9) were reinforced with CNs (0.2% by weight). The microstructure of CNs and of CN-modified GICs were evaluated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) while chemical characterization was by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Ten specimens each of the unmodified (control) and CN-modified materials (test materials) were prepared for CS and DTS testing. For the fluoride release evaluation, separate specimens (n=10) of each test and control material were made. The results obtained were submitted to the t-test (p<0.05). The CN reinforcement significantly improved the mechanical properties and significantly increased the F- release of all GICs (p<0.05). The GICs with CNs showed a fibrillar aggregate of nanoparticles interspersed in the matrix. The compounds with CNs showed a higher amount of C compared to the controls due to the organic nature of the CNs. It was not possible to identify by FTIR any chemical bond difference in the compounds formed when nanofibers were inserted in the GICs. Modification of GICs with CNs appears to produce promising restorative materials.

1 January 2019 in Dental Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLígia S. Bueno
Lígia S. Bueno
RSRafael M. Silva
Rafael M. Silva
AMAna Paula R. Magalhães
Ana Paula R. Magalhães
MNMaria Fidela L. Navarro
Maria Fidela L. Navarro
RPRenata C. Pascotto
Renata C. Pascotto
ABAna Flávia Sanches Borges
Ana Flávia Sanches Borges

1 January 2019 in Journal of Applied Oral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAmmar M. H. R. Hasan
Ammar M. H. R. Hasan
SSSharanbir K Sidhu
Sharanbir K Sidhu
John NicholsonJohn Nicholson
John Nicholson
Key words: Dental cements; Fluoride; Analysis