Purpose: Nursing students often experience anxiety and stress when taking exams that test their fundamental nursing skills. Complementary alternative methods, such as aromatherapy and music therapy, have effectively alleviated such negative emotions among nursing students. However, few studies have examined the effects of combined therapy interventions or compared the effects of different interventions. This study identified the individual and combined effects of aromatherapy and music therapy on test anxiety, state anxiety, stress, and fundamental nursing skills among nursing students in Korea. Methods: A double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial design was used. The study was conducted at the nursing college at Sungshin Women’s University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Ninety-eight sophomore female nursing students participated in the study. Subjects were randomly categorized under three groups: aromatherapy (n = 32), music therapy (n = 32), and aromatherapy combined with music therapy (n = 34). Aromatherapy was carried out through the inhalation method using an aroma lamp and three drops of Origanum majorana and Citrus sinensis. Music therapy was carried out using Beethoven’s Moonlight Sonata. Twenty-minute interventions were performed in separate rooms before an exam was administered. Data were collected through self-report questionnaires, including demographics, test anxiety, state anxiety, and stress. Participants’ Foley catheterization skill was likewise evaluated. Results: Aromatherapy combined with music therapy had a significant effect on test anxiety (F = 4.29, p = 0.016), state anxiety (F = 4.77, p = 0.011), stress (F = 4.62, p = 0.012), and performance of fundamental nursing skills (F = 8.04, p = 0.001) compared with aromatherapy and music therapy as separate interventions. Conclusions: The results suggest that nursing education that includes aromatherapy combined with music therapy may be effective for improving the performance of fundamental nursing skills and reducing anxiety and stress among nursing students.

Background: Clinical reasoning ability, a complex cognitive and metacognitive process, is a crucial core competency required in nursing practice. Therefore, undergraduate nursing students should be provided with nursing education to strengthen their clinical reasoning ability based on real-life nursing scenarios. Methods: This study was conducted using a quasi-experimental single-group pretest–posttest design. Three sessions (lasting three hours each) of Simulation with Problem-Based Learning (S-PBL) using high-risk obstetrics-gynecology scenarios were provided to 71 third-year nursing students of a university. The sessions were conducted from September to December 2022, and they aimed to strengthen their clinical reasoning ability. For data collection, an online survey was conducted using Rubric for Clinical Reasoning and learning satisfaction evaluation tool. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and repeated measures analysis of variance in SPSS. Results: The mean score of clinical reasoning ability significantly increased from 29.42 (standard deviation: 4.62) out of 40 points in the pre-test to 32.28 (4.36), 33.44 (5.35), and 33.80 (5.91) after the first, second, and third S-PBL sessions, respectively (F = 61.668, p < .001). The learning satisfaction score was as high as 107.04 (12.66) out of 120 points. Conclusion: This S-PBL program is an effective nursing education strategy to strengthen nursing students’ clinical reasoning ability. Future studies must examine learner variables and standardize the S-PBL design and operation process by comparison to a traditional teaching approach and a higher range of clincal reasoning ability.

Due to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, there are many restrictions in effect in clinical nursing practice. Since effective educational strategies are required to enhance nursing students’ competency in clinical practice, this study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of simulation problem-based learning (S-PBL). A quasi-experimental control group pretest-post-test design was used. Nursing students were allocated randomly to the control group (n = 31) and the experimental group (n = 47). Students in the control group participated in a traditional maternity clinical practicum for a week, while students in the experimental group participated S-PBL for a week. The students in the experimental group were trained in small groups using a childbirth patient simulator (Gaumard^® Noelle^® S554.100, Miami, USA) based on a standardized scenario related to obstetric care. The students’ learning attitude, metacognition, and critical thinking were then measured via a self-reported questionnaire. Compared with the control group, the pre-post difference in learning attitude and critical thinking increased significantly (p < 0.01) in the experimental group. S-PBL was found to be an effective strategy for improving nursing students’ learning transfer. Thus, S-PBL that reflects various clinical situations is recommended to improve the training in maternal health nursing.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of simulation problem-based learning (S-PBL), a type of learning that reflects various clinical situations, and demonstration-based learning, a conventional type of learning that shows clinical skill performance, of Papanicolaou smear education on the self-confidence, learner satisfaction, and critical thinking of nursing students. A quasi-experimental control group pretest-posttest design was used. Nursing students who were classified as advanced beginners were randomly allocated to the control group (n = 53) or the experimental group (n = 52). Students in the control group participated in a conventional demonstration of a Papanicolaou smear, while students in the experimental group participated in S-PBL. The students’ self-confidence, learner satisfaction, and critical thinking were measured via a self-reported questionnaire. Compared with the control group, self-confidence, learner satisfaction, and critical thinking increase significantly more (p < 0.001) in the experimental group. S-PBL was found to be an effective strategy for improving learning transfer, applying learned nursing knowledge to simulated nursing situations. Thus, S-PBL is recommended to improve training in nursing education.

Undergraduate students studying health professions receive a uniprofessional education in an isolated educational environment within the university curriculum, and they have limited opportunities to experience collaborative learning through interactions with other professions. This study adopted a one-group, pretest–posttest, quasi-experimental design to investigate the effect of an undergraduate course that applied simulation problem-based learning (S-PBL) on nursing and dental hygiene students’ empathy, attitudes toward caring for the elderly, and team efficacy. The S-PBL was designed based on the ARCS model of motivation proposed by Keller, and the subjects (n = 24) participated in a small group activity of identifying and checking for medical errors that may pose a threat to patients’ safety. The results showed that there was a statistically significant increase in the subjects’ attitudes toward caring for the elderly (t = 3.11, p = 0.01) and team efficacy (t = 2.84, p = 0.01) after participating in the S-PBL. The teaching method developed by this study aims to counteract the problems of the limited experience available to undergraduate health profession students during clinical practicum in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the limitations of interprofessional education, and it has established the groundwork for further exploration of the learning transfer effect of S-PBL.