Ananta Man Singh Pradhan

Dr. Ananta Man Singh Pradhan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications


7 December 2018 in Landslides
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APAnanta Man Singh Pradhan
Ananta Man Singh Pradhan
SLSeung-Rae Lee
Seung-Rae Lee
YKYun-Tae Kim
Yun-Tae Kim

22 July 2016 in Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APAnanta Man Singh Pradhan
Ananta Man Singh Pradhan
YKYun-Tae Kim
Yun-Tae Kim

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAnanta Man Singh Pradhan
Ananta Man Singh Pradhan
YKYun-Tae Kim
Yun-Tae Kim
Landslides impact on human activities and socio-economic development, especially in mountainous areas. This study focuses on the comparison of the prediction capability of advanced machine learning techniques for the rainfall-induced shallow landslide susceptibility of Deokjeokri catchment and Karisanri catchment in South Korea. The influencing factors for landslides, i.e., topographic, hydrologic, soil, forest, and geologic factors, are prepared from various sources based on availability, and a multicollinearity test is also performed to select relevant causative factors. The landslide inventory maps of both catchments are obtained from historical information, aerial photographs and performed field surveys. In this study, Deokjeokri catchment is considered as a training area and Karisanri catchment as a testing area. The landslide inventories contain 748 landslide points in training and 219 points in testing areas. Three landslide susceptibility maps using machine learning models, i.e., Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Deep Neural Network (DNN), are prepared and compared. The outcomes of the analyses are validated using the landslide inventory data. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) method is used to verify the results of the models. The results of this study show that the training accuracy of RF is 0.756 and the testing accuracy is 0.703. Similarly, the training accuracy of XGBoost is 0.757 and testing accuracy is 0.74. The prediction of DNN revealed acceptable agreement between the susceptibility map and the existing landslides, with a training accuracy of 0.855 and testing accuracy of 0.802. The results showed that the DNN model achieved lower prediction error and higher accuracy results than other models for shallow landslide modeling in the study area.

1 December 2016 in Engineering Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NVNikhil Nedumpallile Vasu
Nikhil Nedumpallile Vasu
SLSeung-Rae Lee
Seung-Rae Lee
APAnanta Man Singh Pradhan
Ananta Man Singh Pradhan
YKYun-Tae Kim
Yun-Tae Kim
Seung-Rae LeeSeung-Rae Lee
Seung-Rae Lee
DLDeuk-Hwan Lee
Deuk-Hwan Lee