Iwao Sugitani

Prof. Iwao Sugitani

Department of Endocrine Surgery, Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603 Japan

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 February 2021 in Thyroid®
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ISIwao Sugitani
Iwao Sugitani
YIYasuhiro Ito
Yasuhiro Ito
DTDai Takeuchi
Dai Takeuchi
HNHirotaka Nakayama
Hirotaka Nakayama
CMChie Masaki
Chie Masaki
AMAkira Miyauchi
Akira Miyauchi
Background: The question of how to manage patients with low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC; T1aN0M0) has recently become an important clinical issue. Two Japanese centers have conducted prospective clinical trials of active surveillance (AS) for low-risk PTMC since the 1990s, reporting favorable outcomes. This policy has thus seen gradual adoption worldwide to avoid overtreatment. Not all PTMCs are suitable for AS, however, and many physicians still hesitate to apply the management policy in daily clinical practice. A task force on management for PTMC created by the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery collected and analyzed bibliographic evidence and has produced the present consensus statements regarding indications and concrete strategies for AS to facilitate the management of adult patients diagnosed with low-risk PTMC. Summary: These statements provide indications for AS in adult patients with T1aN0M0 low-risk PTMC. PTMCs with clinical lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis due to carcinoma invasion, or protrusion into the tracheal lumen warrant immediate surgery. Tumors suspected of aggressive subtypes on cytology are recommended for immediate surgery. Immediate surgery is also recommended for tumors adherent to the trachea or located along the course of the RLN. Practical strategies include diagnosis, decision-making, follow-up, and monitoring related to the implementation of AS. The rate of low-risk PTMC progression is lower in older patients. However, we recommend continuing AS as long as circumstances permit. Future tasks in optimizing management for low-risk PTMC are also described, including molecular markers and patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: An appropriate multidisciplinary team is necessary to accurately evaluate primary tumors and lymph nodes at the beginning of and during AS, and to adequately reach a shared-decision with individual patients. If appropriately applied, AS of low-risk PTMC is a safe management strategy offering favorable outcomes and preserves quality of life at low cost.

18 November 2015 in World Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OFOsamu Fukuoka
Osamu Fukuoka
ISIwao Sugitani
Iwao Sugitani
AEAya Ebina
Aya Ebina
KTKazuhisa Toda
Kazuhisa Toda
KKKazuyoshi Kawabata
Kazuyoshi Kawabata
KYKeiko Yamada
Keiko Yamada

14 November 2013 in World Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ISIwao Sugitani
Iwao Sugitani
YFYoshihide Fujimoto
Yoshihide Fujimoto
KYKeiko Yamada
Keiko Yamada

7 June 2021 in World Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RNRyuta Nagaoka
Ryuta Nagaoka
AEAya Ebina
Aya Ebina
KTKazuhisa Toda
Kazuhisa Toda
TJTomoo Jikuzono
Tomoo Jikuzono
MSMarie Saitou
Marie Saitou
ISIwao Sugitani
Iwao Sugitani

1 September 2016 in Thyroid®
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NONaoyoshi Onoda
Naoyoshi Onoda
KSKiminori Sugino
Kiminori Sugino
THTakuya Higashiyama
Takuya Higashiyama
MKMakoto Kammori
Makoto Kammori
KTKazuhisa Toda
Kazuhisa Toda
ISIwao Sugitani
Iwao Sugitani
Background: Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is a rare and extremely aggressive malignancy, with a median survival of less than 6 months due to rapid progression and resistance to multimodal therapies. Effective treatment strategies have not been identified. A prospective clinical study was performed to objectively evaluate outcomes of treatment with paclitaxel. Methods: An investigator-initiated, multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 ) administration for patients with pathologically confirmed ATC was conducted in a nationwide organization. Results: Feasibility was analyzed in 56 patients. More than one course of treatment was performed in 52 (93%) patients retaining sufficient dose intensity (>84%). No patient had to terminate the treatment because of an adverse event. The median overall survival was 6.7 months [confidence interval 4.4–9.0]. The 6-month survival was 54%. Among the 42 patients with an evaluable lesion, none demonstrated complete remission, 9 (21%) showed partial remission, 22 (52%) achieved stable disease, and 8 (19%) exhibited progressive disease; 3 did not complete the initial treatment course. The objective response rate was 21%, and the clinical benefit rate was 73%. The median time to progression was 1.6 months. Statistically, no additional effect of concomitant radiation was demonstrated in 6 patients receiving combined therapy. Eight patients, in whom a complete post-treatment surgical removal of the tumor was feasible, survived significantly longer (median 7.6 months [CI 8.1–23.0]) than the other 34 patients in whom the tumor could not be completely removed after chemotherapy (5.4 months [CI 3.0–7.8], p = 0.018). Summary: The study demonstrates objective and accurate information concerning the feasibility and efficacy of a standardized treatment with weekly paclitaxel administration for ATC patients. Conclusions: Weekly paclitaxel administration for ATC patients can be of clinical benefit in a neo-adjuvant setting.

3 August 2022 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
THTakuya Higashiyama
Takuya Higashiyama
KSKiminori Sugino
Kiminori Sugino
HHHisato Hara
Hisato Hara
KIKen-Ichi Ito
Ken-Ichi Ito
NNNoriaki Nakashima
Noriaki Nakashima
MTMakoto Tahara
Makoto Tahara